Research Integrity. Research misconduct by a Grantee receiving LLS support is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families it seeks to serve, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. The Parties hereby agree to follow, and Sponsoring Institution shall cause Grantee to follow, the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct and confirm that they are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93). For the avoidance of doubt, the NIH defines “Research Misconduct” to mean fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (further defined below) in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
Research Integrity. Research misconduct involving LLS support is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families it seeks to serve, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. The Parties hereby agree to follow the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct and confirm that they are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93). For the avoidance of doubt, the NIH defines “Research Misconduct” to mean fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
Research Integrity. The Centre guarantees and warrants that it will follow all applicable rules and regulations for participating in the MSBase/MGBase Registry Observational Study, including all ethics/waivers/consents and all required reporting of serious adverse events.
Research Integrity. Sponsoring Institution acknowledges that research misconduct by Grantee is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. Sponsoring Institution will cause Grantee to follow the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct. Sponsoring Institution represents and warrants that such policies are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93).
Research Integrity. The Host Organisation warrants that at the date of this agreement, there are no allegations of a breach of the Code nor Research Misconduct currently being investigated against the Fellow nor have any allegations been previously upheld.
Research Integrity. Student Employees are governed by, subject to, and have rights as outlined in the University’s Misconduct in Research policies, as may be amended from time to time. Complaints regarding research and integrity shall be processed solely in accordance with University policies and related procedures, which may be amended from time to time by the University.
Research Integrity. Section 1: Employees are governed by, subject to, and have rights as outlined in the University’s Misconduct in Research policies, as may be amended from time to time. Complaints regarding research and integrity shall be processed solely in accordance with University policies and related procedures, which may be amended from time to time by the University.
Section 2: The Union may raise the topic of authorship disputes for discussion in the Union Management Committee.
Section 3: The University shall not engage in any form of retaliation against an Employee who engages in a good faith effort to assert rights or otherwise participates under the University’s Misconduct in Research policies.
Research Integrity. Section 1: Employees are governed by, subject to, and have rights as outlined in the University’s Misconduct in Research policies, as may be amended from time to time. Complaints regarding research and integrity shall be processed solely in accordance with University policies and related procedures, which may be amended from time to time by the University.
Section 2: The Union may raise the topic of authorship disputes with a group comprised of representatives from the Office of Faculty Affairs, Office of Academic Affairs, and the Office of Postdoctoral Affairs who will organize and engage in discussion of the authorship dispute issues.
Section 3: The University shall not engage in any form of retaliation against an Employee who engages in a good faith effort to assert rights or otherwise participates under the University’s Misconduct in Research policies.
Research Integrity. Sponsoring Institution acknowledges that research misconduct by any Investigator receiving LLS support is contrary to the interests of LLS and the patients and their families it seeks to serve, as well as to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of donor funds. Sponsoring Institution shall cause all Sponsoring Institution Investigators to follow the Sponsoring Institution’s policies as they relate to Research Misconduct. Sponsoring Institution represents and warrants that such policies are at least as rigorous as those followed by the NIH (Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct 42 CFR 93).
Research Integrity. 23.1 City expects you to seek to maintain the highest achievable standards in research conduct. You are responsible for familiarising yourself with the City Framework for Good Practice in Research. The framework applies to all staff and students who are engaged in or support research activity and is intended to assist City in achieving its commitment to academic excellence and to ensure continued compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity.
