Review Committees. A Faculty member shall not participate in the discussion and vote with respect to a candidate to whom the Faculty member is related, as defined by the SIUC Nepotism Policy. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Board policies or operating papers, the following provisions shall be applicable to both the promotion and tenure process:
a. In considering a candidate for promotion and/or tenure, the department/school promotion and tenure committee shall be comprised of at least three (3) tenured Faculty members holding the same or higher rank to which the candidate seeks promotion. In a case where the candidate already has tenure, the candidate may request that the committee have five (5) tenured Faculty members holding the same or higher rank to which the candidate seeks promotion. When a department/school lacks sufficient Faculty members to constitute fully a promotion committee, the department chair/school director shall augment the committee by adding tenured Faculty members at the appropriate ranks from outside the department. The Chair/Director makes the appointment(s) for such augmentation(s); the Chair/Director will consult with the candidate to develop a list of qualified potential appointees for augmentation.
b. Membership on the college promotion and tenure committees will be limited to tenured Faculty members in the rank of associate professor or professor in the applicable college who are not candidates for promotion in that academic year. In considering candidates for promotion, the college committee must include a minimum of three (3) tenured Faculty members holding the same or higher rank to which the candidate seeks promotion. The college committee will be augmented as necessary by adding tenured Faculty members from outside the college. The Xxxx is responsible for making appointment(s) for such augmentation(s); the Xxxx will consult with the candidate(s) to develop a list(s) of qualified potential appointees for augmentation(s).
c. The college promotion and tenure committee’s discussion and vote on a candidate for promotion to associate professor will be limited to those members of the committee who are from outside the candidate's department/school. The discussion and vote on a candidate for promotion to professor will be limited to those members of the committee who hold the rank of professor and who are from outside the candidate’s department/school. A committee member shall not be present or otherwise participate in the discussion reg...
Review Committees. 1. A Committee (the “Review Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of three (3) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting aircraft maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the Review Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
2. A Committee (the “GSE/Facilities Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of three (3) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting ground service equipment and facilities maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the GSE/Facilities Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
Review Committees. 1. A Committee (the “Review Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of six (6) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting aircraft maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the Review Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
2. A Committee (the “GSE/Facilities Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of six (6) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting ground service equipment and facilities maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the GSE/Facilities Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
3. A Committee (the “FST Review Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of three (3) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting flight training maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the FST Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
Review Committees. 1. A Committee (the “Review Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of three (3) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting aircraft maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the Review Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
2. A Committee (the “GSE Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of three (3) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting ground service equipment, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the GSE Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
Review Committees. 1. A Committee (the “Review Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of six (6) members each, shall meet at least quar- terly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting aircraft maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the Review Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or con- fidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
2. A Committee (the “GSE/Facilities Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of six (6) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s current practice and future plan for contracting ground ser- vice equipment and facilities maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and economically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the GSE/ Facilities Committee, upon request, information necessary to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under standard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
3. A Committee (the “FST Review Committee”) consisting of equal numbers of Company and Union representatives, with a maximum of three (3) members each, shall meet at least quarterly for the purpose of discussing the Company’s cur- rent practice and future plan for contracting flight training maintenance, including opportunities for efficiently and eco- nomically increasing work done in-house. The Company will provide the FST Committee, upon request, information nec- xxxxxx to facilitate these discussions. Proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information shall be reviewed under xxxx- dard confidentiality agreements at the Company’s request.
Review Committees. Tenure Review Committees shall be constituted identically to the positions outlined in the Audition Committees defined in Article 14, with the exception of Tenure Review Committees for section Violin, section Xxxxx, section Cello and section Bass which shall be increased as follows:
15.3.1 Violin: Four (4) additional tenured members of the Violin Section serving in rotation based on alphabetical order by last name tracked by the Personnel Office. In addition, all tenured members of the violin section will cast a "yes, no, or abstain" vote through secret ballot, which may include an online voting mechanism. The vote count will be duly considered by the Tenure Review Committee when making their final decision.
15.3.2 Xxxxx: Four (4) additional tenured members of the Xxxxx Section serving in rotation based on alphabetical order by last name tracked by the Personnel Office.
15.3.3 Cello: Four (4) additional tenured members of the Cello Section serving in rotation based on alphabetical order by last name tracked by the Personnel Office.
Review Committees member shall not participate in the discussion and vote with respect to a candidate to whom the Faculty member is related, as defined by the SIUC Nepotism Policy. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Board policies or operating papers, the following provisions shall be applicable to both the promotion and tenure process:
Review Committees. 55.1 This clause sets out provisions for the composition and procedures of committees to review unsatisfactory performance, serious misconduct and academic redundancy decisions.
55.2 The review committee will comprise a nominee of the University, a nominee of the relevant union and a chairperson who is mutually agreed by the parties within 5 working days.
55.3 Where the relevant union declines to nominate a member of the review committee within 5 working days of a request to do so, the Chair of the Board of The Faculties or the Chair of the Board of the Institute of Advanced Studies will nominate a member in lieu of a union nominee.
55.4 The review committee will be convened within 5 working days of the matter being referred to the review committee chair and will report to the Vice-Chancellor within 15 working days.
55.5 The Vice-Chancellor may grant an extension of time if asked by the chair of the review committee. Where the Vice-Chancellor declines such a request, the committee will have 5 working days from receipt of such advice to conclude its deliberations and report to the Vice-Chancellor.
Review Committees. 45.1. The Committees referred to in sub-clauses 23.7 (Probation Appeal Committee); 42.9 (Unsatisfactory Performance Review Committee); and 43.9 (Misconduct/Serious Misconduct Review Committee) shall consist of three members as follows:
45.1.1. An academic staff member from within the University chosen by the Vice-Chancellor;
45.1.2. A staff representative nominated by the NTEU;
45.1.3. A chairperson chosen by the Vice-Chancellor from the pool of chairpersons established under this Clause. In choosing the academic staff member and chairperson the Vice-Chancellor will also have regard to attempting to ensure that both genders are represented on a committee.
45.2. A pool of chairpersons for the purposes of providing chairpersons for the committees referred to above will be agreed between the NTEU Wollongong Branch and the University. Should the existing pool be exhausted or where specific or specialist expertise or knowledge is needed, a chairperson will be agreed between the NTEU Wollongong branch and the University.
Review Committees a. If a Continuing Appointee does not meet the requirements set forth in her/his written remediation plan provided for under B.3 and an academic review takes place, a committee shall review and make recommendations about NSF performance. The committee shall be at the Departmental level, except where not practicable, in which case it will be as close to the departmental level as is practicable (e.g. school, division or college). Such committees will be comprised of academic appointees with sufficient knowledge of the NSF’s field of expertise.
b. The University shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that a qualified NSF will participate on such review committees although no individual shall be required to serve on the committee. Unless the NSF on the committee is a standing appointee, the NSF being reviewed shall be consulted about the NSF appointment on the committee. Care shall be taken to ensure that the committee is composed of faculty who can offer a neutral assessment of the NSF’s performance. The NSF on the review committee shall be under the same obligation as any other member of the personnel committee with respect to the confidentiality of the review process.
