Siting Criteria and Considerations Sample Clauses

Siting Criteria and Considerations. Different regulatory organizations have attempted to improve the likelihood of an infiltration pond functioning properly by developing criteria that must be met before a pond location is selected. The common thread in these criteria is that infiltration ponds function best when the soil is highly permeable, the slope of the infiltration surface is low, and the pond is high above the water table. Specifically, the Department of Ecology requires the soil infiltration rate to be at least 0.5 in/hr (1.3 cm/hr), the slope to be no greater than 15 percent, and the bottom of an infiltration facility to be a minimum of 5 feet (1.5 meters) from the seasonal high water mark (WDOE, 2001). The provision for the minimum distance to the water table is in place as an effort to avoid the low hydraulic gradients that develop when the wetting front from the infiltration pond reaches the water table. These types of requirements are similar to those used in other states and jurisdictions. For example, the design guidelines prepared by the State of Maryland (2000) state that the bottom must be 4 feet (1.2 meters) from the water table, the infiltration rate may not be lower than 0.52 in/hr (1.3 cm/hr), and the slope must be less than 20 percent. The approach used to site infiltration ponds developed by the Swedish Association of Water and Sewage Works is based on a point system (Stahre and Xxxxxxx, 1990). Points are assigned to potential sites according to the ratio between the tributary connected impervious area and the infiltration area, the nature of the surface and underlying soils, the slope of the infiltration surface, the vegetation cover, and the degree of traffic on the surface. Sites with high scores are considered suitable, whereas sites that score low are not considered.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Siting Criteria and Considerations

  • GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SECTOR SPECIFIC ALLOWANCES, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant: Where the company does work which falls under the following headings, the company agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • General Considerations a. All reports, drawings, designs, specifications, notebooks, computations, details, and calculation documents prepared by Vendor and presented to the Board pursuant to this Agreement are and remain the property of the Board as instruments of service.

  • Additional Considerations For each mediation or arbitration:

  • RISK CONSIDERATION There are no significant risks associated with the recommendations contained within this report. This application may be considered under existing MPS policies. Community Council has the discretion to make decisions that are consistent with the MPS, and such decisions may be appealed to the N.S. Utility and Review Board. Information concerning risks and other implications of adopting the proposed development agreement are contained within the Discussion section of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS No environmental implications are identified.

  • Tax Considerations The Company has advised Recipient to seek Recipient’s own tax and financial advice with regard to the federal and state tax considerations resulting from Recipient’s receipt of the Award and Recipient’s receipt of the Shares upon Settlement of the vested portion of the Award. Recipient understands that the Company, to the extent required by law, will report to appropriate taxing authorities the payment to Recipient of compensation income upon the Settlement of RSUs under the Award and Recipient shall be solely responsible for the payment of all federal and state taxes resulting from such Settlement.

  • Requirements Pertaining Only to Federal Grants and Subrecipient Agreements If this Agreement is a grant that is funded in whole or in part by Federal funds:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.