The Process. A. To provide an opportunity for the non-federal Parties to provide input to the Secretary on the categories of data outlined in Section 1 above, there is established under the terms of this Settlement a Technical Coordination Committee (TCC) consisting of membership from all of the non-Federal Parties to this Settlement. The TCC will meet or hold conference calls on a monthly basis, at a minimum, and more often as deemed necessary. The TCC will also form sub-teams and hold separate workshops/meetings as necessary to address specific technical and scientific issues. The principal objective of the TCC will be to exchange information and data, as appropriate, among the non-federal Parties on technical aspects of the Secretarial Determination that may affect the resources of the non-federal Parties and provide input to the Federal Parties. The Federal Parties will hold public workshops or otherwise provide Timely information to the TCC and the public concerning the status of the Determination, the studies in support of the Determination and the environmental compliance actions. To the extent practicable and in accordance with Applicable Law, the Federal Parties will provide the information necessary for the non-federal Parties to have Timely and meaningful input consistent with the schedule for completing the Secretarial Determination. The TCC will provide its input in writing to the Federal Parties for their consideration, consistent with the Coordination Process.
B. The Parties may participate in the NEPA process as cooperating agencies, if eligible under the applicable Federal regulations and guidance, or as members of the public.
C. Nothing in this Settlement shall restrict the Department of the Interior or other Federal agency from providing funding through other agreements or memoranda of understanding.
The Process. 12.1.1 The PC may make decisions to resolve an issue if:
(a) the parents cannot agree on the matter,
(b) one parent chooses not to participate in mediation; or
(c) time constraints make it impossible to reach an agreement.
12.1.2 The PC shall advise the parents in writing that they are now engaged in Arbitration. The format of the “hearing” will be determined by the PC after hearing the parents’ submissions and considering all the circumstances. The hearing may be conducted in person, by telephone, e-mail, online, in writing or other means. If either party requests an oral hearing, the PC will conduct one either in person or online, in the PC’s discretion.
12.1.3 Any challenge to the PC’s jurisdiction shall be determined by the PC after considering the submissions of each parent.
12.1.4 The PC shall provide both parents with notice of the time, place and procedure for the hearing. All procedures will be determined by the PC depending on the circumstances. If a parent fails to participate, comply with timelines, provide evidence or submissions, or respond to the other’s evidence or submissions, the PC may proceed in the absence of that parent or their input.
12.1.5 Subject to ongoing screening obligation, all oral and written communication during the arbitration shall occur in the presence of or with notice to both parents. No recording shall be made of the arbitration hearing.
12.1.6 The parents are advised to seek legal advice before and to involve a lawyer throughout the arbitration.
The Process. Sun and other JCP members have established a formal process (“Process”) for the development of high quality Java Specifications and promoting the development and distribution of com- patible implementations of those specifications. The Process is described on the JCP Web Site (currently Version 2.1 of July 10, 2001 at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx), and may be revised from time to time in accordance with terms set forth in the Process document, provided that no such revisions shall apply to any JSR that has already been approved for development. Upon execution of this Agreement by the parties, You are autho- rized to participate in accordance with the Process (through an employee or other agent designated by and authorized to act on Your behalf) with respect to any JSR commenced once this version of the JSPA is avail- able. Should you wish to participate in the Process with respect to a JSR commenced before this version of the JSPA was available for execution, you must execute the version of the JSPA applicable to that JSR (con- tact the PMO to obtain a copy). This Agreement shall control in the event of any conflict between it and the Process. Any capitalized terms used herein and not defined in Section 1 above are as defined in the Process document.
The Process. The Five Councils will hold a “Client” account and a “Partnership” account • Costs chargeable to the “Partnership” account (taking into account the three & Five partner splits detailed in 2.1 above) are: o Employee related expenses o Transport related expenses o Premises related expenses o Supplies and services o Any Support Service costs agreed in advance by the Five Councils as chargeable to the “Partnership” account because of the obvious service/benefit provided o Any income that is received in respect of costs that are chargeable to the “Partnership” account. • Costs chargeable to the “Client” account are: o Support Services not specifically agreed as chargeable to the “Partnership” account o Income not received in respect of costs that are chargeable to the “Partnership” account o Corporate costs not directly attributable to the work of the 2015 Joint Committee and the ARP.
