Common use of Reduction Amount Clause in Contracts

Reduction Amount. (1) The amount of earned fee, fixed fee, profit, or share of cost savings that may be unilaterally reduced will be determined by the severity of the performance failure pursuant to the degrees specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this Clause. (2) If a reduction of earned fee, fixed fee, profit, or share of cost savings is warranted, unless mitigating factors apply, such reduction shall not be less than 26% nor greater than 100% of the amount of earned fee, fixed fee, profit, or the Contractor's share of cost savings for a first degree performance failure, not less than 11% nor greater than 25% for a second degree performance failure, and up to 10% for a third degree performance failure. (3) In determining the amount of the reduction and the applicability of mitigating factors, DOE will consider the Contractor's overall performance in meeting the ESH&Q or security requirements of the Contract. Such consideration will include performance against any site specific performance criteria/requirements that provide additional definition, guidance for the amount of reduction, or guidance for the applicability of mitigating factors. In all cases, DOE will consider mitigating factors that may warrant a reduction below the applicable range (see 48 CFR 970.1504-1-2). The mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, the following ((v), (vi), (vii) and (viii) apply to ESH&Q only). (i) Degree of control the Contractor had over the event or incident. (ii) Efforts the Contractor had made to anticipate and mitigate the possibility of the event in advance. (iii) Contractor self-identification and response to the event to mitigate impacts and recurrence. (iv) General status (trend and absolute performance) of: ESH&Q and compliance in related areas; or of safeguarding Restricted Data and other classified information and compliance in related areas. (v) Contractor demonstration to the Contracting Officer’s satisfaction that the principles of industrial ESH&Q standards are routinely practiced (e.g., Voluntary Protection Program, ISO [International Organization for Standardization] 14000, Environmental Management System Standards). (vi) Event caused by "Good Samaritan" act by the Contractor (e.g., off-site emergency response). (vii) Contractor demonstration that a performance measurement system is routinely used to improve and maintain ESH&Q performance (including effective resource allocation) and to support DOE corporate decision- making (e.g., policy, ESH&Q programs). (viii) Contractor demonstration that an Operating Experience and Feedback Program is functioning that demonstrably affects continuous improvement in ESH&Q by use of lessons-learned and best practices inter- and intra- DOE sites. (4) (i) The amount of fee, fixed fee, profit, or share of cost savings that is otherwise earned by a Contractor during an evaluation period may be reduced in accordance with this Clause if it is determined that a performance failure warranting a reduction under this Clause occurs within the evaluation period.

Appears in 8 contracts

Samples: Contract, Contract, Contract

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!