Common use of Standards for Promotion Clause in Contracts

Standards for Promotion. 7.4.1. Promotion in rank for tenure-track and tenured faculty members is based upon performance. Any faculty member may perform satisfactorily at a given academic rank without necessarily warranting promotion to a higher one. It also is recognized that a period of time shall elapse after a promotion, during which time further promotion is not normally to be expected. A faculty member may request a promotion review in accordance with established deadlines set by the Xxxxxxx’x office. In addition, faculty members whose performance merits consideration for promotion may be invited by the Chair/Director to submit credentials for promotion review. 7.4.2. The criteria and standards for the ranks of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor are set forth in Section 2. More precise statements of what is expected for promotion under teaching/librarian effectiveness, scholarly/creative activity, and service may be specified by the tenured faculty members in individual academic units (Section 5.1). All such statements must be approved by the Xxxx and by the Xxxxxxx. 7.4.3. At the initiation of the University or unit faculty, the unit faculty may amend the unit’s TTF promotion policy at any time, with the concurrence of the Chair/Director, Xxxx, and Xxxxxxx. Changes in the criteria and standards for promotion may not be applied retroactively to TTF members unless requested in writing by the TTF member prior to the initiation of the review process. The Xxxx and Xxxxxxx (or their designees) shall work collaboratively with the unit faculty and the Chair/Director during the policy revision process. 7.4.3.1. Following the approval of new promotion standards in a new RTP policy, BUFMs applying for promotion from Associate Professor to Professor shall have the option to elect to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s “Old RTP Policy” or “New RTP Policy.” 7.4.3.2. BUFMs currently holding the rank of Associate Professor and who intend to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s New RTP Policy must elect whether the department’s/school’s Old RTP Policy or New RTP Policy shall govern their promotion application. Faculty applying for promotion must notify the Chair/Director of their election not later than September 30th following the implementation of a new RTP policy. If no timely election is made, then the faculty member’s promotion consideration shall be governed by the Old RTP Policy. 7.4.3.3. Once the election specified in Section 7.4.3.2 has been made, or the time for doing so has lapsed without such an election being made, Associate Professors who elect to have their applications governed by the Old RTP Policy (or have the decision made for them by failing to make the required election) shall have eight

Standards for Promotion. 7.4.16.4.1. Promotion in rank for tenure-track and tenured faculty members is based upon performance. Any faculty member may perform satisfactorily at a given academic rank without necessarily warranting promotion to a higher one. It also is recognized that a period of time shall elapse after a promotion, during which time further promotion is not normally to be expected. A faculty member may request a promotion review in accordance with established deadlines set by the Xxxxxxx’x office. In addition, faculty members whose performance merits consideration for promotion may be invited by the Chair/Director to submit credentials for promotion review. 7.4.26.4.2. The criteria and standards for the ranks of Assistant Professorassistant professor, Associate Professorassociate professor, and Professor professor are set forth in Section 23. More precise statements of what is expected for promotion under teaching/librarian effectiveness, scholarly/creative activity, and service may be specified by the tenured faculty members in individual academic units (Section 5.16.5.1). All such statements must be approved by the Xxxx and by the Xxxxxxx. 7.4.36.4.3. At the initiation of the University or unit faculty, the unit faculty may amend the unit’s TTF promotion policy at any time, with the concurrence of the Chair/Director, Xxxx, and Xxxxxxx. Changes in the criteria and standards for promotion may not be applied retroactively to TTF members unless requested in writing by the TTF member prior to the initiation of the review process. The Xxxx and Xxxxxxx (or their designees) shall work collaboratively with the unit faculty and the Chair/Director during the policy revision process. 7.4.3.16.4.3.1. Following the approval of new promotion standards in a new RTP policy, BUFMs applying for promotion from Associate Professor associate to Professor full professor shall have the option to elect to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s “Old RTP Policy” or “New RTP Policy.” 7.4.3.26.4.3.2. BUFMs currently holding the rank of Associate Professor associate professor and who intend to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s New RTP Policy must elect whether the department’s/school’s Old RTP Policy or New RTP Policy shall govern their promotion application. Faculty applying for promotion must notify the Chair/Director of their election not later than September 30th following the implementation of a new RTP policy. If no timely election is made, then the faculty member’s promotion consideration shall be governed by the Old RTP Policy. 7.4.3.36.4.3.3. Once the election specified in Section 7.4.3.2 6.4.3.2 has been made, or the time for doing so has lapsed without such an election being made, Associate Professors associate professors who elect to have their applications governed by the Old RTP Policy (or have the decision made for them by failing to make the required election) shall have eight

Standards for Promotion. 7.4.16.4.1. Promotion in rank for tenure-track and tenured faculty members is based upon performance. Any faculty member may perform satisfactorily at a given academic rank without necessarily warranting promotion to a higher one. It also is recognized that a period of time shall elapse after a promotion, during which time further promotion is not normally to be expected. A faculty member may request a promotion review in accordance with established deadlines set by the Xxxxxxx’x office. In addition, faculty members whose performance merits consideration for promotion may be invited by the Chair/Director to submit credentials for promotion review. 7.4.26.4.2. The criteria and standards for the ranks of Assistant Professorassistant professor, Associate Professorassociate professor, and Professor professor are set forth in Section 23. More precise statements of what is expected for promotion under teaching/librarian effectiveness, scholarly/creative activity, and service may be specified by the tenured faculty members in individual academic units (Section 5.16.5.1). All such statements must be approved by the Xxxx and by the Xxxxxxx. 7.4.36.4.3. At the initiation of the University or unit faculty, the unit faculty may amend the unit’s TTF promotion policy at any time, with the concurrence of the Chair/Director, Xxxx, and Xxxxxxx. Changes in the criteria and standards for promotion may not be applied retroactively to TTF members unless requested in writing by the TTF member prior to the initiation of the review process. The Xxxx and Xxxxxxx (or their designees) shall work collaboratively with the unit faculty and the Chair/Director during the policy revision process. 7.4.3.16.4.3.1. Following the approval of new promotion standards in a new RTP policy, BUFMs applying for promotion from Associate Professor associate to Professor full professor shall have the option to elect to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s “Old RTP Policy” or “New RTP Policy.” 7.4.3.26.4.3.2. BUFMs XXXXx currently holding the rank of Associate Professor associate professor and who intend to apply for promotion under their department’s/school’s New RTP Policy must elect whether the department’s/school’s Old RTP Policy or New RTP Policy shall govern their promotion application. Faculty applying for promotion must notify the Chair/Director of their election not later than September 30th following the implementation of a new RTP policy. If no timely election is made, then the faculty member’s promotion consideration shall be governed by the Old RTP Policy. 7.4.3.36.4.3.3. Once the election specified in Section 7.4.3.2 6.4.3.2 has been made, or the time for doing so has lapsed without such an election being made, Associate Professors associate professors who elect to have their applications governed by the Old RTP Policy (or have the decision made for them by failing to make the required election) shall have eight