Examples of Deed of Nomination Rights in a sentence
The Registered Provider shall be required to comply with the Council’s Deed of Nomination Rights in respect of the affordable tenure units.
The Registered Provider shall be required to comply with the Council’s Deed of Nomination Rights in respect of the affordable tenure units;x.
A section 106 Agreement runs with the land whereas a Deed of Nomination Rights would only be binding on those who are party to it.
As it is a private developer and I assume the developer does not yet own the land it would be appropriate to enter into a Section 106 Agreement rather than using a Grampian condition with a requirement for a Deed of Nomination Rights.
Also considering NPPG 21a-010-20140306 it appears that using a Grampian condition “not to occupy any of the dwellings until the Applicant has entered into a Deed of Nomination Rights with the Council” may not meet the test of necessity or be sufficiently transparent, whereas the terms of the S106 Agreement and Deed of Nomination Rights will have been agreed with the developer prior to the grant of planning permission.
There is no significant conflict with Council policies or design guidance that would justify a refusal of the scheme and the recommendation is therefore one of APPROVAL subject to the applicant being willing to enter into a S106 agreement to ensure the disposal of the development to a Registered Provider and a Deed of Nomination Rights between the Council and the Registered Provider.
The amount your Covered Dependent spouse or partner in a civil union, child or Domestic Partner may convert is limited to the lesser of: 1.
Therefore, the Council will seek through the section 106 Agreement, and associated Deed of Nomination Rights, 100% nomination for affordable rented accommodation in the first instance.
They are defined as follows:• Ideal time:The time without interruption where you can concentrate on your work and feel fully productive• Velocity:Measuring the project velocity, you simply count up how many user stories or how many programming tasks were finished during the iteration.
Speaker and hearer may have radically different ontological commitments (Hookway 1988: 134) – that is, they may focus on radically different categories of item in dividing up the world -- so that context cannot be used, as in e.g. Catford (1965), as a measure of translation equivalence.