Xxxxxx and X Xxxxxxxxx. Key-agreement in ad-hoc networks. In Nordsec’99, 1999. [4] X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxx. Authenticated Group Key Agreement and Friends. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 17–26. ACM, November 1998. [5] X. Xxxxxx and X. Xxxxx. Communication complexity of group key distribution. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, November 1998. [6] X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In 1st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1993. [7] Xxx Xxxxx. The Decision Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx problem. In Third Algorithmic Number Theory Symposium, number 1423 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 48–63. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1998. [8] Xxx Xxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Applications of multilinear forms to cryptography. To appear in Contemporary Mathematics, American Mathematical Society. [9] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx key exchange — the dynamic case. In Xxxxx Xxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT ’2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Gold Coast, Australia, 2001. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany. [10] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, and Xxxx-Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group xxxxxx-xxxxxxx key exchange. In Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, editor, 8th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Philadelphia, PA, USA, November 2001. ACM Press. [11] Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx and Xxx Xxxxxxx. A secure and efficient conference key distribution system. In X. Xx Xxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’94, number 950 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1995. final version of proceedings. [12] X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxxx, X. Xxx, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxx. The VersaKey framework: Versatile group key management. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(9), September 1999. [13] Xxxxx Xxxxx. Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures. In X.X. Xxxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’90, number 473 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 458–464. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, May 1991.
Xxxx, Xx Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Attention: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx, CEO Email: Xx.Xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx with a copy to : Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.
Xxxxx X X. Xxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxx and X X. Xxxxx. 1930. Checklist of the fishes and fishlike vertebrates of North and Middle America north of the northern boundary of Venezuela and Columbia. Rept. U.S. Fish Comm. 1928(2):1-670. Jordan, D.S. and X.X. Xxxxxxxx. 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America. Part 1. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bul. 47:1-1240. Xxxxx, S. and X. Xxxxxx. 2005..Hydrogeologic setting of the snake valley hydrologic basin, Xxxxxxx County, Utah, and White Pine and Lincoln Counties, Nevada – implications for possible effects of proposed water xxxxx. Report of investigation 254, Utah Geological Survey. Xxxxxxx, M.C. 1982. Status report of three Bonneville basin endemic fishes. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 27 pp. May, B. E. and X. X. Xxxxx. 1981. Comparative effects of sheep and cattle grazing on the Xxxxx Creek drainage. Transactions of the Bonneville Chapter American Fisheries Society. 1981:48-62. Xxxxx, X.X. 1985. Predation and species replacement in American Southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwestern Naturalist. 30:173-187. Xxxxxx, X. X. and X. X. Xxxxxx. 1985. Two New Intergeneric Cyprinid Hybrids from the Bonneville Basin, Utah. Copeia, 1985(2):509-515. Xxxxxx, X.X. 1972. Threatened freshwater fishes of the United States. Trans. Amer, Fish. Soc. 101(2):239-252.
Xxxxx and X Xxxxxxxxxx. Non-Commutative Geometry, Non- Associative Geometry and the Standard Model of Particle Physics, 1401.5083.
Xxxx, X Xxxx, Chief Corporate Counsel of the Company, shall have furnished to the Representatives a written opinion or opinions, dated the Time of Delivery for such Designated Securities, in form and substance satisfactory to the Representatives, to the effect that:
Xxxxx, Xx Xxxx X. Xxxxx, Xx., Esq., Solicitor Cc: X. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Mayor Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Director of Public Works Xxxx Xxxxxx, ArtsQuest RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
Xxxxxx, X Xxxxxxxx --------------------------- Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx
Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxxxxx “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or Subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.
