Regulatory Jurisdictional Issues Sample Clauses

Regulatory Jurisdictional Issues. The parties to the Asia-Australia Discussion Agreement are not only subject to Australian competition law through Part X of the TPA, but may also be subject to the jurisdiction of competition laws of other nations, namely in this case the Peoples Republic of China (PRC), Hong Kong and Taiwan. The Commission seeks to understand if the compliance of the parties to the AADA to the competition laws of these three countries affects the ability of the parties to the AADA to comply with Part X of the TPA. • Can you give a brief description of the main elements of Government regulation governing competition in export liner trades for the countries of PRC, Hong Kong and Taiwan? • By complying with the provisions of the competition law regimes of these three countries, does the parties to the AADA experience any difficulty in complying with the new provisions of Part X in relation to inbound liner trades? Please explain. • By complying with the provisions of the new provisions of Part X relating to inbound liner trades, does this create problems for the AADA in complying with the provisions of the competition laws of any of the above three countries? Please explain. • By complying with the provisions of the competition laws of the above three countries does this create problems for the parties to the AADA in cooperating fully in this Part X investigation? If so please explain. Attachment A – Parties to the Asia – Australia Discussion Agreement ANL Container Line Pty Limited (ANLCL) China Shipping Container Lines Co Ltd (CSCL) COSCO FESCO Evergreen Marine Corporation Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampschiffahrts – Gesellschaft KG (Columbus Line) Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd Hyundai Merchant Marine, Seoul (HMM) Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (K Line) Maersk Sealand Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd (MOL) Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (MSC) NYK Line Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd (OOCL) P&O Swire Containers Ltd Zim Israel Navigation Co Ltd
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Regulatory Jurisdictional Issues

  • REGULATORY JURISDICTION Subject to Section 19.01, nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the rights of the Parties to file a complaint with or submit any action to the Commission or any other appropriate regulatory authority under relevant provisions of the Federal Power Act or other relevant statutory provisions, nor shall anything in this Agreement affect the jurisdiction of the Commission or any other regulatory authority over matters arising under this Agreement.

  • Ethical Issues The Operator agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws and all ethical requirements imposed on it or Physicians involved in the Services and to report to AHS and all interested Professional Governing Bodies any circumstances of which it becomes aware which could involve a breach of ethical requirements by it or any such Physician.

  • Technical Issues 1.1 The Client is solely responsible for obtaining and/or maintaining compatible equipment necessary to access and use the Trading Platform, which includes at least a personal computer, internet access and telephone and/or other access line. Access to the internet is an essential feature and the Client shall be solely responsible for any fees necessary, in order to ensure his connectivity to the internet.

  • FEDERAL JURISDICTIONAL AREAS 33.1. Article 1, § 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution provides the authority to Congress to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over areas and structures used for military purposes (Federal Enclaves). Thus, Telecommunications Services to such Federal Enclaves are not subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Parties agree that Services provided within Federal Enclaves are not within the scope of this Agreement. To the extent Sprint has contracts with federal entities that limit or prohibit the ability of CLEC to provide resale or UNEs such contract will govern Telecommunications Services on such Federal Enclave. If the contract with the federal entity provides for the resale or provision of UNEs to provide service on the Federal Enclave, Sprint will provide CLEC with the information regarding the provision of service on the Federal Enclave.

  • Non-Jurisdictional Entities LIPA and NYPA do not waive their exemptions, pursuant to Section 201(f) of the FPA, from Commission jurisdiction with respect to the Commission’s exercise of the FPA’s general ratemaking authority.

  • Jurisdictional Disputes 17.01 A xxxx-up meeting will be held with each Contractor not later than the commencement of the Contractor's work on all projects and no assignments shall be made before this xxxx- up. Xxxx-up assignments shall also apply to all sub-contractors. If a jurisdictional dispute arises once the work has commenced, assignments will be made in accordance with procedures, rules and regulations of the National Joint Board Building Trades Department, A.F.L. & C.I.O. The work assignment shall not be completed until a meeting on site has been convened with all Parties involved and until a subsequent meeting (not later than twenty-four (24) hours) has taken place, at which the Contractor shall present the work assignment on paper to all Parties.

  • Competent Authorities The Parties shall inform each other about the structure, organisation and division of competences of their competent authorities during the first meeting of the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Sub-Committee referred to in Article 65 of this Agreement ("SPS Sub-Committee"). The Parties shall inform each other of any change of the structure, organisation and division of competences, including of the contact points, concerning such competent authorities.

  • Open Issues (a) Notwithstanding any provision of the Registry Agreement to the contrary (including Sections 7.6 and 7.7 thereof), Registry Operator agrees that the following requirements, procedures and provisions of the Registry Agreement (including the documents incorporated by reference therein) may be modified and amended by ICANN after the date hereof, without the consent of Registry Operator:

  • Laws and Jurisdiction 12.1.Unless otherwise specified in a CTC, the Agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the following countries and their courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute which arises under or in connection with the Agreement. Where the Buyer is Unilever Supply Chain Company AG, Unilever Business and Marketing Support AG or Unilever Americas Supply Chain Company AG, the applicable law and jurisdiction is English. Where the Buyer is Unilever Asia Private Limited, the applicable law and jurisdiction is Singapore. In all other cases the applicable law and jurisdiction is that of the country where Buyer is registered. The application of the 1980 Vienna Convention on the International Sale of Goods is excluded. Annex A - Specific provisions for the supply of Products These clauses apply to the extent the Supplier supplies Products.

  • Environmental Issues Neither Seller nor any agent or representative of Seller has made any representations as to any environmental, health or safety conditions that which exists or may arise at the Property. Purchaser assumes responsibility for any and all clean-up costs, and will indemnify Seller, and hold Seller harmless, with respect to the same.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!