Territory Disputes Among Members Sample Clauses

Territory Disputes Among Members. Each Member Agency agrees that it will negotiate in good faith with respect to any claims or disputes with other Member Agencies concerning their respective retail service territories and any other water utility operations matters. No Member Agency shall commence any legal action against any other Member Agency to resolve any such claim or dispute unless it has first conducted mediation of such claim or dispute with a neutral mediator selected by the Executive Director for a period of not less than thirty (30) days. The parties to any such mediation shall be deemed to have agreed to the tolling of any applicable statute of limitations during the pendency of any mediation under this provision.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Territory Disputes Among Members

  • DISPUTES OF MEMBERS Disputes among Members will be decided by a majority vote. A Member has votes according to that Member’s percent of ownership interest (e.g., 11% ownership equals 11 votes). A majority vote is necessary for an action to take place. Any vote under this Section may occur, provided a quorum of the membership interests is present for the vote. In the event of a split vote among the Members, the Chief Executive Member shall cast a vote to break the tie. Members are required to vote on at least one (1) resolution that attempts to address and resolve the dispute between the Members prior to any Member bringing a direct action under Section 00-00-000 of the Act. Subject to Section 00-00-000 of the Act, Members may maintain a derivative action to enforce a right of the Company, provided the acting Member properly demands the other Member(s) to enforce the right of the Company, or the acting Member adequately declares with particularity that such demands are futile.

  • Settlement of Disputes between Contracting Parties (1) Disputes between Contracting Parties regarding the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Agreement shall be settled through official channels.

  • Settlement of Disputes between an Investor and a Contracting Party (1) Any dispute between an investor of one Contracting Party and the other Contracting Party in relation to an investment of the former under this Agreement shall, as far as possible, be settled amicably through negotiations between the parties to the dispute.

  • Settlement of Disputes between the Contracting Parties 1. Disputes between the Contracting Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement should, if possible, be settled through diplomatic channels.

  • Disputes between an Investor and a Contracting Party (1) Any dispute concerning an investment between an investor of one Contracting Party and the other Contracting Party shall, if possible, be settled amicably.

  • Settlement of Disputes between an Investor and a Contracting Party

  • Disputes between a Contracting Party and an Investor of the other Contracting Party

  • Disputes Concerning Membership -23 Any dispute arising as to an employee’s membership or service charge shall be reviewed by the designated representative of the Employer and a representative of the local Union, and if not resolved, may be submitted to Step III of the Grievance Procedure. However, the employee may be retained at work while the dispute is being resolved.

  • Settlement of Disputes between the Parties 1. Any dispute between the Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Chapter shall, as far as possible, be settled with consultation through diplomatic channel. 2. If a dispute cannot thus be settled within 6 months, it shall, upon the request of either Party, be submitted to an ad hoc arbitral tribunal. 3. Such tribunal comprises of 3 arbitrators. Within 2 months of the receipt of the written notice requesting arbitration, each Party shall appoint one arbitrator. Those 2 arbitrators shall, within further 2 months, together select a national of a third State having diplomatic relations with both Parties who, upon approval by the Parties, shall be appointed as Chairman of the arbitral tribunal. 4. If the arbitral tribunal has not been constituted within 4 months from the receipt of the written notice requesting arbitration, either Party may, in the absence of any other agreement, invite the President of the International Court of Justice to make any necessary appointments. If the President is a national of either Party or is otherwise prevented from discharging the said functions, the Member of the International Court of Justice next in seniority who is not a national of either Party or is not otherwise prevented from discharging the said functions shall be invited to make such necessary appointments. 5. The arbitral tribunal shall determine its own procedure. The arbitral tribunal shall reach its award in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the principles of international law recognized by both Parties. 6. The arbitral tribunal shall reach its award by a majority of votes. Such award shall be final and binding upon both Parties. The arbitral tribunal shall, upon the request of either Party, explain the reasons of its award. 7. Each Party shall bear the costs of its appointed arbitrator and of its representation in arbitral proceedings. The relevant costs of the Chairman and tribunal shall be borne in equal parts by the Parties.

  • Disputes between Contracting Parties (1) Disputes between Contracting Parties regarding the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Agreement shall be settled through diplomatic channels.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.