Examples of Mobile Premium Services Determination in a sentence
On 29 June 2005, the Australian Communications Authority (ACA, now ACMA) made the Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2005 No.1 (the Determination) under section 99 of the Telecommunications Act.
In the context of the role of industry, it is also relevant to note the requirements for the development of a self-regulatory scheme pursuant to the Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2005 (No 1) (‘the Determination’).
This Determination is the Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2010 (No. 2).Note This Determination is made in accordance with subregulation 3.12 (1) of the Telecommunications Regulations 2001 and section 4 of the Premium Service Determination 2004 (No. 1).
Notwithstanding this appar- ent success in industry self-regulation, and following a consulta- tion process in the latter part of 2009, the ACMA released in early March The Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination (No. 1) (Determination No. 1).
Conclusion This submission provides the ACMA with the opportunity to enhance the Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2010 (No.2) in protecting consumers.
Title of regulatory proposal Description of regulatory proposal Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2010 (No.1) Prohibits premium SMS and MMS content providers from charging customers for services they did not authorise and requires clear information about the nature and cost of the service.
In the United Kingdom, for example, Islamic insurance is likely to fall within the regulatory net of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), but gives rise to various regulatory issues.
The ACA made the Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination (No. 1) 2005 (the SPD) to establish these rules on 29 June 2005.4 Together with industry codes of practice made by the InternetIndustry Association (IIA), this measure is serving as an interim arrangement, pending the outcome of a review by the Department of Communications, 1 DCITA, Report of the Review of the Operation of Schedule 5 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, DCITA, Canberra, 2004, p.
Administered by: Communications General Comments: The Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2005 (No. 1) is revoked by the Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Revocation Determination 2009.
Telecommunications Service Provider (Mobile Premium Services) Determination 2010 (No.2) Empowers the ACMA to issue a temporary Do Not Bill order to stop suspect content providers from charging customers while it investigates a service.