Exhibit 4(g) Amendment renewing the IMMUNITY AGREEMENT entered into January 25, 1994 between Motorola, Inc. and ASE, Incorporated Motorola Inc. and ASE, Incorporated agree to amend the above-identified IMMUNITY AGREEMENT as follows: In Section 1.4,...Immunity Agreement • June 30th, 2004 • Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc • Semiconductors & related devices
MODEL LETTER - CONFIRMATION THAT INDIVIDUAL COVERED UNDER CORPORATE IMMUNITY AGREEMENT]Immunity Agreement • October 10th, 2007
This is to confirm that [X LTD.] has entered into an immunity agreement, (“corporate immunity agreement”), attached as Appendix 1, with the Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada pursuant to the Competition Bureau’s Information Bulletin entitled “Immunity Program Under the Competition Act”, attached as Appendix 2. The corporate immunity agreement covers you as a [SELECT – current, former, director, officer, employee or
Immunity AgreementImmunity Agreement • September 25th, 2003 • Tessera Technologies Inc • Semiconductors & related devices • California
This Agreement (hereafter “Agreement”) is entered into as of the day of January, 2002 (“Effective Date”), between TESSERA INC., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 3099 Orchard Drive, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA and the Tessera Affiliates (“Tessera”) and SHARP CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of Japan having a principal place of business at 22-22 Nagaike-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8522 Japan and the Sharp Affiliates (“Sharp”) with reference to the following facts:
Immunity Agreement Case LawImmunity Agreement • January 31st, 2007
In re Kenneth H., 80 Cal.App.4th 143, 95 Cal.Rptr.2d 5 Cal.App. 3 Dist., 2000. The Court of Appeal, Scotland, J., held that: (1) plea agreement was subject to specific enforcement, and (2) effect of specific enforcement would be to require prosecutor to move for dismissal. Plea agreement, which had not been submitted for court approval, was subject to specific enforcement, where district attorney proposed, and parties agreed, that minor would pay for and take polygraph examination, and would plead guilty to inflicting cruelty upon an animal if he failed examination, but charge would be dropped if he passed; juvenile relied upon agreement to his detriment by giving up his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, paying $350 for private polygraph examination, and taking examination. Prosecutor may withdraw from a plea bargain before a defendant pleads guilty or otherwise detrimentally relies on that bargain; absent detrimental reliance on the bargain, the defendant has an adequa
SECOND AMENDMENT TO IMMUNITY AGREEMENTImmunity Agreement • March 7th, 2008 • Stats Chippac Ltd. • Semiconductors & related devices
Whereas Motorola Inc., (“MOTOROLA”) and ST Assembly Test Services, Ltd. (“STATS”) entered into an Immunity Agreement on October 18, 1996 involving BGA packages (“IMMUNITY AGREEMENT”);
University of Miami Law SchoolImmunity Agreement • October 19th, 2015
AMENDMENT TO IMMUNITY AGREEMENTImmunity Agreement • August 11th, 2004 • Tessera Technologies Inc • Semiconductors & related devices
This Amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into as of this 6th day of July, 2004 (“Amendment Execution Date”) by and between TESSERA, INC. (“Tessera”) and SHARP CORPORATION (“Sharp”), and amends the Immunity Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by and between the parties having an Effective Date of January 24, 2002. Both parties agree that any and all terms and conditions of this Amendment deem to be effective on and after April 1, 2004 (“Amendment Effective Date”).
Immunity Agreement: Re-engineering the Immune Response to Treat Pancreas CancerImmunity Agreement • June 3rd, 2014
Human cell lines in immune- Patient-derived GEMM of GEMM of deficient host (murine cells can be tumor pieces in spontaneous spontaneous
MODEL LETTER - CONFIRMATION THAT INDIVIDUAL COVERED UNDER CORPORATE IMMUNITY AGREEMENT]Immunity Agreement • November 19th, 2014
This is to confirm that [Corporation] has entered into an immunity agreement, ("corporate immunity agreement"), attached as Appendix 1, with the Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada pursuant to the Competition Bureau's Information Bulletin entitled "Immunity Program Under the Competition Act", attached as Appendix 2. The corporate immunity agreement covers you as a [current / former director, officer, employee or agent], subject to your full disclosure and cooperation, as described in the corporate immunity agreement, which governs the terms and conditions of your eligibility for immunity.
University of Miami Law Review Volume 21 Number 4 Article 12Immunity Agreement • September 24th, 2020
Immunity AgreementImmunity Agreement • November 7th, 2003 • Tessera Technologies Inc • Semiconductors & related devices • California
This Agreement (hereafter “Agreement”) is entered into as of the 24 day of January, 2002 (“Effective Date”), between TESSERA INC., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 3099 Orchard Drive, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA and the Tessera Affiliates (“Tessera”) and SHARP CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of Japan having a principal place of business at 22-22 Nagaike-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8522 Japan and the Sharp Affiliates (“Sharp”) with reference to the following facts:
