Kesimpulan Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) merupakan bentuk kerjasama ekonomi bilateral antara Indonesia xxx Jepang yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kegiatan impor, ekspor xxx investasi di kedua negara. Kerangka perjanjian ini meliputi liberalisasi perdagangan, investasi, perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual, transparansi, anti-persaingan, memperdalam kerja xxxx, xxx menetapkan prosedur untuk menegakkan perjanjian. Perjanjian ini terjalin dilandasi oleh kepentingan nasional masing-masing negara. Adapun kepentingan nasional Indonesia dalam perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxx mengoptimalkan kerjasama antara Indonesia-Jepang, mendapat kepastian akses pasar di Jepang yang lebih luas berkat penurunan tarif, meningkatkan arus barang xxx xxxx, mendapatkan transfer teknologi, sebagai sektor penggerak, program kesejahteraan, xxx juga menjadi pusat pengembangan manufaktur. General Review semestinya diadakan lima tahun setelah dilaksanakannya perjanjian. namun Jepang menunda pelaksanaan kegiatan ini sampai diubahnya Peraturan Menteri Keuangan yang diklaim tidak sesuai dengan IJEPA. Padahal sebelumnya Indonesia sudah menawarkan Jepang agar memberi usulan terkait peraturan ini sebelum diterbitkan. Indonesia masih mengejar kepentingannya untuk memenuhi perundingan ulang terkait tarif bea masuk xxx tarif impor yang belum terlaksana secara efektif. Selain berkenaan tentang kepentingan nasional, Indonesia sebenarnya juga tidak menetapkan tujuan yang jelas yang akan dicapai dalam kerjasama ekonomi ini. Diplomasi ekonomi yang diupayakan indonesia dalam kerjasama ekonomi bilateral ini didasari oleh beberapa faktor seperti latar belakang sejarah, hubungan perdagangan xxxx xxxxxx menguntungkan, xxx juga kemajuan perekonomian Jepang. Indonesia juga bergantung kepada situasi ekonomi Jepang karena kegiatan impor,ekspor, xxx investasi yang berlangsung memberi dampak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia dilihat dari nilai perdagangan yang terus mengalami tren kenaikan. Meskipun menguntungkan,Indonesia harus terus bersikap tegas dalam melaksanakan perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxxx banyak kepentingan nasional dari kerjasama bilateral ini yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Melalui analisis komprehensif terhadap kendala yang tidak kondusif bagi Indonesia dalam tinjauan umum IJEPA. Indonesia akan melanjutkan upayanya untuk mewujudkan kepentingan nasionalnya melalui kerja sama ini. Kerja sama ini diharapkan dapat terus meningkatkan hubungan baik perekonomian antara Indonesia-Jepang. DAFTAR PUSTAKA Anggraeni, N. A. (2020). DIPLOMASI EKONOMI JEPANG DALAM UPAYA PERPINDAHAN LIMBAH B3 MELALUI INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations, 3(2), 156-172. Ardiyanti, S. T. (2015). Dampak Perjanjian Perdagangan Indonesia - Jepang (Ijepa) Terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan Bilateral. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 9(2), 129–151. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.30908/bilp.v9i2. 5 Arifin Rivai, A. N. (2017). Posisi Indonesia di Tengah Fenomena Korporasi Global (Studi Kasus: Relasi Dagang Indonesia – Toyota Pasca Kesepakatan IJEPA). Indonesian Perspective, 2(2), 105. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.14710/ip.v2i2.18 474 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. (2019). Faktor Penghambat Peningkatan Investasi Jepang di Indonesia dalam Kerangka Kerja IJEPA 208-2018. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Gocklas C.S, L., & Sulasmiyati, S. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) Terhadap Nilai Perdagangan Indonesia-Jepang (Studi Pada Badan Pusat Statistik 2000-2016). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB)|Vol, 50(5), 191–200. xxxxx://xxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/media/pub lications/188892-ID-analisis- pengaruh-indonesia-japan- econom.pdf Hadi, S. (2014). Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: an Indonesian Perspective. East Asian Policy, 06(03), 114–128. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1142/s17939305 14000312 Harahap, I. K., & Xxxxxx, A. M. (2015). DAMPAK PENERAPAN INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TERHADAP EKSPOR INDONESIA KE JEPANG. Media Ekonomi, 23(1), 27. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.25105/me.v23i1. 0000 Xxxxxx, X. S. (2016). KEGAGALAN INDONESIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI INDONESIAN JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal Lyceum, 4(1), 430–439. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Analisis Review Indonesia Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) dalam Perdagangan Barang. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1108/eb057810
COMMUNICATION BETWEEN YOU AND XXXXX 24.1 Subject to any applicable laws, the Licensee authorised XXXXX to communicate with it by means of telephone, e-mail, fax, text or any mobile phone messaging services to the Licensees mobile device, laptop and/or computer.
Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex Gov. Code 2271) If (a) Vendor is not a sole proprietorship; (b) Vendor has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this Agreement or any agreement with a TIPS Member under this procurement has value of $100,000 or more, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Vendor certifies, where applicable, that neither the Vendor, nor any affiliate, subsidiary, or parent company of Vendor, if any, boycotts Israel, and Vendor agrees that Vendor and Vendor Companies will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “boycott” shall mean and include refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with Israel, or with a person or entity doing business in Israel or in an Israeli-controlled territory but does not include an action made for ordinary business purposes. When applicable, does Vendor certify? Yes
NEPOTISM DISCLOSURE A. In this section the term “relative” means:
NO HARDSTOP/PASSIVE LICENSE MONITORING Unless an Authorized User is otherwise specifically advised to the contrary in writing at the time of order and prior to purchase, Contractor hereby warrants and represents that the Product and all Upgrades do not and will not contain any computer code that would disable the Product or Upgrades or impair in any way its operation based on the elapsing of a period of time, exceeding an authorized number of copies, advancement to a particular date or other numeral, or other similar self-destruct mechanisms (sometimes referred to as “time bombs,” “time locks,” or “drop dead” devices) or that would permit Contractor to access the Product to cause such disablement or impairment (sometimes referred to as a “trap door” device). Contractor agrees that in the event of a breach or alleged breach of this provision that Authorized User shall not have an adequate remedy at law, including monetary damages, and that Authorized User shall consequently be entitled to seek a temporary restraining order, injunction, or other form of equitable relief against the continuance of such breach, in addition to any and all remedies to which Authorized User shall be entitled.
Xxxxx, Haldimand, Norfolk (a) An employee shall be granted five working days bereavement leave with pay upon the death of the employee’s spouse, child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, legal guardian, grandchild or step-grandchild.
XXXXXXXX ANTI-KICKBACK ACT (a) The Sub-Recipient hereby agrees that, unless exempt under Federal law, it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification thereof, the following clause:
PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTS WITH COMPANIES BOYCOTTING ISRAEL CERTIFICATION As required by Chapter 2271 of the Texas Local Government Code the Contractor must verify that it 1) does not boycott Israel; and 2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the Contract. Pursuant to Section 2271.001, Texas Government Code:
Limited Disclosure Enanta and Xxxxxx each agrees (a) that disclosure of its Confidential Information or any transfer of its Proprietary Materials may be made by the other Party to any employee, consultant, director or Affiliate of such other Party to enable such other Party to exercise its rights or to carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement; provided that any such disclosure or transfer shall only be made to Persons who are bound by written obligations as described in Section 7.1.3, and (b) disclosure of its Confidential Information may be made by the other Party (1) on a need-to-know basis to such other Party’s legal and financial advisors, or (ii) as reasonably necessary in connection with an actual or potential (A) permitted sublicense of such other Party’s rights hereunder, (B) debt or equity financing of such other Party or (C) Change of Control involving such other Party, provided, in any case, the Person receiving such Confidential Information of the other Party agrees in writing to maintain the confidentiality of such Confidential Information of the other Party with terms at least as restrictive as those contained in Section 7.1.1. In addition, each Party agrees that the other Party may disclose such Party’s Confidential Information (a) as reasonably necessary to file, prosecute or maintain Patent Rights, or to file, prosecute or defend litigation related to Patent Rights, in accordance with this Agreement or (b) as required by Applicable Laws; provided that, in the case of any disclosure under this clause (b), the Disclosing Party shall (i) provide the other Party with written notice not less than five (5) business days prior to such disclosure and provide the other Party with an opportunity to comment on any such required disclosure, (ii) if requested by such other Party, seek, or cooperate in all reasonable respects with such other Party’s efforts to obtain, confidential treatment or a protective order with respect to any such disclosure to the extent available at such other Party’s expense, and (iii) use good faith efforts to incorporate the comments of such other Party in any such disclosure or request for confidential treatment or protective order.
Nepotism No employee shall be awarded a position where he/she is to be directly supervised by a member of his/her immediate family. “