The Process a. An eligible individual who desires to be issued a continuing contract must file with the Central Office an "Application for Continuing Contract" which appears in Appendix R of this Master Agreement prior to September 11 of the year prior to the year in which the individual wishes to have his/her continuing contract take effect.
b. If a teacher becomes eligible for a continuing contract he/she may initiate and complete the application process as contained herein. Within ten (10) days of the filing of the application form with the Central Office but no later than September 11 (dependent upon whether all respective parties are available to meet), a meeting between the applicant, the administrator who will conduct the observation, and evaluation procedure, and the Superintendent shall occur. The purpose of such meeting will be to establish goals for the applicant to accomplish in accordance with the criteria listed in the observation/evaluation procedure. Such goals will be consistent with those established in the individual's prior observation/evaluation cycles. All resources necessary for assisting the applicant in successfully completing such goals will be provided by the Employer.
The Process. The requestor must provide, in writing, a description of the proposed activity and an explanation of why the activity is not incompatible under this Statement. The written material must describe the proposed activity in sufficient detail for the decision-maker to make a fully informed determination whether it is incompatible under this Statement. When making a determination under this subsection, the decision-maker may consider any relevant factors including, but not limited to, the impact on the requestor’s ability to perform his or her job, the impact upon the Department as a whole, compliance with applicable laws and rules and the spirit and intent of this Statement. The decision-maker shall consider all relevant written materials submitted by the requestor. The decision-maker shall also consider whether the written material provided by the requestor is sufficiently specific and detailed to enable the decision-maker to make a fully informed determination. The decision-maker may request additional information from the requestor if the decision-maker deems such information necessary. For an advance written determination request from an employee, if the General Manager delegates the decision-making to a designee and if the designee determines that the proposed activity is incompatible under this Statement, the employee may appeal that determination to the General Manager. The decision-maker shall respond to the request by providing a written determination to the requestor by mail, email, personal delivery, or other reliable means. For a request by an employee, the decision- maker shall provide the determination within a reasonable period of time depending on the circumstances and the complexity of the request, but not later than 20 working days from the date the request is received. If the decision-maker does not provide a written determination to the employee within 20 working days from the date the request is received, the decision-maker shall be deemed to have determined that the proposed activity does not violate this Statement. The decision-maker may revoke the written determination at any time based on changed facts or circumstances or other good cause, by providing advance written notice to the requestor. The written notice shall specify the changed facts or circumstances or other good cause that warrants revocation of the advance written determination.
The Process.
1. The school principal examines the report to determine the exact nature of the school’s low performance.
2. The appropriate intervention team is formed within 10 days of receiving the notice of low performance.
3. The team will Follow the interest-based process and ensure all participants are trained in the interest based process or IBPS.
4. The analysis is taken to the appropriate intervention team for discussion. The intervention team reviews the analysis and draws conclusions as to the cause(s) of the problem(s) and appropriate possible solutions.
5. The school intervention team meets to examine the Student Success Plan to determine what strategies worked and what strategies did not work according to statute.
6. The intervention team develops a Progress Plan that parallels the Student Success Plan and timeline.
7. Implementation and progress monitoring of student achievement is the responsibility of the monitoring team, which is comprised of the appropriate director, CFEA representative, psychometrician, and school principal. The monitoring team has the authority to reconvene the intervention team to address concerns that arise during the school year.
8. Collaboration is the theme!
The Process. 12.1.1 The PC may make decisions to resolve an issue if:
(a) the parents cannot agree on the matter,
(b) one parent chooses not to participate in mediation; or
(c) time constraints make it impossible to reach an agreement.
12.1.2 The PC shall advise the parents that they will be proceeding to arbitration, and may, in their sole discretion, re-screen the parents prior thereto. The details of the proceeding, including timing, schedule, format, procedure, documentary and submission requirements shall be determined by the PC after receiving submissions from the parents as is appropriate in the circumstances. The PC may issue Procedural Directions in their discretion to document the process to be followed.
The Process. 11.1.1 Either parent may request the assistance of the PC to resolve an issue. The timing, frequency, location and format of meetings shall be determined by the PC. Meetings may be conducted by telephone, online, e-mail, in writing or in person.
11.1.2 The PC may consult, meet with, and/or obtain information from third parties including the parents’ lawyers (together or separately), family members, third party caregivers, school personnel, therapists and health care professionals.
11.1.3 All mediation meetings are without prejudice settlement negotiations. Subject to 12.4 herein, (evidence from or about the children) disclosures made during mediation are inadmissible in the arbitration and in any future litigation or arbitration unless both parents agree otherwise in writing. No recordings shall be made of the mediation discussions.
The Process. 11.1.1 In the event that a dispute arises from or is related to this Agreement, the parties agree to attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiation or through another alternate dispute resolution process to which the parties agree and set out in writing.
