Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 These breaches will not recur because the obligation was specific to the date 1 April 2015.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 The incorrect connection was made during the major OTB outage, which took place from October 2008 to January 2009. The metering and protection assemblies were taken apart to remove the generator and had been re- assembled after the outage. OTB had only been back in service for a few weeks when the transmission line fault exposed the protection problem.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 On 12 February 2010, the MRPL trader immediately advised the System Operator of the mistake and the System Operator determined that there was no immediate risk to the grid. MRPL had also advised the System Operator that best endeavours would be made to keep the output at minimum for the remainder of the trading period.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 Southpark has:
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 The grid owner is reviewing the wider design, settings, and testing aspects of its protection systems.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 The grid owner will review protection coordination settings with other asset owners where feeders may have been paralleled.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 The grid owner’s service provider provided interim support by way of a senior technician to mentor incumbent technicians.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 The parties agree in this Agreement to use the process, subsequently developed by the Commission, to transfer ICPs between Networks. This will avoid any issues caused by the method of decommissioning existing ICPs and creating new ICPs on new Networks.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 5.1 To prevent recurrence, the grid owner will:
Steps taken to prevent recurrence. 6.1 The system operator has a documented process for updating contracts with ancillary service providers. The system operator has advised that it appears from its records that it did not communicate the amended contract information to the necessary parties within the system operator. The system operator is unclear why this would have occurred, but considers this may be attributed to uncertainty as to which part of the system operator was responsible for coordinating the actions relating to amended ancillary services contracts.
