Occupancy Permit CLEC occupancy of Structure shall be pursuant to a permit issued by CBT for each requested Attachment. Any such permit shall terminate (a) if CLEC's franchise, consent or other authorization from federal, state, county or municipal entities or private property owners is terminated, (b) if CLEC has not placed and put into service its Attachments within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date CBT has notified CLEC that such Structure is available for CLEC's Attachments, and such delay is not caused by an CBT Delaying Event, (c) if CLEC ceases to use such Attachment for any period of one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days, (d) if CLEC fails to comply with a material term or condition of this Article XVI and does not correct such noncompliance within sixty (60) days after receipt of notice thereof from CBT or (e) if CBT ceases to have the right or authority to maintain its Structure, or any part thereof, to which CLEC has Attachments. If CBT ceases to have the right or authority to maintain its Structure, or any part thereof, to which CLEC has Attachments, CBT shall (i) provide CLEC notice within ten (10) Business Days after CBT has knowledge of such fact and (ii) not require CLEC to remove its Attachments from such Structure prior to CBT's removal of its own attachments. CBT will provide CLEC with at least sixty (60) days written notice prior to (x) terminating a permit or service to an CLEC Attachment or removal thereof for a material breach of the provisions of this Article XVI, (y) any increase in the rates for Attachments to CBT's Structure permitted by the terms of this Agreement, or (z) any modification to CBT's Structure to which CLEC has an Attachment, other than a modification associated with routine maintenance or as a result of an emergency. If CLEC surrenders its permit for any reason (including forfeiture under the terms of this Agreement), but fails to remove its Attachments from the Structure within one hundred eighty (180) days after the event requiring CLEC to so surrender such permit, CBT shall remove CLEC's Attachments at CLEC's expense.
Owner Occupancy Participant(s) agree to maintain the property as their primary residence during the term of this Agreement, any extensions thereof, or until closeout, documentation is approved by NCORR. If during the term of the Grant Agreement, Participant(s) (1) use the property as an investment property (2) convert the structure to an ineligible structure type or use, or (3) uses the property as a recreational house or “second” home, then NCORR may require immediate payment in full of the entire grant amount provided to the Participant(s). Participant(s) agree that if during the term of this Agreement, any extensions thereof or prior to closeout, Participant(s) sell part or all of the property without NCORR’s prior written consent, then NCORR may require payment in full the amount of the Grant outstanding at the time of sale.
Occupancy Restrictions For the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 42 of the Code, at least for the Qualified Project Period, the Owner hereby represents, covenants and agrees as follows:
Termination of Occupancy Upon termination of occupancy of a County Assisted Unit by a Tenant, such Unit will be deemed to be continuously occupied by a household of the same income level as the initial income level of the vacating Tenant, until such unit is reoccupied, at which time categorization of the Unit will be established based on the occupancy requirements of Section 2.1.
Licence to Occupy Premises A5.1 Any land or Premises made available to the Contractor by the Authority in connection with the Contract, shall be made available to the Contractor on a non-exclusive licence basis free of charge and shall be used by the Contractor solely for the purpose of performing its obligations under the Contract. The Contractor shall have the use of such land or Premises as licensee and shall vacate the same on completion, termination or abandonment of the Contract.
Ground Lease Reserved.
Occupancy Requirements Residence hall space may be occupied only by the student with whom this agreement is made. The agreement may not be assigned, and residence hall space may not be sublet, rented to, or otherwise shared with or another person. a Guest Limitations: Students are responsible for the actions and any damages incurred by their guests.
B7 Licence to Occupy Premises B7.1 Any land or Premises made available from time to time to the Contractor by the Authority in connection with the Contract shall be on a non-exclusive licence basis free of charge and shall be used by the Contractor solely for the purpose of performing its obligations under the Contract. The Contractor shall have the use of such land or Premises as licensee and shall vacate the same on completion, termination or abandonment of the Contract.
OCCUPANCY AND USE The premises shall be used solely as a dwelling for Tenants(s) and for no others and no others may spend amounts of time on the premises so as to disturb other Tenants. Tenant agrees not to use or permit the use of the premises for unlawful or immoral purposes. Tenant agrees to keep the premises clean, sanitary and in good order, and agrees not to hamper, disturb or interfere with other tenants in the building or apartment, not to create or suffer any nuisances in the premises affecting the rights of others, and agrees to comply with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and directions of governmental authorities. Upon termination of this Lease, Tenant agrees to surrender possession in as good condition and repair as when received, ordinary wear and tear accepted.
Status Substantial Compliance Analysis The Compliance Officer found that PPB is in substantial compliance with Paragraph 80. See Sections IV and VII Report, p. 17. COCL carefully outlines the steps PPB has taken—and we, too, have observed—to do so. Id. We agree with the Compliance Officer’s assessment. In 2018, the Training Division provided an extensive, separate analysis of data concerning ECIT training. See Evaluation Report: 2018 Enhanced Crisis Intervention Training, Training usefulness, on-the-job applications, and reinforcing training objectives, February 2019. The Training Division assessed survey data showing broad officer support for the 2018 ECIT training. The survey data also showed a dramatic increase in the proportion of officers who strongly agree that their supervisors are very supportive of the ECIT program, reaching 64.3% in 2018, compared to only 14.3% in 2015: The Training Division analyzed the survey results of the police vehicle operator training and supervisory in-service training, as well. These analyses were helpful in understanding attendees’ impressions of training and its application to their jobs, though the analyses did not reach as far as the ECIT’s analysis of post-training on- the-job assessment. In all three training analyses, Training Division applied a feedback model to shape future training. This feedback loop was the intended purpose of Paragraph 80. PPB’s utilization of feedback shows PPB’s internalization of the remedy. We reviewed surveys of Advanced Academy attendees, as well. Attendees were overwhelmingly positive in response to the content of most classes. Though most respondents agreed on the positive aspects of keeping the selected course in the curriculum, a handful of attendees chose options like “redundant” and “slightly disagree,” indicating that the survey tools could be used for critical assessment and not merely PPB self-validation. We directly observed PPB training and evaluations since our last report. PPB provided training materials to the Compliance Officer and DOJ in advance of training. Where either identified issues, PPB worked through those issues and honed its materials. As Paragraph 80 requires, PPB’s training included competency-based evaluations, namely: knowledge checks (i.e., quizzes on directives), in-class responsive quizzes (using clickers to respond to questions presented to the group); knowledge tests (examinations via links PPB sent to each student’s Bureau-issued iPhone); demonstrated skills and oral examination (officers had to show proficiency in first aid skills, weapons use, and defensive tactics); and scenario evaluations (officers had to explain their reasoning for choices after acting through scenarios). These were the same sort of competency-based evaluations we commended in our last report. In this monitoring period, PPB applied the same type of evaluations to supervisory-level training as well as in-service training for all sworn members. PPB successfully has used the surveys, testing, and the training audit.
