Unreliable failure detectors Sample Clauses

Unreliable failure detectors. The failure detector concept was introduced by Xxxxxxx and Xxxxx in [15] with the purpose of identifying the minimal extensions to an asynchronous system that would render consensus solvable. In [15], the authors identify two completeness properties and four accuracy properties. This classification leads to eight classes of failure detectors, which can be reduced to just four distinct classes, by applying reduction algorithms. In the following, we provide some basic definitions for the two completeness and four ac- curacy properties. The weak completeness property requires that there is a time after which ev- ery process that crashes is permanently suspected by some correct process. If we strengthen the constraint and we require that eventually every crashed process is permanently sus- pected by every correct process, we obtain the so-called strong completeness property. The perpetual accuracy property requires that accuracy is always satisfied. Eventual accu- racy relaxes this constraint: accuracy must be permanently satisfied only after some time. Strong accuracy states that no process is suspected before it crashes. The less constraint-full version of strong accuracy is weak accuracy: some correct process is never suspected. Among the classes of failure detectors, we particularly focus on three of them, which are relevant for our work, namely Eventually Weak, denoted by ♢W, Perfect, denoted by P, and Eventually Strong, denoted by ♢S. The Eventually Weak class of failure detectors is described in [15] as the weakest class that renders consensus solvable. A failure detector is in ♢W if it satisfies weak completeness and eventual weak accuracy. These two properties require that eventually some conditions are satisfied and hold forever. However, in a real system in which properties cannot be satisfied forever, it is required that they hold for a sufficiently long period of time. If we refer to the consensus problem, we can quantify the “sufficiently long” period of time as being long enough to allow the algorithm to terminate and each process to decide. The Perfect class, denoted by P, contains the failure detectors that satisfy the most constraint-full requirements, which are strong completeness and strong accuracy. Another important class of failure detectors, intensively investigated in the literature, is the class of Eventually Strong failure detectors, denoted by ♢S. A failure detector belonging to this class satisfies the properties of strong complete...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Unreliable failure detectors

  • Smoke Detectors At Owner's expense, smoke detectors will be installed on the Property in working condition in accordance with the law prior to the tenant's occupancy. During the occupancy, it shall be the tenant's responsibility to maintain all smoke detectors. Owner will replace smoke detector equipment as needed.

  • Smoke Detector Tenant acknowledges that Premises is equipped with a smoke detector(s) that is in good working order and repair. Tenant agrees to be solely responsible to check the smoke detector every thirty (30) days and notify Landlord immediately if the smoke detector is not functioning properly.

  • Intrusion Detection All systems involved in accessing, holding, transporting, and protecting PHI COUNTY discloses to CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY that are accessible via the Internet must be protected by a comprehensive intrusion detection and prevention solution.

  • Detective An Employee specifically assigned by the Employer to the job position of rotating or non-rotating detective.

  • Outages 9.7.1.1 Outage Authority and Coordination. Interconnection Customer and Transmission Owner may each in accordance with Good Utility Practice in coordination with the other Party and Transmission Provider remove from service any of its respective Interconnection Facilities, System Protection Facilities, Network Upgrades, System Protection Facilities or Distribution Upgrades that may impact the other Party’s facilities as necessary to perform maintenance or testing or to install or replace equipment. Absent an Emergency Condition, the Party scheduling a removal of such facility(ies) from service will use Reasonable Efforts to notify one another and schedule such removal on a date and time mutually acceptable to the Parties. In all circumstances, any Party planning to remove such facility(ies) from service shall use Reasonable Efforts to minimize the effect on the other Parties of such removal.

  • Downtime Due to the nature of server provision, downtime and lost transmissions may occur as part of routine maintenance. You are advised to maintain a copy of your account status and details of Content purchased.

  • Tuberculosis Examination The examination shall consist of an approved intradermal tuberculosis test, which, if positive, shall be followed by an X-ray of the lungs. Nothing in Sections 5163 to 5163.2, inclusive, shall prevent the governing body of any city or county, upon recommendation of the local health officer, from establishing a rule requiring a more extensive or more frequent examination than required by Section 5163 and this section. § 5163.2. Technician taking X-ray film; Interpretation of X-ray The X-ray film may be taken by a competent and qualified X-ray technician if the X-ray film is subsequently interpreted by a licensed physician and surgeon.

  • Virus detection You will be responsible for the installation and proper use of any virus detection/scanning program we require from time to time.

  • Calibration The comparison of a measurement system or device of unverified accuracy with a measurement system of known and greater accuracy to detect deviation of the unverified measurement system from required performance specifications (of the unverified measurement system or device) and to quantify all measured values to applicable units of the international system of units.

  • Network Congestion Reduced Speed for Routing or Answering 911 Dialing Calls. There may be a greater possibility of network congestion and/or reduced speed in the routing of a 911 Dialing call made utilizing the Service as compared to traditional 911 dialing over traditional public telephone networks.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.