Common use of Relation to other International Agreements Clause in Contracts

Relation to other International Agreements. 1. The Parties reaffirm their rights and obligations with respect to each other under the WTO Agreement, and other agreements to which the Parties are party. 2. In case of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the agreements mentioned in paragraph 1, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail, unless otherwise agreed. 3. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the specific trade obligations set forth in: a) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), done at Washington, March 3, 1973, as amended June 22, 1979; b) the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer done at Montreal, September 16, 1987, as amended June 29, 1990; or c) the Basel Convention on the Control of Trans-boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, done at Basel, March 22, 1989, these obligations shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, provided that where a Party has a choice among equally effective and reasonably available means of complying with such obligations, the Party chooses the alternative that is the least inconsistent with the other provisions of this Agreement.

Relation to other International Agreements. 1. The Parties reaffirm confirm their rights and obligations with respect to each other existing between them under the WTO Agreement, Agreement and other agreements to which the Parties they are party. 2. In case the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement the agreements referred to in paragraph 1 and the provisions of the agreements mentioned in paragraph 1this Treaty, the provisions latter shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement shall prevail, unless otherwise agreedTreaty. 3. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the specific trade obligations set forth contained in: a) the The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)Flora, done at Washington, in Washington on 3 March 3, 1973, as amended 1973 with its amendment of 22 June 22, 1979; b) the The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer done at MontrealLayer, 16 September 16, 1987, . as amended on 29 June 29, 1990; or c) the The Basel Convention on the Control of Trans-boundary Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, done at Basel, on 22 March 22, 1989, these ; such obligations shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, provided that where a Party has a choice among equally effective and reasonably available means of complying at its disposal to comply with such obligations, choose to submit the Party chooses the alternative that is the least inconsistent lesser degree of inconsistency with the other provisions of this AgreementTreaty.

Relation to other International Agreements. 1. The Parties reaffirm their rights and obligations with respect to each other under the WTO Agreement, Agreement and other agreements to which the Parties are party. 2. In case of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the agreements mentioned in paragraph 1, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail, unless otherwise agreed. 3. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the specific trade obligations set forth in: (a) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), done at Washington, March 3, 1973, as amended June 22, 1979; (b) the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer Layer, done at Montreal, September 16, 1987, as amended June 29, 19901990 and September 27, 1997; or (c) the Basel Convention on the Control of Trans-boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their their Disposal, done at Basel, March 22, 1989, these ; such obligations shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, provided that where a Party has a choice among equally effective and reasonably available means of complying with such obligations, the Party chooses the alternative that is the least inconsistent with the other provisions of this Agreement.

Relation to other International Agreements. 1. The Parties reaffirm their rights and obligations with respect to each other under the WTO Agreement, Agreement and other agreements to which the Parties are party. 2. In case of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the agreements mentioned in paragraph 1, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail, unless otherwise agreed. 3. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the specific trade obligations set forth in: : (a) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), done at Washington, March 3, 1973, as amended June 22, 1979; ; (b) the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer Layer, done at Montreal, September 16, 1987, as amended June 29, 19901990 and September 27, 1997; or or (c) the Basel Convention on the Control of Trans-boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their their Disposal, done at Basel, March 22, 1989, these ; such obligations shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, provided that where a Party has a choice among equally effective and reasonably available means of complying with such obligations, the Party chooses the alternative that is the least inconsistent with the other provisions of this Agreement.