Xxxxxxxx, N. V., a company incorporated in The Netherlands (registered number 33250021) whose registered office is at Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 00, 0000 XX Xxxxxxxxx Zuidoost, The Netherlands (the Parent);
Xxxxxxxx, N. V. represents and warrants for the benefit of the others as follows:
Xxxxxxxx, N. R., 2011.
Xxxxxxxx, N. C. App. , S.E.2d (Aug. 1, 2017). (1) The evidence was insufficient to support a conviction under G.S. 14-208.18(a)(1), for being a sex offender on the premises of a daycare. The defendant was seen in a parking lot of a strip mall containing a daycare, other businesses, and a restaurant. Next-door to the daycare was a hair salon; next to the hair salon was a tax business. The three businesses shared a single building as well as a common parking lot. A restaurant in a separate, freestanding building shared the same parking lot. None of the spaces in the parking lot were specifically reserved or marked as intended for the daycare. The daycare, including its playground area, was surrounded by a chain-link fence. The court agreed with the defendant that the State failed to present sufficient evidence that the shared parking lot was part of the premises of the daycare. It stated: “[T]he shared parking lot is located on premises that are not intended primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors. Therefore, we conclude that a parking lot shared with other businesses (especially with no designation(s) that certain spaces “belong” to a particular business) cannot constitute “premises” as set forth in subsection (a)(1) of the statute.” (2) The defendant’s guilty plea to unlawfully being within 300 feet of a daycare must be vacated in light of a Fourth Circuit’s decision holding G.S. 14-208.18(a)(2) to be unconstitutional. The defendant was indicted and pled guilty to violating G.S. 14-208.18(a)(2), which prohibits certain persons from being within 300 feet a location intended primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors. While his direct appeal was pending, the Fourth Circuit held that statute to be unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the First Amendment. Thus the conviction must be vacated.
Xxxxxxxx, N. E. Xxxxxx. (2016) “Comparison Of Monoenergetic Photon Organ Dose Rate Coefficients For Stylized And Voxel Phantoms Submerged In Air,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry 172: 367-374.
Xxxxxxxx, N. J.E.A. convention days, or the school recesses for Thanksgiving, December Recess, Winter Recess, and Spring Recess as presently established shall not be designated as staff development days. No more than two (2) consecutive days may be designated as staff development days.
Xxxxxxxx, N. Clinical pharmacology of nicotine: implications for understanding, preventing, and treating tobacco addiction. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2008. 83(4): p. 531-541.
Xxxxxxxx, N. V. a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands whose principal place of business is in Amsterdam, The Netherlands (the Seller); and
Xxxxxxxx, N. A., et al., No. 09-CV-02079-JW (N.D. Cal.), provided, however, Settled Defense Claims shall not include any claim arising out of the violation, nonperformance, or breach of this Agreement.
Xxxxxxxx, N. A., et al., United States District 10 Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 09-CV02079
