Common use of Validity Challenge Clause in Contracts

Validity Challenge. 13.6.1 In the event that a Third Party commences any re-examination, interference, opposition or nullity proceeding or challenges the validity or enforceability of, or opposes any extension of or the grant of a patent term extension request or a SPC with respect to, any Vitae Patent, BI Patent or Joint Patent (each such action a “Patent Challenge”) during the Term in any country of the Territory, then the Parties shall jointly take such legal action as is required to defend the validity of such particular Vitae Patents, BI Patents, or Joint Patents through patent litigation counsel jointly selected by the Parties. Each Party shall give all reasonable assistance (excluding financial assistance) to the other Party. Each Party may also be represented by counsel of its own selection at its own expense in any such legal action. Any settlement shall be subject to the Parties’ mutual agreement, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. BI shall be solely responsible for all costs in connection with such Patent Challenge. 13.6.2 For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 13.6 shall not apply to the defense of any Patent Challenge that is raised as a counter-claim or defense by a Third Party that is the subject of an infringement action pursuant to Section 13.3 above, in which case the defense of such Patent Challenge will be governed by such Section 13.3.

Appears in 5 contracts

Samples: Research Collaboration and License Agreement (Vitae Pharmaceuticals, Inc), Research Collaboration and License Agreement (Vitae Pharmaceuticals, Inc), Research Collaboration and License Agreement (Vitae Pharmaceuticals, Inc)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!