Rating System. Unit members’ evaluations will be based on a rubric of four (4) descriptors as follows: Does Not Meet Standards, Developing Practice/Needs to Improve, Meets Standards, or Exemplifies or Exceeds Standards. Definitions of these descriptors are explained in the “Descriptors of Practice” included in the Certificated Evaluation Handbook. The evaluator must include narrative comments in the case of Does Not Meet Standards, Developing Practice/Needs to Improve and Unsatisfactory ratings and is encouraged to make comments on Meets or Exceeds Criteria ratings. For permanent and non-permanent unit members using the Observation Format, a Summary Evaluation which includes two (2) of the five (5) or the three (3) overall categories pertaining to student instruction rated as “Does Not Meet Standards” will equal an overall Unsatisfactory Evaluation. A Summary Evaluation which includes three (3) of the five (5) overall categories pertaining to student instruction rated as “Needs to Improve” will equal an overall Needs to Improve. A Summary Evaluation which includes three (3) of any of the above five (5) categories pertaining to student instruction rated as two (2) or below will equal an overall Needs to Improve.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
