Common use of Vacation Ownership Properties at Third-Party Owned Starwood Lodging Facilities Clause in Contracts

Vacation Ownership Properties at Third-Party Owned Starwood Lodging Facilities. A. If a third-party developer of a Starwood Lodging Facility desires to have a Vacation Ownership Property as a component of or adjacent to such Starwood Lodging Facility project (the “Co-Located Starwood Lodging Facility”), and Starwood reasonably determines that there may be an opportunity for Vistana to participate in the relevant project, Starwood will attempt to secure an introduction on Vistana’s behalf with the third-party developer, but shall have no obligation to attempt to persuade such developer to pursue the opportunity with Vistana. B. For the avoidance of doubt and subject to the exclusivity provisions in Section 2.2A(i) and (ii), nothing in this Section 5.7 shall restrict Starwood (or the relevant developer) from proceeding with such Vacation Ownership Property without Vistana’s involvement nor restrict Starwood (or developer) from engaging in any activities to the extent not prohibited under this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the following activities shall not be deemed to be prohibited under this Agreement: (i) the marketing, offering, and selling of units in such Vacation Ownership Property at the Co-Located Starwood Lodging Facility to any Person, including guests of the Co-Located Starwood Lodging Facility, whether or not such guest is a member of any Brand Loyalty Program; provided that, during the term of the Noncompetition Agreement, such Vacation Ownership Property is not affiliated with a Vacation Ownership Competitor, (ii) the provision of operational services to such Vacation Ownership Property; provided that such services are also being provided to the Co-Located Starwood Lodging Facility, (iii) the placing of overflow guests of the Co-Located Starwood Lodging Facility in such Vacation Ownership Property on a transient basis, and (iv) the offering of potential customers of such Vacation Ownership Property stays at the Co-Located Starwood Lodging Facility in connection with the marketing and sale of the units of such adjacent Vacation Ownership Property; provided that Starwood will take reasonable steps to provide for appropriate brand separation sufficient to avoid customer confusion, if necessary. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event Starwood proceeds, without Vistana’s involvement, with such Vacation Ownership Property, Starwood will not, except with respect to Ancillary Amenities related to such Vacation Ownership Property, license the developer to use the “Sheraton” or “Westin” brands in connection with such Vacation Ownership Property. C. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement: (i) any Vacation Ownership Properties that are a component of or adjacent to or integrated with Starwood Lodging Facilities, and any and all shared services, marketing, sales and other activities conducted in connection therewith as of the Effective Date, are hereby permitted (and prior to the Effective Date, Starwood has provided Vistana with a list of “Sheraton”-branded and “Westin”-branded Starwood Lodging Facilities, which, to the knowledge of Starwood’s regional vice-presidents, are adjacent to or integrated with any Vacation Ownership Property that has shared facilities with or receives services from the relevant Starwood Lodging Facility or where sales and marketing for such Vacation Ownership Property is conducted in the relevant Starwood Lodging Facility); provided that the parties agree to use commercially reasonable efforts (taking into account Starwood’s relationship with the applicable owner, developer, operator, or franchisee of the relevant Starwood Lodging Facility) to cooperate in order to reduce the impact to the Licensed Business to the extent Vistana reasonably demonstrates that the sales and marketing activities conducted pursuant to this Section 5.7C at any “Sheraton”-branded or “Westin”-branded Starwood Lodging Facility adjacent to or integrated with a Vacation Ownership Property would reasonably have an adverse effect on the Licensed Business; provided, however, that any such efforts to cooperate shall not apply with respect to any activities permitted under any contract or agreement in place as of the Effective Date; and (ii) any Vacation Ownership Properties that are acquired by Starwood pursuant to Section 2.4 of the Noncompetition Agreement, or acquired by Starwood after the expiry of the Noncompetition Agreement, and any and all activities conducted in connection therewith as of the date of acquisition thereof, are hereby permitted.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: License, Services and Development Agreement (Starwood Hotel & Resorts Worldwide, Inc), Separation Agreement (Starwood Hotel & Resorts Worldwide, Inc), License, Services and Development Agreement (Vistana Signature Experiences, Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!