Common use of RO Review Documentation and Checklist Clause in Contracts

RO Review Documentation and Checklist. The RO must document the reason for the RO decision in the RO Actuarial Change Request Checklist section of the ROE request and sub request screens (see Exhibit 7) for each WA request received, determine the appropriate WA request type(s) (see Exhibit 6A), and complete all checklist entries. The RO must review the documentation submitted with the WA request and identify for each checklist item if the documentation is complete, incomplete, or not applicable, for each applicable WA request type. Provide any additional comments in the comments section. The checklist is considered verified complete and accurate by the first reviewer and second reviewer once the WA is certified by the second reviewer. The first reviewer is the RO specialist that made the determination and originated the WA. The second reviewer is the approving authority designated by the RO Director. Designated approving authorities should be limited to RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and Senior Risk Management Specialists. The RO Director may designate staff other than those previously listed as the second reviewer only when the RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and a Senior Risk Management Specialist are not available.

RO Review Documentation and Checklist. The RO must document the reason for the RO decision in the RO Actuarial Change Request Checklist section of the ROE XXX request and sub request screens (see Exhibit 7) for each WA request received, determine the appropriate WA request type(s) (see Exhibit 6A), and complete all checklist entries. The RO must review the documentation submitted with the WA request and identify for each checklist item if the documentation is complete, incomplete, or not applicable, for each applicable WA request type. Provide any additional comments in the comments section. The checklist is considered verified complete and accurate by the first reviewer and second reviewer once the WA is certified by the second reviewer. The first reviewer is the RO specialist that made the determination and originated the WA. The second reviewer is the approving authority designated by the RO Director. Designated approving authorities should be limited to RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and Senior Risk Management Specialists. The RO Director may designate staff other than those previously listed as the second reviewer only when the RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and a Senior Risk Management Specialist are not available.

RO Review Documentation and Checklist. The RO must document the reason for the RO decision in the RO Actuarial Change Request Checklist section of the ROE XXX request and sub request screens (see Exhibit 7) for each WA request received, determine the appropriate WA request type(s) (see Exhibit 6A), and complete all checklist entries. The RO must review the documentation submitted with the WA request and identify for each checklist item if the documentation is complete, incomplete, or not applicable, for each applicable WA request type. Provide any additional comments in the comments section. section.‌ The checklist is considered verified complete and accurate by the first reviewer and second reviewer once the WA is certified by the second reviewer. The first reviewer is the RO specialist that made the determination and originated the WA. The second reviewer is the approving authority designated by the RO Director. Designated approving authorities should be limited to RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and Senior Risk Management Specialists. The RO Director may designate staff other than those previously listed as the second reviewer only when the RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and a Senior Risk Management Specialist are not available.

RO Review Documentation and Checklist. ‌ The RO must document the reason for the RO decision in the RO Actuarial Change Request Checklist section of the ROE request and sub request screens (see Exhibit 7) for each WA request received, determine the appropriate WA request type(s) (see Exhibit 6A), and complete all checklist entries. The RO must review the documentation submitted with the WA request and identify for each checklist item if the documentation is complete, incomplete, or not applicable, for each applicable WA request type. Provide any additional comments in the comments section. The checklist is considered verified complete and accurate by the first reviewer and second reviewer once the WA is certified by the second reviewer. The first reviewer is the RO specialist that made the determination and originated the WA. The second reviewer is the approving authority designated by the RO Director. Designated approving authorities should be limited to RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and Senior Risk Management Specialists. The RO Director may designate staff other than those previously listed as the second reviewer only when the RO Director, RO Deputy Director, and a Senior Risk Management Specialist are not available.