Examples of MII Policy in a sentence
Procurement with estimated value of less than `200 crore is done through Domestic Tenders except against specific approvals, as per MII Policy PP-MII Order dated 16.09.2020 with subsequent amendments.
It is implicit in Clause 4(i) that if non-payment under the Owners’ Policies (which leads to the claim under the MII Policy) is not made by reason of any of the circumstances specified in Clause 1, then there will not be any claim for an indemnity and there will be no need to carry out the calculation exercise in Clause 4(i).
But, in any event, there was no prima facie cover for the loss under the War Risks Policy for the purposes of Clause 1(i) of the MII Policy, because regardless of the Owners’ non-disclosure and the resulting avoidance of the War Risks Policy, the detention of the Vessel would not have been covered: cover would have been excluded by Rule 3.5.1 and/or 3.5.2 of the Club Rules.
If it were otherwise, then the MII Policy would be providing primary insurance in respect of loss of or damage to the Vessel as it would be providing cover where there would have been no cover under the War Risks Policy due to the exclusion, and yet both the Bank and the Insurers are agreed that the MII Policy provides secondary insurance71.
Pursuant to Clause 1 of the MII Wording, the MII Policy was “ to indemnify the Insured for loss of, or damage to, or liability arising in connection with the Vessel.
Together, Clauses 1(ii) and 4(i)(a) and 4(ii) ensure that the MII Policy functions as a contract of indemnity.
Prior approval is generally not required to assume positions with charitable and other non- profit organizations or civic and trade associations.
The Bank suggests that because the MII Policy is to “ indemnify the Insured for loss of, or damage to, … the vessel … Which occurs by virtue of any alleged deliberate, negligent or accidental act or omission”, Clause 1(ii) looks not at the cause of a lack of cover for a loss which would otherwise be covered under the War Risks Policy, but at the cause of the Vessel’s loss.
On 16 December 2016, it having become apparent from correspondence between Waterson Hicks and NRF (that the writer had obtained) that “ War Risks Underwriters will deny liability for Owners' claim for an actual/constructive total loss”, Hill Dickinson formally presented the Bank’s claim under the MII Policy in respect of the Vessel to the Defendants.
For simplicity we will assume that C has pullbacks.Definition 2.1.9. Let (C, J) be a site where C has pullbacks.