Common use of Superseding Effect Clause in Contracts

Superseding Effect. The Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, commitments, agreements, and writings, and expresses the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the payment of benefits upon a termination of Executive’s employment with the Company within one year following a Change in Control; provided, however, that the terms of any Benefit Plans will remain applicable to the particular Benefit Plan, except as expressly modified herein. All such other negotiations, commitments, agreements and writings will have no further force or effect, and the parties to any such other negotiation, commitment, agreement or writing will have no further rights or obligations thereunder. The parties agree and acknowledge that the definitions of terms applicable to this Agreement may be different than the definitions of those same terms in Benefit Plans and may result in seemingly contradictory results. The parties agree and acknowledge that such seemingly contradictory results are intended, and that this Agreement shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth herein and that the Benefit Plans shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth in the Benefit Plans, except as expressly modified herein.

Superseding Effect. The This Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, commitments, agreements, and writings, including without limitation the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 12, 2009, and expresses the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the payment of benefits upon a termination of Executive’s employment with by the Company within one year following a Change in ControlCompany; provided, however, that the terms of any Benefit Plans will remain applicable to the particular Benefit Plan, except as expressly modified herein. All such other negotiations, commitments, agreements and writings will have no further force or effect, and the parties to any such other negotiation, commitment, agreement or writing will have no further rights or obligations thereunder. The parties agree and acknowledge that the definitions of terms applicable to this Agreement may be different than the definitions of those same terms in Benefit Plans and may result in seemingly contradictory results. For example, a change in control under this Agreement may not constitute a change in control under the LTIP. The parties agree and acknowledge that such seemingly contradictory results are intended, and that this Agreement shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth herein and that the Benefit Plans shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth in the Benefit Plans, except as expressly modified herein.

Superseding Effect. The This Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, commitments, agreements, and writings, including without limitation the Prior Agreement, between the Company and Executive, and expresses the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the payment of benefits upon a termination of Executive’s employment with by the Company within one year following a Change in ControlCompany; provided, however, that the terms of any Benefit Plans will remain applicable to the particular Benefit Plan, except as expressly modified herein. All such other negotiations, commitments, agreements and writings will have no further force or effect, and the parties to any such other negotiation, commitment, agreement or writing will have no further rights or obligations thereunder. The parties agree and acknowledge that the definitions of terms applicable to this Agreement may be different than the definitions of those same terms in Benefit Plans and may result in seemingly contradictory results. The parties agree and acknowledge that such seemingly contradictory results are intended, and that this Agreement shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth herein and that the Benefit Plans shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth in the Benefit Plans, except as expressly modified herein.

Superseding Effect. The This Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, commitments, agreements, and writings, including without limitation the Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012, between the Company and Executive, and expresses the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the payment of benefits upon a termination of Executive’s employment with by the Company within one year following a Change in ControlCompany; provided, however, that the terms of any Benefit Plans will remain applicable to the particular Benefit Plan, except as expressly modified herein. All such other negotiations, commitments, agreements and writings will have no further force or effect, and the parties to any such other negotiation, commitment, agreement or writing will have no further rights or obligations thereunder. The parties agree and acknowledge that the definitions of terms applicable to this Agreement may be different than the definitions of those same terms in Benefit Plans and may result in seemingly contradictory results. For example, a change in control under this Agreement may not constitute a change in control under the LTIP. The parties agree and acknowledge that such seemingly contradictory results are intended, and that this Agreement shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth herein and that the Benefit Plans shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth in the Benefit Plans, except as expressly modified herein.

Superseding Effect. The Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, commitments, agreements, and writings, and expresses the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the payment of benefits upon a termination of Executive’s employment with the Company within one year six months following a Change in Control; provided, however, that the terms of any Benefit Plans will remain applicable to the particular Benefit Plan, except as expressly modified herein. All such other negotiations, commitments, agreements agreements, and writings will have no further force or effect, and the parties to any such other negotiation, commitment, agreement agreement, or writing will have no further rights or obligations thereunder. The parties agree and acknowledge that the definitions of terms applicable to this Agreement may be different than the definitions of those same terms in Benefit Plans and may result in seemingly contradictory results. For example, a change in control under this Agreement may not constitute a change in control under the Xxxxxx Products, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan. The parties agree and acknowledge that such seemingly contradictory results are intended, and that this Agreement shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth herein and that the Benefit Plans shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth in the Benefit Plans, except as expressly modified herein.

Superseding Effect. The This Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, commitments, agreements, and writings, including without limitation the Change in Control Agreement dated as of January 29, 2010, and expresses the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the payment of benefits upon a termination of Executive’s employment with by the Company within one year following a Change in ControlCompany; provided, however, that the terms of any Benefit Plans will remain applicable to the particular Benefit Plan, except as expressly modified herein. All such other negotiations, commitments, agreements and writings will have no further force or effect, and the parties to any such other negotiation, commitment, agreement or writing will have no further rights or obligations thereunder. The parties agree and acknowledge that the definitions of terms applicable to this Agreement may be different than the definitions of those same terms in Benefit Plans and may result in seemingly contradictory results. For example, a change in control under this Agreement may not constitute a change in control under the LTIP. The parties agree and acknowledge that such seemingly contradictory results are intended, and that this Agreement shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth herein and that the Benefit Plans shall be governed solely by the terms and definitions set forth in the Benefit Plans, except as expressly modified herein.