Common use of Remarks Concerning Unity of Invention Clause in Contracts

Remarks Concerning Unity of Invention. If the applicant paid additional fees for the interna- tional preliminary examination, or if the international application or the international preliminary examina- tion was restricted under Article 34(3), the report shall so indicate. Furthermore, where the international pre- liminary examination was carried out on restricted claims (Article 34(3)(a)), or on the main invention only (Article 34(3)(c)), the report shall indicate what parts of the international application were and what parts were not the subject of international preliminary examination. The report shall contain the indications provided for in Rule 68.1, where the International Preliminary Examining Authority chose not to invite the applicant to restrict the claims or to pay additional fees.

Remarks Concerning Unity of Invention. If the applicant paid additional fees for the interna- interna• tional preliminary examination, or if the international application or the international preliminary examina- examina• tion was restricted under Article 34(3), the report shall so indicate. Furthermore, where the international pre- pre• liminary examination was carried out on restricted claims (Article 34(3)(a)), or on the main invention only (Article 34(3)(c)), the report shall indicate what parts of the international application were and what parts were not the subject of international preliminary examination. The report shall contain the indications provided for in Rule 68.1, where the International Preliminary Examining Authority chose not to invite the applicant to restrict the claims or to pay additional fees.

Remarks Concerning Unity of Invention. If the applicant paid additional fees for the interna- interna tional preliminary examination, or if the international application or the international preliminary examina- examina tion was restricted under Article 34(3), the report shall so indicate. Furthermore, where the international pre- pre liminary examination was carried out on restricted claims (Article 34(3)(a)), or on the main invention only (Article 34(3)(c)), the report shall indicate what parts of the international application were and what parts were not the subject of international preliminary examination. The report shall contain the indications provided for in Rule 68.1, where the International Preliminary Examining Authority chose not to invite the applicant to restrict the claims or to pay additional fees.