Research Integrity Sample Clauses

Research IntegrityResearch misconduct by a Grantee receiving LLS support is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families it seeks to serve, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. The Parties hereby agree to follow, and Sponsoring Institution shall cause Grantee to follow, the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct and confirm that they are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93). For the avoidance of doubt, the NIH defines “Research Misconduct” to mean fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (further defined below) in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Research IntegrityResearch misconduct involving LLS support is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families it seeks to serve, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. The Parties hereby agree to follow the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct and confirm that they are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93). For the avoidance of doubt, the NIH defines “Research Misconduct” to mean fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
Research IntegrityThe Centre guarantees and warrants that it will follow all applicable rules and regulations for participating in the MSBase/MGBase Registry Observational Study, including all ethics/waivers/consents and all required reporting of serious adverse events.
Research IntegrityThe Host Organisation warrants that at the date of this agreement, there are no allegations of a breach of the Code nor Research Misconduct currently being investigated against the Fellow nor have any allegations been previously upheld.
Research IntegritySponsoring Institution acknowledges that research misconduct by Grantee is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. Sponsoring Institution will cause Grantee to follow the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct. Sponsoring Institution represents and warrants that such policies are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93).
Research IntegrityStudent Employees are governed by, subject to, and have rights as outlined in the University’s Misconduct in Research policies, as may be amended from time to time. Complaints regarding research and integrity shall be processed solely in accordance with University policies and related procedures, which may be amended from time to time by the University.
Research IntegritySponsoring Institution acknowledges that research misconduct by any Investigator receiving LLS support is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families it seeks to serve, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. Sponsoring Institution shall cause all Sponsoring Institution Investigators to follow the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct. Sponsoring Institution represents and warrants that such policies are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Research IntegritySection 1: Employees are governed by, subject to, and have rights as outlined in the University’s Misconduct in Research policies, as may be amended from time to time. Complaints regarding research and integrity shall be processed solely in accordance with University policies and related procedures, which may be amended from time to time by the University. Section 2: The Union may raise the topic of authorship disputes with a group comprised of representatives from the Office of Faculty Affairs, Office of Academic Affairs, and the Office of Postdoctoral Affairs who will organize and engage in discussion of the authorship dispute issues. Section 3: The University shall not engage in any form of retaliation against an Employee who engages in a good faith effort to assert rights or otherwise participates under the University’s Misconduct in Research policies.
Research IntegritySection 1: Employees are governed by, subject to, and have rights as outlined in the University’s Misconduct in Research policies, as may be amended from time to time. Complaints regarding research and integrity shall be processed solely in accordance with University policies and related procedures, which may be amended from time to time by the University. Section 2: The Union may raise the topic of authorship disputes for discussion in the Union Management Committee. Section 3: The University shall not engage in any form of retaliation against an Employee who engages in a good faith effort to assert rights or otherwise participates under the University’s Misconduct in Research policies.
Research IntegrityIn order to ensure the necessary level of research integrity, the beneficiaries must follow principles listed in this Article and ensure that the persons carrying out research tasks comply with the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity54 (i.e. follow the good research practices listed in this Code and refrain from any research integrity violations it describes). ▪ reliability in ensuring the quality of research reflected in the design, the methodology, the analysis and the use of resources 54 Available at xxxx://xx.xxxxxx.xx/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of- conduct_en.pdf. ▪ honesty in developing, undertaking, reviewing, reporting and communicating research in a transparent, fair and unbiased way ▪ respect for colleagues, research participants, society, ecosystems, cultural heritage and the environment ▪ accountability for the research from the idea to publication, for its management and organisation, for training, supervision and mentoring, and for its wider impacts. The Code constitutes a general reference framework and takes into account the legitimate interests of the beneficiaries (i.e. regarding IPRs and data sharing). This does not change the other obligations under this Agreement or obligations under applicable international, EU or national law, all of which still apply. In addition, beneficiaries should rely on local, national or discipline-specific guidelines, if such documents exist and are not contrary to the Code. The detailed research integrity obligations were introduced with GA version 3.0. For older grant agreements, these obligations were however already implicitly included in Article 34 (which already provided for the more general obligation to comply with the highest standards of research integrity and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity).
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!