Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.
Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.
System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.
Review and Appeal (a) Each Party shall establish or maintain judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose of the prompt review and, where warranted, correction of final administrative actions regarding matters covered by this Treaty. Such tribunals shall be impartial and independent of the office or authority entrusted with administrative enforcement and shall not have any substantial interest in the outcome of the matter.
Conformance to Applicable Requirements All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.
Monitoring Plan keep up with the objectives from the cadetship practice booklet; taking daily notes as well as learning new information every day; currently reporting to the supervisor. Evaluation plan: the final result should be in accordance with the traineeship’s aims and objectives, achieving an improvement of specialty knowledge and language skills. The level of language competence9 in English that the trainee already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the mobility period is: A1 ☐ A2 ☐ B1 ☐ B2 ☒ C1 ☐ C2 ☐ Native speaker ☐ Table B - Sending Institution Please use only one of the following three boxes: 10 The traineeship is embedded in the curriculum and upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to:Award ……...…ECTS credits (or equivalent)11 Give a grade based on: Traineeship certificate ☒ Final report ☒ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records and Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☒ No ☐ The traineeship is voluntary and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Give a grade: Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate if this will be based on: Traineeship certificate ☐ Final report ☐ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records: Yes ☐ No ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☐ No ☐ The traineeship is carried out by a recent graduate and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document (highly recommended): Yes ☐ No ☐ Accident insurance for the trainee The Sending Institution will provide an accident insurance to the trainee (if not provided by the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise): Yes ☐ No ☒ The accident insurance covers: - accidents during travels made for work purposes: Yes ☐ No ☒ - accidents on the way to work and back from work: Yes ☐ No ☒
Training Objectives It is important that the objectives for the employee(s) enrolling in this course or program is related to the strategic objectives of the organization for which the employee works. Provide text to explain how the training event meets agency objective(s) and purpose type.
Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.
Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:
Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:
