RISK SHARE ARRANGEMENTS. 8.1 The areas of risk are under or overspending of budgets within Better Care Fund budget lines and exceeding affordable levels of care outside the Better Care Fund. 8.2 As part of the initial development of the BCF pooled budget a number of risks were identified where the individual schemes would potentially result in additional demand for services and/or additional costs, or the required efficiencies and reductions do not materialise to the extent planned. The pooled budget in total includes an amount of £0.5m as a risk pool. In applying the risk pool funding it is important to have a jointly agreed approach. 8.3 It is proposed that the BCF Executive Group is the forum where decisions on the application of risk pool funding for either pool is made. 8.4 Risk is attributable pro rata to the proportion of that scheme commissioned by each partner organisation. This is to reflect where the levers for change and control sit. Similarly, where the scheme is joint and there is one lead commissioner, the risk should be shared pro-rata to the proportion of each partners contribution, subject to the maximum level of funding each partner contributes to the scheme unless agreed by the Chief Finance Officer of the SYICB (Rotherham Place) and the Strategic Director of Finance and Customer Services of the Council prior to any additional expenditure being incurred (paragraph 6.3).
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Call Off Partnership Agreement / Work Order, Call Off Partnership Agreement / Work Order, Call Off Partnership Agreement / Work Order
RISK SHARE ARRANGEMENTS. 8.1 The areas of risk are under or overspending of budgets within Better Care Fund budget lines and exceeding affordable levels of care outside the Better Care Fund.
8.2 As part of the initial development of the BCF pooled budget a number of risks were identified where the individual schemes would potentially result in additional demand for services and/or additional costs, or the required efficiencies and reductions do not materialise to the extent planned. The pooled budget in total includes an amount of £0.5m as a risk pool. In applying the risk pool funding it is important to have a jointly agreed approach.
8.3 It is proposed that the BCF Executive Group is the forum where decisions on the application of risk pool funding for either pool is made.
8.4 Risk is attributable to the scheme commissioner pro rata to the proportion of that scheme commissioned by each partner organisationcommissioned. This is to reflect where the levers for change and control sit. Similarly, where the scheme is joint and there is one lead commissioner, the risk should be shared pro-rata to the proportion of each partners contributionthat scheme commissioned, subject to the maximum level of funding each partner contributes to the scheme pool unless agreed by the Chief Finance Officer of the SYICB (Rotherham Place) CCG and the Strategic Director of Finance and Customer Services of the Council prior to any additional expenditure being incurred (paragraph 6.3).
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Better Care Fund Call Off Partnership Agreement/ Work Order, Better Care Fund Call Off Partnership Agreement/ Work Order
RISK SHARE ARRANGEMENTS. 8.1 The areas of risk are under or overspending of budgets within Better Care Fund budget lines and exceeding affordable levels of care outside the Better Care Fund.
8.2 As part of the initial development of the BCF pooled budget a number of risks were identified where the individual schemes would potentially result in additional demand for services and/or additional costs, or the required efficiencies and reductions do not materialise to the extent planned. The pooled budget in total includes an amount of £0.5m as a risk pool. In applying the risk pool funding it is important to have a jointly agreed approach.
8.3 It is proposed that the BCF Executive Group is the forum where decisions on the application of risk pool funding for either pool is made.
8.4 Risk is attributable pro rata to the proportion of that scheme commissioned by each partner organisation. This is to reflect where the levers for change and control sit. Similarly, where the scheme is joint and there is one lead commissioner, the risk should be shared pro-rata to the proportion of each partners contribution, subject to the maximum level of funding each partner contributes to the scheme unless agreed by the Chief Finance Officer of the SYICB (Rotherham Place) CCG and the Strategic Director of Finance and Customer Services of the Council prior to any additional expenditure being incurred (paragraph 6.3).
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Better Care Fund Call Off Partnership Agreement/ Work Order