Common use of Protection against Hacking Clause in Contracts

Protection against Hacking. 3.7.1. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. 3.7.2. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Examples of techniques included in tamper-resistant technology are: 3.7.2.1. Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.

Protection against Hacking. 3.7.11.6.1. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. 3.7.21.6.2. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Examples of techniques included in tamper-tamper- resistant technology are: 3.7.2.11.6.2.1. Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.

Protection against Hacking. 3.7.11.6.1. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. 3.7.21.6.2. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-tamper- resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Examples of techniques included in tamper-resistant technology are: 3.7.2.11.6.2.1. Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.

Protection against Hacking. 3.7.11.6.1. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected and designed to resist against tampering, forging, and spoofing. 3.7.21.6.2. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-tamper- resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Examples of techniques included in tamper-resistant technology are: 3.7.2.11.6.2.1. Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.

Protection against Hacking. 3.7.11.6.1. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. 3.7.21.6.2. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Examples of techniques included in tamper-resistant technology are: 3.7.2.11.6.2.1. Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.