Special Criteria Sample Clauses

The 'Special Criteria' clause defines specific conditions or requirements that must be met for certain aspects of an agreement to apply or remain valid. This may include qualifications, certifications, performance standards, or other benchmarks that parties must satisfy, such as maintaining a particular license or meeting minimum quality thresholds. By clearly outlining these unique requirements, the clause ensures that only parties or actions meeting the designated standards are permitted, thereby reducing ambiguity and helping to manage risk within the contractual relationship.
Special Criteria. 10.6.8.1 If there are insufficient funds to enable all qualifying leaves to be granted, the following weighting factors shall be applied: 10.6.8.1.1 Weight and significance of the proposed activity in terms of the standards of the field in which it is planned; the more weight or significance, the higher the priority. 10.6.8.1.2 Clarity of the planned program; the greater the clarity, the higher the priority. 10.6.8.1.3 Total length of previous paid leaves; the shorter the leave, the higher the priority. 10.6.8.1.4 Length of employment since a previous paid leave; the greater the length of intervening employment, the higher the priority. 10.6.8.1.5 Equalization of leave opportunity among individual Employees in different Departments; priority shall be given to leaves which tend to equalize opportunity. 10.6.8.1.6 The rarity of occurrence of the planned activity; e.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Special Criteria. In addition to the criteria mentioned in 21.02 (b), the following shall obtain in the Faculties or Departments named: (i) In the Department of Film Studies, Dramatic and Visual Arts and the Department of Music, such special criteria may include: (1) live performances (solo or ensemble) of works for the public; (2) broadcasts, exhibits, recordings, films, video and media works and events, etc., for the public; (3) editing and/or direction of public performances; (4) adjudication of festivals and competitions, master classes, consultation on curricula, workshops at the post-secondary level or with professional orchestras, theatres, or galleries, NFB, CBC, etc., and (5) creativity in directing, performing, or composing, particularly when recognized by competent critics in the press or in broadcasting. (ii) In the Faculty of Education, such special criteria may include: (1) the extent of participation and effectiveness in departmental, University, regional, national and international committees and other organizations; (2) the extent of participation and effectiveness in consultation and in presentation and preparation of workshops and clinics, and of materials for professionals at regional and provincial, national and international levels; and (3) demonstrated effectiveness in carrying out administrative duties unique to the Faculty.
View Source
Special Criteria. In addition to the criteria mentioned in 21.02 (b), the following special criteria shall apply where appropriate: (i) live performances (solo or ensemble) of works for the public; (ii) broadcasts, exhibits, recordings, films, video and media works and events, etc., for the public; (iii) editing and/or direction of public performances; (iv) adjudication of festivals and competitions, master classes, consultation on curricula, workshops at the post-secondary level or with professional orchestras, theatres, or galleries, NFB, CBC, etc.; and (v) creativity in directing, performing, or composing, particularly when recognized by competent critics in the press or in broadcasting. In the Faculty of Education, such special criteria may include: (vi) the extent of participation and effectiveness in departmental, University, regional, national and international committees and other organizations; (vii) the extent of participation and effectiveness in consultation and in presentation and preparation of workshops and clinics, and of materials for professionals at regional and provincial, national and international levels; and (viii) demonstrated effectiveness in carrying out administrative duties unique to the Faculty.
View Source

Related to Special Criteria

  • General Criteria (a) If general criteria are required as part of the Application, only one (1) set shall be completed. General criteria measure the quality of the Land Manager’s overall OHV program. The Applicants shall answer these questions with respect to the entirety of the OHV operation, including all trails and areas available for OHV Recreation, not just specific Projects or Project Areas. (b) General criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) OHV Opportunity and services provided, (2) Agency contribution to the overall cost of managing and delivering the OHV Opportunity, (3) Management of natural and Cultural Resources, (4) Effective education of rules/regulations, and (5) Past performance in completing and administering ▇▇▇▇▇ funded Projects. (c) Non-land manager Applicants required to complete the general criteria shall cooperate with the Land Manager(s) to obtain the information necessary to complete the general criteria section of the Application. Note: Authority cited: Sections 5001.5 and 5003, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 5024.1, 5090.32 and 5090.50, Public Resources Code.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)