Technology Review Sample Clauses
A Technology Review clause establishes a process for one party to evaluate and approve the use, integration, or modification of technology within a project or agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria, timelines, and procedures for submitting technology for review, and may specify the types of technology subject to review, such as software, hardware, or proprietary systems. Its core function is to ensure that all technological components meet agreed standards and requirements, thereby reducing the risk of incompatibility, security vulnerabilities, or project delays.
Technology Review. Within three months of the completion of the 2006 Technology Review referenced in Section V.A. of the SCGSE MOU, LAWA shall meet with the Coalition Representative for the purpose of reaching a mutually acceptable agreement on diesel emission reduction strategies for cargo loaders, Ground Power Units, air starts, and cargo tractors operated by Nonparticipating GSE Operators.
Technology Review. The Client may, at its own expense, conduct a review of technology standards each year, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ will provide reasonable co-operation to the Client in the conduct of that review. Any resulting changes required will be completed at ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ discretion.
Technology Review. Available Upon Request per individual quote (billed separately).
Technology Review. Methode shall be satisfied in its reasonable discretion that all Technology used by TST is adequately protected by Intellectual Property rights owned exclusively by TST.
Technology Review. On a continual basis Supervisory Staff will review available technology relating to winter control activities. This may consist of de-icing material, equipment, techniques, weather forecasting, and record keeping capabilities. Staff will make budget recommendations for suitable technological upgrades. Continue to review available technology. Staff recommends suitable technology for budget purposes.
Technology Review. TECHNOLOGY REVIEW
Technology Review. 7.1. [*] Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed (a) to prohibit Data Critical from developing and marketing any such enhanced or new products or (b) to grant Agilent any rights thereto hereunder.
7.2. Data Critical will provide Agilent with [*] days written notice of any proposed upgrades, patches or fixes to the Integrated StatView Product and obtain Agilent's consent prior to making any such upgrades, changes or fixes directly affecting the Integrated StatView Product (unless either required by law or required to be made pursuant to the terms hereof). Nothing in this provision shall be interpreted to prevent or delay a Party from implementing mandatory safety or other recalls or from making or implementing any upgrades, patches or fixes to any product for use by any other party other than by Agilent with respect to any StatView product.
7.3. Agilent shall give Data Critical at least [*] days' prior written notice of any required changes to the Integrated StatView Product resulting from any modification by Agilent to their Bedside System technology or operations. Any such revisions or modifications to the Integrated StatView Product or the interface to Agilent's monitoring systems by Data Critical shall be [*], shall remain the sole property of Data Critical and shall not, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties on mutually agreeable terms (which may be set forth as an amendment hereto), constitute part of the Integrated StatView Product licensed hereunder. [*]
Technology Review. The purpose of the technology review is to understand how exactly existing technologies have been formulated so that their strengths and limitations can be determined in anticipation of delivering a robust, harmonized model. For this a clear understanding of the vocabulary is needed, which in turn facilitates comparison of the existing technologies and hence the formulation of a harmonized model. The solution to the electronic representation of engineering materials data that this document proposes builds on prior work by ASTM E49, ISO TC 184/SC 4, NIST, and the JRC. It also takes into consideration complementary activities undertaken by CETIM (in the context of the Auto-gration project), the Kno.e.sis Center at ▇▇▇▇▇▇ State University (in the context of the US MGI), and the CODATA/VAMAS Working Group on Nanomaterials12. Over the last three decades, a number of international efforts have investigated how to provide a viable electronic representation to describe engineering materials, suitable for database schema and electronic data exchange. The present work builds upon some of these efforts, which are describe briefly below, to take advantage of existing insights and knowledge for our solution. The complexity of modern materials is immense and contributes to the challenge of developing a successful solution. The earlier efforts often did not address some of this complexity, which is a major reason to develop a new solution.