Common use of Table 7a Clause in Contracts

Table 7a. Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 1 HESA T1b - State School (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from state schools to 95.4% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 95.4% 94.5% 95% 95.4% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 2 HESA T1b - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2) (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from Low Participation Neighbourhoods to 15.5% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 15.5% 14.5% 15% 15.5% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 3 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To half the difference between the non- continuation rate for young full-time first degree entrants from LPNs and that for those from other neighbourhoods No 2009/10 3.5% 2.5% 2% 1.75% Non-continuation rate for those from LPNs in 2009/10 was 12.8% compared with 9.3% for other neibourhoods, resulting in the current 3.5% difference . 4 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To improve the retention statistics for LPN students by 3% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 12.8% 11% 10.3% 9.8% 5 Other statistic - Other (please give details in the next column) Improve employability (DHLE – employment and further study, all those responding) of those from social group 5, 6 & 7 (or family incomes below £25,000 pa) by reducing the gap to those from social groups 1, 2 & 3 from 7% (for 2008/9 graduates - published 2009/10) to 5% for the cohort of FT UG students entering in 2012. No 2009/10 7% 6% 5.5% 5% Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around outreach and student success work (including collaborative work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access, student success and progression. These should be measurable outcomes ‐based targets and should focus on the number of beneficiaries reached by a particular activity/programme or the number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities.

Table 7a. Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Number Reference number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 1 HESA T1b T16a_04 Other statistic - State School Progression to employment or further study (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from state schools to 95.4% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 95.4% 94.5% 95% 95.4% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally please give details in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation next column) Maintain completion levels of target groups to at current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 2 HESA T1b - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2) (Young, fullrates No 2013-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from Low Participation Neighbourhoods to 15.514 89% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 15.589% 14.590% 1591% 15.592% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 3 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To half the difference between the non- continuation rate for young full-time first degree entrants from LPNs and that for those from other neighbourhoods No 2009/10 3.592% 2.5% 2% 1.75% Non-continuation rate for those from LPNs in 2009/10 was 12.8% compared with 9.3% for other neibourhoods, resulting in the current 3.5% difference . 4 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To improve the retention statistics for LPN students by 3% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 12.8% 11% 10.3% 9.8% 5 T16a_05 Other statistic - Other (please give details in the next column) Improve employability Maintain mature student % No 2012-13 60% 61% 62% 62% 62% 62% T16a_06 Other statistic - Other (DHLE please give details in the next column) Increase % of part time HE students No 2012-13 37% 40% 41% 42% 43% 43% T16a_07 Other statistic - Other (please give details in the next column) Increase progression from FE to HE No 2014-15 30% 35% 40% 41% 41% 41% T16a_08 Other statistic - Low-income backgrounds (please give details in the next column) LCoM only – employment and further study, all those responding) increase % of those Saturday Music School students from social group 5, 6 & 7 (or family incomes below £25,000 pa) by reducing the gap to those from social groups 1, 2 & 3 from 7% (for 2008/9 graduates - published 2009/10) to 5% for the cohort of FT UG students entering in 2012. low-income backgrounds No 2009/10 7% 6% 5.5% 5% 2014-15 0.2 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around outreach and student success work (including collaborative work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access, student success and progression. These should be measurable outcomes ‐based targets and should focus on the number of beneficiaries reached by a particular activity/programme or the number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities.

Table 7a. Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Number Reference number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 1 T16a_09 HESA T1b - State School (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from state schools to 95.4% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 95.4% 94.5% 95% 95.4% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 2 HESA T1b T2b - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2POLAR3) (YoungAll, fullpart-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels Increase the number of participation for young fullpart-time undergraduates from Low Participation Neighbourhoods undergraduate entrants to 15.5% by 2016/17 1830 No 2009/10 15.5% 14.5% 15% 15.5% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 3 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full2013-time, first degree entrants) To half the difference between the non- continuation rate for young full14 1665 1700 1730 1760 1800 1830 13-time first degree entrants from LPNs and that for those from other neighbourhoods No 2009/10 3.5% 2.5% 2% 1.75% Non-continuation rate for those from LPNs in 2009/10 14 number was 12.8% compared with 9.3% for other neibourhoods, resulting in the current 3.5% difference . 4 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To improve the retention statistics for LPN students by 3% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 12.8% 11% 10.3% 9.8% 5 1665 T16a_10 Other statistic - Other (please give details in the next column) Improve employability Increase % of first degree 1st and 2:1s to UK average No Other (DHLE – employment please give details in Description column) 49.3 56 58 58 58 58 09-10 UK average was 58.1% T16a_11 Other statistic - Other (please give details in the next column) Maintain DLHE employed or further study above benchmark and further studyimprove to UK average No Other (please give details in Description column) 87.8 90 91 91 91 91 08-09 benchmark was 87.3%, UK average 89.9% T16a_12 HESA T7 - Students in receipt of DSA (full-time, all those respondingundergraduate entrants) Reach then exceed benchmark for % of those from social group 5, 6 & 7 'all students' in receipt of DSA No Other (or family incomes below £25,000 paplease give details in Description column) by reducing the gap to those from social groups 1, 2 & 3 from 7% (for 2008/9 graduates - published 2009/10) to 5% for the cohort of FT UG students entering in 2012. No 2009/10 74% 6% 5.56.5% 57% 7% 7% 2010-11 benchmark was 6.4%, England avrage was 5.4% T16a_13 Other statistic - Ethnicity (please give details in the next column) Increase the % of BME graduates achieving 1st or 2:1s No Other (please give details in Description column) 37% 47% 50% 52% 52% 52% Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around outreach and student success work (including collaborative work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access, student success and progression. These should be measurable outcomes ‐based targets and should focus on the number of beneficiaries reached by a particular activity/programme or the number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities.

