Traffic Congestion Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Traffic Congestion. The Policy and Partnership Service (PPS), has clearly represented to GOL that these are key local issues that have emerged through our extensive LAA negotiation process and that Harrow hopes that GOL will work hard with Harrow to agree these stretched targets as soon as possible. The volunteering target was earlier agreed with GOL, but on 8 February 2005, Harrow was notified that they target did not offer enough value for money – from GOL’s perspective, one of the key components for sign off on the target. GOL have indicated that there is potential to still negotiate the Volunteering target before June 2006. GOL expects to be able to negotiate community cohesion and traffic congestion potentially before June, but more likely within the first year of the agreement. PPS has expressed to GOL Harrow's extreme disappointment at the late notification of GOL's concern with the volunteering target that Harrow had believed we had been agreed. Central Government has made clear the importance of involving the VCS in the development and delivery of LAA's. The HSPs commitment to closely involving the VCS in the LAA has been clearly evident throughout the process. PPS hopes to be able to work constructively with central Government over the next few weeks to see the volunteering stretched target signed off before April 2006. PPS has urged GOL to keep perusing the Home Office to secure the highest possible value for money calculation for volunteers. Harrow will receive payment for the relative proportion of the total pump-priming grant that equates to the total amount of stretched targets agreed before 1 April 2006 (eg if 75% of the 12 Stretched targets are agreed, 75% of the total pump priming grant will be paid). This will apply to all stretched targets agreed before 1 April 2006. The total maximum pump priming grant available is £961,900.00, and is due for payment by 30 April 2006.
Traffic Congestion. Prior to receiving a partial Certificate of Compliance for the Residential Development, WLP will apply $155,012 in traffic mitigation credits toward the fair- share mitigation payment and will pay the balance of the fair-share mitigation payment ($130,410) to address the congestion mitigation requirements of the RPP.
Traffic Congestion. The contractor shall, upon approval of the engineer, take proactive measures to reduce traffic congestion in the work zone. The contractor shall immediately implement appropriate mitigation strategies whenever traffic congestion reaches an excess of 10 minutes to prevent congestion from escalating to 15 minute or above threshold. If disruption of the traffic flow occurs and traffic is backed up in queues of 15 minute delays or longer, then the contractor shall immediately review the construction operations which contributed directly to disruption of the traffic flow and make adjustments to the operations to prevent the queues from reoccurring. Traffic delays may be monitored by physical presence on site or by utilizing real- time travel data through the work zone that generate text and/or email notifications where available. The engineer monitoring the work zone may also notify the contractor of delays that require prompt mitigation. The contractor may work with the engineer to determine what other alternative solutions or time periods would be acceptable.
Traffic Congestion. Besides cars being backed up along north/south routes, school buses transporting students to nearby educational facilities will also get backed up. Also, emergency vehicles within the area would have a reduced response time getting across University Avenue due to the frequency of LRT travel times. As a mitigation alternative, synchronize traffic lights to prevent excessive back up. Ensure the early creation of a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) to help design ways of overcoming these adverse affects. Recruit those from the impacted EJ community to serve on the CAC.
Traffic Congestion. Prior to receiving a partial Certificate of Compliance for the Residential Development, WLP will apply $155,012 in traffic mitigation credits toward the fair share mitigation payment and will pay the balance of the fair-share mitigation payment ($130,410) to address the congestion mitigation requirements of the RPP. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Campus DA (CCC No. 20065) - DRAFT Development Agreement 22 of 28 T7. If the currently contemplated extension of the Cape Cod Rail Trail must be placed on a certain portion of the Project site situated along ▇▇▇▇'▇ ▇▇▇▇ Road, which extension includes the Trail itself, any vegetative screening, and/or retaining wall, WLP will work with the Town of Barnstable to convey an easement to the Town for such use. Said easement will be on terms mutually acceptable to WLP and the Town and located approximately in the area depicted on Exhibit 10, attached.
Traffic Congestion. The Policy and Partnership Service PPS, has clearly represented to GOL that these are key local issues that have emerged through our extensive LAA negotiation process and that Harrow hopes that GOL will work hard with Harrow to agree these stretched targets as soon as possible.
Traffic Congestion. The contractor shall, upon approval of the engineer, take proactive measures to reduce traffic congestion in the work zone.
Traffic Congestion. GOL have indicated that there is potential to still negotiate the volunteering target before June 2006. GOL expects to be able to negotiate community cohesion and traffic congestion within the first year of the agreement.