EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. 29.1 The Employer will evaluate and compare only the Bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clause 26.
29.2 In evaluating the Bids, the Employer will determine for each Bid the evaluated Bid Price by adjusting the Bid Price as follows:
(a) Making any correction for errors pursuant to Clause 27; or
(b) Making an appropriate adjustments for any other acceptable variations, deviations; and
(c) Making appropriate adjustments to reflect discounts or other price modifications offered in accordance with Sub Clause 22.5.
29.3 The Employer reserves the right to accept or reject any variation, deviation, or alternative offer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors which are in excess of the requirements of the Bidding documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the Employer shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation.
29.4 The estimated effect of the price adjustment conditions under Clause 47 of the Conditions of Contract, during the period of implementation of the Contract, will not be taken into account in Bid evaluation.
29.5 If the Bid of the successful Bidder is seriously unbalanced in relation to the Engineer’s estimate of the cost of work to be performed under the contract, the Employer may require the Bidder to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bill of Quantities, to demonstrate the internal consistency of those prices with the construction methods and schedule proposed. After evaluation of the price analyses, the Employer may require that the amount of the performance security set forth in Clause 34 be increased at the expense of the successful Bidder to a level sufficient to protect the Employer against financial loss in the event of default of the successful Bidder under the Contract. 30. (Deleted)
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. 30.1 The Employer will carry out evaluation of details and information provided in post- Qualification Questionnaire and any bidder who does not qualify shall not have his/her bid evaluated further.
30.2 The Employer will then evaluate and compare only the bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clauses 27 and 28.
30.3 If the lowest evaluated tender is seriously unbalanced or front loaded in relation to the Employer’s estimate of the items of work to be performed under the Contract, the Employer may require the tenderer to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bills of Quantities, to demonstrate the relationship between those prices, proposed construction methods and schedules. The bidder shall within FOUR (4) days after issuance of the written notice by the employer, or such further time as the employer may allow, provide a satisfactory analysis for the items asked for by the Employer. After evaluation of the price analyses, the Employer may require that the amount of the Performance Security set forth in clause 17 be increased at the expense of the successful tenderer to a level sufficient to protect the Employer against financial loss in the event of subsequent default of the successful tenderer under the Contract
30.4 The procuring entity may at any time terminate procurement proceedings before contract award and shall not be liable to any person for the termination.
30.5 The procuring entity shall give prompt notice of the termination to the tenderers and on request give its reasons for termination within 14 days of receiving the request from any tenderer.
30.6 A tenderer who gives false information in the tender document about its qualification or who refuses to enter into a contract after notification of contract award shall be considered for debarment from participating in future public procurement.
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. 30.1 The Employer will carry out evaluation of details and information provided in post- Qualification Questionnaire and any bidder who does not qualify shall not have his/her bid evaluated further.
30.2 The Employer will then evaluate and compare only the bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clauses 27 and 28.
30.3 If the bid, which results in the lowest Evaluated Bid Price is seriously unbalanced or front loaded in relation to the Engineer's estimate of the items of work to be performed under the contract, the Employer may require the bidder to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bills of Quantities, to demonstrate the internal consistency of those prices with the construction methods and schedule proposed. The bidder shall within three (3) days after issuance of the written notice by the employer, or such further time as the employer may allow, provide a satisfactory analysis failure to which the tender shall be rejected.
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. Bid shall be evaluated as per evaluation criteria mentioned in Section-II of bidding documents.
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. 31.1 The Purchaser will evaluate and compare the bids, which have been determined to be substantially responsive.
31.2 The Purchaser's evaluation of a bid will take into consideration one or more of the following factors All the bids, which are opened, read out and considered for evaluation will be checked for qualification requirements in respect of technical and commercial aspects. Such of the bids, which do not meet the qualification requirements, will not be evaluated further. The bid is to be checked for its conformity to the technical specification. If it does not meet the technical Specification, the Bid will not be evaluated further. However, if in the opinion of the purchaser the bidder has offered equipment/material better than the technical specification the same may be considered. The bid may be rejected for the following reasons:
1. Not in the prescribed form
2. Insufficient bid security or bid not accompanied by the required bid security or proof of permanent bid security/exemption
3. Bids not properly signed
4. The bidder is a vendor who is banned from further business transactions and the period of ban is still in force.
5. Bid received after the due date and time
6. The bid is through telegram or fax
7. Bids submitted not as per measuring units mentioned in the tender document. For example: If the unit of measurement in tenders is in Kilolitres (KL) & if the bidder has quoted his rate for Litres with the same unit of measurement in kilo Litres (KL), then the bidder has to be disqualified as the bidder quoted rate is too low for Kilo Litre which is impossible to supply at that rate. ● Further, the purchaser may enquire from the bidder in writing for any clarification of the bid. The response of the bidder will also be in writing. However no change in the prices or substance of the bid will be sought, offered or permitted. ● Bids will be examined for completeness and for any computational errors. ● Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis. O Where there is a discrepancy between the unit price and total price, the unit price will prevail and the total price will be corrected accordingly. O Where there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the amount in words will prevail. O If there is a discrepancy between the soft copy and the hard copy, the hard copy will prevail. O If the bidder does not attest any overwriting in the price column such Bids will be rejected. O Failure on the part of the bidder to agree to the abov...
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. 28.1 The Procuring Agency shall evaluate and compare the bids on the basis of Single items/ Complete package (As demanded in the advertised tender), which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to ITB Clause 25.
28.2 The Procuring Agency’s evaluation of technical proposal/ bid shall be on the basis of prequalification and previous performances of quoted product/model.
28.3 All bids shall be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria (ITB Clause
28.4 For the purpose of comparison of bids quoted in different currencies, the price shall be converted into Pak Rupees in pursuant to ITB Clause 13 & 14.
28.5 A bid once opened in accordance with the prescribed procedure shall be subject to only those rules, regulations and policies that are in force at the time of issue of notice for invitation of bids.
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. 4.16.1 “The tender will be evaluated strictly as per Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act 1998 and the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules 2000 and subsequent amendments thereof till date”.
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. Confidentiality 26.1 Information relating to the evaluation of Bids and recommendation to award Framework Agreements, shall not be disclosed to Bidders or any other persons not officially concerned with the Bidding process until information on Award of the Framework Agreement(s) is transmitted to all Bidders in accordance with ITB 37. 26.2 Any effort by a Bidder to influence the Procuring Agency in the evaluation or decision to award Framework Agreement(s) may result in the rejection of its Bid.
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. Bid shall be evaluated as per Evaluation Methodology mentioned in Section-II of Tender Document (refer clause 7.0 of ITB). In case of a tie at the lowest bid (L1) position between two or more startup/non- startup bidders, the order/LoA will be placed on the bidder who has higher/ highest turnover in last audited financial year. In case there is a tie at the lowest bid (L1) position between only startup bidders and none of them has past turnover, the order/LoA will be placed on the startup who is registered earlier with Department of Industrial Promotion and Policy.
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS. 28.1 The Procuring Agency shall evaluate and compare the bids on the basis of Single items/ Complete package (As demanded in the advertised tender), which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to ITB Clause 25.
28.2 The Procuring Agency’s evaluation of technical proposal/ bid shall be on the basis of evaluation criteria, technical & managerial capabilities and previous performances of quoted product/ model.
28.3 All bids shall be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria (ITB Clause 29) and other terms and conditions set forth in these bidding documents.
28.4 A bid once opened in accordance with the prescribed procedure shall be subject to only those rules, regulations and policies that are in force at the time of issue of notice for invitation of bids.