Table 7a. Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Number Reference number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 1 HESA T1b - State School (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from state schools to 95.4% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 95.4% 94.5% 95% 95.4% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 2 T16a_01 HESA T1b - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2POLAR3) (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels To achieve a participation rate of participation for young full-Young Full time undergraduates Undergraduates (HESA Table T1b) of 17.5% from Low Lower Participation Neighbourhoods to 15.5(POLAR 3), by 2020. No 2013-14 16.4% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 15.516.7% 14.516.9% 1517.1% 15.517.3% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 3 17.5% T16a_02 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 23) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To half reduce the difference between the non- non-continuation rate for young full-time first degree entrants FT UGs from LPNs and that for those from other neighbourhoods to 7.5% by 2020 (as measured by HESA Table T3b – POLAR 3 data) No 2009/10 3.52012-13 8.7% 2.58.3% 28.1% 1.757.9% Non-continuation rate for those from LPNs in 2009/10 was 12.87.7% compared with 9.37.5% for other neibourhoods, resulting T16a_03 Other statistic - Progression to employment or further study (please give details in the current 3.5% difference . 4 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2next column) (Young, To increase the percentage of full-time, UK, first degree entrantsgraduates from LPN (POLAR 3 quintiles 1 or 2) To improve the retention statistics for LPN students by 3entering professional/managerial employment or further study to 68% by 2016/17 2020. No 2009/10 12.82013-14 56% 1160% 10.362% 9.864% 5 66% 68% Based on institutional analysis of DLHE data (the year relates to the year of the survey, the year after graduation) T16a_04 Other statistic - Other (please give details in the next column) Improve employability To increase positive response in the National Student Survey to the statement ‘As a result of my course I believe my career prospects have improved’ to 78% in 2020 (DHLE – employment and further studyfrom 68% in 2013) No 2013-14 68% 70% 72% 74% 76% 78% T16a_05 Other statistic - Care-leavers (please give details in the next column) To increase the number of Care Leavers at MMU to 75 by 2020, all those respondingfrom 57 in 2013/14 (based on number of students receiving the MMU Care Leaver Bursary) No 2013-14 57 60 63 66 70 75 T16a_06 Other statistic - Low-income backgrounds (please give details in the next column) Increase the numbers of those students from social group 5, 6 & 7 low income backgrounds (or family incomes below household income of £25,000 paor less) by reducing the gap to those from social groups 1, 2 & 3 from 7% (for 2008/9 graduates - published 2009/10) to 5% for the cohort of FT UG students entering in 2012. taking a sandwich year No 2009/10 7% 6% 5.5% 5% 2013-14 155 Monitor and publish figure Monitor and publish figure Monitor and publish figure Monitor and publish figure Monitor and publish figure Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around outreach and student success work (including collaborative work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access, student success and progression. These should be measurable outcomes ‐based targets and should focus on the number of beneficiaries reached by a particular activity/programme or the number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities.

