Common use of Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Clause in Contracts

Reasonable Apprehension of Bias. 18.3.1 For purposes of Articles 25.5.2(b), 30.2.5, 31.2.5 and 41.1.6(a), a reasonable apprehension of bias arises when a reasonable person, informed of interactions between a Committee member and a Member who is or will be the subject of the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, would consider it likely that the Committee member would not be able to decide the matter impartially because of either a positive or negative bias. Where such a person: (a) is not a person in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, that person may express their concern of reasonable apprehension of bias in writing to the individual to whom the Committee member reports and this individual shall determine whether the expression of concern is well-founded. Such a determination shall not mean that the Committee member is, in fact, biased. If the individual to whom the Committee member reports concludes that the expression of concern is well-founded, and if the Committee member has participated in the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, they shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy; or (b) is in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, such person, if they believe their concern is well-founded, shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy.

Reasonable Apprehension of Bias. 18.3.1 For purposes of Articles 25.5.2(b), 30.2.5, 31.2.5 and 41.1.6(a), a reasonable apprehension of bias arises when a reasonable person, informed of interactions between a Committee member and a Member who is or will be the subject of the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, would consider it likely that the Committee member would not be able to decide the matter impartially because of either a positive or negative bias. Where such a person: (a) is not a person in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, that person may express their concern of reasonable apprehension of bias in writing to the individual to whom the Committee member reports and this individual shall determine whether the expression of concern is well-founded. Such a determination shall not mean that the Committee member is, in fact, biased. If the individual to whom the Committee member reports concludes that the expression of concern is well-founded, and if the Committee member has participated in the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, they he/she shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy; or (b) is in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, such person, if they believe their he/she believes his/her concern is well-founded, shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy.

Reasonable Apprehension of Bias. 18.3.1 For purposes of Articles 25.5.2(b), 30.2.5, 31.2.5 and 41.1.6(a), a reasonable apprehension of bias arises when a reasonable person, informed of interactions between a Committee member and a Member who is or will be the subject of the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, would consider it likely that the Committee member would not be able to decide the matter impartially because of either a positive or negative bias. Where such a person: (a) is not a person in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, that person may express their concern of reasonable apprehension of bias in writing to the individual to whom the Committee member reports and this individual shall determine whether the expression of concern is well-well- founded. Such a determination shall not mean that the Committee member is, in fact, biased. If the individual to whom the Committee member reports concludes that the expression of concern is well-founded, and if the Committee member has participated in the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, they he/she shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy; or (b) is in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, such person, if they believe their he/she believes his/her concern is well-founded, shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy.

Reasonable Apprehension of Bias. 18.3.1 For purposes of Articles 25.5.2(b), 30.2.5, 31.2.5 and 41.1.6(a)41.1.6, a reasonable apprehension of bias arises when a reasonable person, informed of interactions between a Committee member and a Member who is or will be the subject of the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, would consider it likely that the Committee member would not be able to decide the matter impartially because of either a positive or negative bias. Where such a person: (a) is not a person in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, that person may express their concern of reasonable apprehension of bias in writing to the individual to whom the Committee member reports and this individual shall determine whether the expression of concern is well-well- founded. Such a determination shall not mean that the Committee member is, in fact, biased. If the individual to whom the Committee member reports concludes that the expression of concern is well-founded, and if the Committee member has participated in the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, they he/she shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy; or, (b) is in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, such person, if they believe their he/she believes his/her concern is well-founded, shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy.

Reasonable Apprehension of Bias. 18.3.1 For purposes of Articles 25.5.2(b), 30.2.5, 31.2.5 and 41.1.6(a), a reasonable apprehension of bias arises when a reasonable person, informed of interactions between a Committee member and a Member who is or will be the subject of the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, would consider it likely that the Committee member would not be able to decide the matter impartially because of either a positive or negative bias. Where such a person: (a) is not a person in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, that person may express their concern of reasonable apprehension of bias in writing to the individual to whom the Committee member reports and this individual shall determine whether the expression of concern is well-founded. Such a determination shall not mean that the Committee member is, in fact, biased. If the individual to whom the Committee member reports concludes that the expression of concern is well-founded, and if the Committee member has participated in the Committee’s deliberations or recommendations, they he/shethey shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy; or (b) is in receipt of a recommendation from the Committee in question, such person, if they believe their he/shethey believes his/hertheir concern is well-founded, shall inform the Faculty Relations Office which shall consult with the Association in fashioning an appropriate remedy.