Examples of Platform Rig in a sentence
This amount represents a non-cash charge of $47.5 million related to the impairment of the Hercules 185 and related unamortized deferred costs; a non-cash charge of $35.2 million related to the impairment of the Hercules 258; a non-cash charge of $25.5 million related to the impairment of the Hercules 252; an $18.4 million gain on the sale of Platform Rig 3 and a $27.3 million gain on the Hercules 185 insurance settlement.
In addition, 2012 includes an $18.4 million gain on the sale of Platform Rig 3, a $27.3 million gain for the Hercules 185 insurance settlement as well as $9.2 million in loss on extinguishment of debt.
This amount represents a non-cash charge of $35.2 million related to the impairment of the Hercules 258; a non-cash charge of $25.5 million related to the impairment of the Hercules 252; an $18.4 million gain on the sale of Platform Rig 3 and a $27.3 million gain on the Hercules 185 insurance settlement.
There are some other types of platforms, such as, Drill Barge, Inland Barge, Platform Rig, Submersible and Tender, and these kinds of platforms are used in some different operations and environments.
In addition, Income (Loss) from Operations for the Company's International Offshore segment includes a gain on the sale of Platform Rig 3 of $18.4 million and a gain on Hercules 185 insurance settlement of $27.3 million (See Notes 6 and 17).
This represents the gain on the sale of Platform Rig 3 and related legal entities.
Example of a Platform Rig: The Mad Dog Spar in Deep Water in the Gulf of MexicoSource: Cndn Bacon at English Wikipedia, Accessed April 7, 2016: http://tinyurl.com/h873o6z (permission granted under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2).Table 1.
Includes $60.7 million in asset impairment charges, an $18.4 million gain on the sale of Platform Rig 3 and a $27.3 million gain on the Hercules 185 insurance settlement (See Notes 6, 12 and 17).
Plaintiffs’ conspiracy count cites 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Civil action for deprivation of rights”) and Subsections (2) and (3) of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (“Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights”).
It is argued that policy should be based essentially on free and unrestricted trade, and if agriculture is not economically viable as a food, fibre and fuel producing industry without support, but provides environmental and other public benefits, it should be paid from the ‘public purse’ only for the public benefits it delivers.