Table 7a. Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Number Reference number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 1 T16a_01 HESA T1b - State School NS-SEC classes 4-7 (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels Increase proportion of participation for young fullstudents from NS-time undergraduates SEC classes 4-7 from state schools 18.9% to 95.423% by in 2016/17 No 2009/10 95.42013-14 76.1 22% 94.523% 9523% 95.423% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 2 23% T16a_02 HESA T1b - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2POLAR3) (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels Increase proportion of participation for young fullstudents from POLAR 3 low participating neighbourhoods, from 4.9% to 8% No 2013-time undergraduates from Low Participation Neighbourhoods to 15.514 5.2 7% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 15.58% 14.58% 158% 15.58% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 3 T16a_03 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To half the difference between the non- continuation rate for Ensure % of young full-time first degree entrants from LPNs and that for those from other low participation neighbourhoods no longer in HE remains below 3% No 2009/10 3.5% 2.52012-13 1.9 2% 2% 1.752% Non-continuation rate for those from LPNs in 2009/10 was 12.82% compared with 9.32% for other neibourhoods, resulting in the current 3.5% difference . 4 T16a_04 HESA T3b T1b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) State School (Young, full-time, first degree undergraduate entrants) To improve the retention statistics for LPN students by 3Increase % by 2016/17 of full-time undergraduate entrants from state schools to 80% No 2009/10 12.82013-14 76.1 78.5% 1180% 10.380% 9.880% 5 Other statistic - Other (please give details in the next column) Improve employability (DHLE – employment and further study, all those responding) of those from social group 5, 6 & 7 (or family incomes below £25,000 pa) by reducing the gap to those from social groups 1, 2 & 3 from 7% (for 2008/9 graduates - published 2009/10) to 5% for the cohort of FT UG students entering in 2012. No 2009/10 7% 6% 5.5% 580% Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around outreach and student success work (including collaborative work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access, student success and progression. These should be measurable outcomes ‐based targets and should focus on the number of beneficiaries reached by a particular activity/programme or the number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities.

Table 7a. Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Number Reference number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 1 2019-20 T16a_01 HESA T1b - State School (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from state schools to 95.4% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 95.4% 94.5% 95% 95.4% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 2 HESA T1b T1a - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2) (Young, full-time, undergraduate entrants) Restore 2009/10 levels of participation for young full-time undergraduates from Low Participation Neighbourhoods to 15.5% by 2016/17 No 2009/10 15.5% 14.5% 15% 15.5% In the 2012/13 agreement MMU anticipated that participation would drop nationally in the first two years following the introduction of tuition fees and made a commitment to arresting that fall and restoring participation levels of target groups to current levels over the next five years. Early indications suggest this may be a very ambitious target and once the actual figures are available we will review this position and may alter our targets accordingly. 3 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2POLAR3) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To half increase the difference between the non- continuation rate for proportion of young LPN students from this group to 5.4% by 2019/20 No 2013-14 4% 4% 4% 4.5% 4.9% 5.4% T16a_02 HESA T2a - (Mature, full-time time, first degree entrants entrants) To increase the proportion of mature LPN students from LPNs and that for those from other neighbourhoods this group to 4% by 2019/20 No 2009/10 3.52013-14 2.2% 2.2% 2.5% 23% 1.75% Non-continuation rate for those from LPNs in 2009/10 was 12.8% compared with 9.3% for other neibourhoods, resulting in the current 3.5% difference . 4 4% T16a_03 HESA T3b T7 - Students in receipt of DSA (full-time, first degree entrants) To increase the proportion of this group to 7% by 2019/20 No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) 2013-14 6.3% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7% 6.9% 7% T16a_04 HESA T1a - NS-SEC classes 4-7 (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To improve maintain the retention statistics for LPN proportion of students from this group by 32019/20 No 2013-14 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% T16a_05 HESA T1a - State School (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To maintain the proportion of students from this group by 2016/17 2019/20 No 2009/10 12.82013-14 82% 1182% 10.382% 9.882% 5 Other statistic 82% 82% T16a_06 HESA T3a - Other No longer in HE after 1 year (please give details in Young, full-time, first degree entrants) To reduce the next column) Improve employability (DHLE – employment and further study, all those responding) non-continuation rate of those from social group 5, 6 & 7 (or family incomes below £25,000 pa) by reducing the gap to those from social groups 1, 2 & 3 from 7% (for 2008/9 graduates - published 2009/10) young students to 5% for the cohort of FT UG students entering in by 2019/20 No 2012. No 2009/10 7-13 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 6% 5.5% 5% T16a_07 HESA T3a - No longer in HE after 1 year (Mature, full-time, first degree entrants) To reduce the non-continuation rate of mature students to 15% by 2019/20 No 2012-13 20.6% 20.6% 20.6% 18% 16% 15% T16a_08 HESA T3a - No longer in HE after 1 year (All, full-time, first degree entrants) To reduce the non-continuation rate of the overall population to 7% by 2019/20 No 2012-13 9.7% 9.7% 9.7% 9% 8% 7% Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around outreach and student success work (including collaborative work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access, student success and progression. These should be measurable outcomes ‐based targets and should focus on the number of beneficiaries reached by a particular activity/programme or the number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities.