TABLE II. Amortization factors _________ Number of years from attained age Interest Rate __________________ ______________ to Normal Retirement Age 7.50% 8.00% 8.50% _______________ _____ ______ ______ 1 0.5181 0.5192 0.5204 2 0.3577 0.3593 0.3609 3 0.2777 0.2796 0.2184 4 0.2299 0.2139 0.2339 5 0.1982 0.2003 0.2024 6 0.1756 0.1778 0.1801 7 0.1588 0.1611 0.1634 8 0.1458 0.1482 0.1506 9 0.1355 0.1380 0.1405 10 0.1272 0.1297 0.1323 11 0.1203 0.1229 0.1255 12 0.1145 0.1171 0.1198 13 0.1096 0.1123 0.1151 14 0.1054 0.1082 0.1110 15 0.1018 0.1046 0.1075 16 0.0986 0.0988 0.1018 17 0.0958 0.0988 0.1018 18 0.0934 0.0964 0.0994 19 0.0912 0.0943 0.0974 20 0.0893 0.0924 0.0956 21 0.0876 0.0908 0.0940 22 0.0861 0.0893 0.0925 23 0.0847 0.0879 0.0912 24 0.0835 0.0867 0.0901 25 0.0823 0.0857 0.0890 26 0.0813 0.0847 0.0881 27 0.0804 0.0838 0.0872 28 0.0795 0.0830 0.0865 29 0.0788 0.0822 0.0858 30 0.0781 0.0816 0.0851 31 0.0774 0.0810 0.0846 32 0.0768 0.0804 0.0840 33 0.0763 0.0804 0.0836 34 0.0758 0.0794 0.0831 35 0.0753 0.0790 0.0827 36 0.0749 0.0786 0.0824 37 0.0745 0.0783 0.0820 38 0.0742 0.0779 0.0817 39 0.0739 0.0776 0.0815 40 0.0736 0.0774 0.0812 41 0.0733 0.0771 0.0810 42 0.0730 0.0769 0.0808 43 0.0728 0.0767 0.0806 44 0.0726 0.0765 0.0804 45 0.0724 0.0763 0.0802 TABLE III: Factors to be multiplied by those in Table I. ________ Normal Retirement Interest Rate ___________ ______________ Age 7.50% 8.00% 8.50% ____ ______ _____ ______ 80 0.206 0.194 0.184 79 0.231 0.219 0.207 78 0.258 0.246 0.234 77 0.289 0.276 0.263 76 0.322 0.309 0.296 75 0.359 0.346 0.333 74 0.400 0.387 0.374 73 0.446 0.432 0.419 72 0.495 0.482 0.469 71 0.549 0.537 0.525 70 0.609 0.597 0.586 69 0.674 0.664 0.653 68 0.745 0.736 0.728 67 0.822 0.816 0.810 66 0.907 0.904 0.900 65 1.000 1.000 1.000 64 1.101 1.106 1.110 63 1.212 1.221 1.231 62 1.332 1.348 1.363 61 1.464 1.486 1.509 60 1.606 1.637 1.669 59 1.761 1.802 1.844 58 1.929 1.982 2.036 57 2.111 2.177 2.246 56 2.309 2.390 2.475 55 2.523 2.622 2.726 Note: These factors are based on the UP-1984 Mortality Table. TABLE IV: Factors for Participants who are at or beyond Normal _________ Retirement Age. Normal Interest Rate _______ ______________ Retirement Age 7.50% 8.00% 8.50% ___ ______ _____ ______ 80 5.151 5.053 4.959 79 5.370 5.264 5.162 78 5.591 5.476 5.366 77 5.814 5.690 5.572 76 6.039 5.905 5.777 75 6.266 6.122 5.985 74 6.494 6.339 6.192 73 6.721 6.556 6.398 72 6.947 6.771 6.603 71 7.171 7.983 6.804 70 7.392 7.192 7.003 69 7.610 7.399 7.198 68 7.825 7.601 ...
TABLE II. Targeted schedule and timeline for Phase II
TABLE II. PARTIALLY AMORTIZING (BALLOON) LOANS Proportion of Remaining Principal Months Remaining To Maturity/Repricing1 Amount Being Prepaid -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 3 6 9 12 24 36 48 60 84 120 240 360 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 90-100% 0 .26 .49 .71 .94 1.8 2.7 3.4 4.2 5.6 7.4 11.6 14.0 60-89% 0 .30 .59 .86 1.15 2.2 3.3 4.3 5.3 7.1 9.4 15.0 18.1 30-59% 0 .31 .63 .95 1.27 2.6 3.9 5.3 6.6 9.1 12.6 21.2 26.2 0-29% 0 .31 .63 .95 1.27 2.6 4.0 5.4 7.0 10.2 15.7 33.4 46.0
Examples of TABLE II in a sentence
Permit by rule for one-time activities 100 100 TABLE II WASTE MANAGEMENT FEES - ANNUAL LICENSE MAXIMUM FEES IN DOLLARS TITLE 38 SECTION PROCESSING FEE ANNUAL LICENSE FEE 1278, Asbestos abatement A.
For Cargoes With Vapor Densities Ranging Up To And Including 2.0 Loading RatePressure DropPressure Drop3500 bbls/hr.08 psi2.2 inches H2O4000 bbls/hr.1 psi2.8 inches H2O4500 bbls/hr.126 psi3.5 inches H2O5000 bbls/hr.153 psi4.2 inches H2O5500 bbls/hr.186 psi5.2 inches H2O6000 bbls/hr.214 psi6.0 inches H2O7000 bbls/hr.282 psi7.8 inches H2O8000 bbls/hr.366 psi10.1 inches H2O TABLE II.
We first discuss the requirements for communication VM to VM LXC to LXC eth0 IPOPsm same VM diff VMs bandwidth(Mb/s) 938,3 69,70 8442,36 19,63 standard deviation 1,18 4,61 79,61 0,54 TABLE II: Comparison of qperf performance between different virtualized environment.
The labeling defects are listed in table II as follows: TABLE II.
TABLE II: Coordinates of the last coded coefficient in a 4x4 unit, depending on the number of coded coefficients and the scanning mode used.
More Definitions of TABLE II
TABLE II. MEANS AND STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE CRITERION MEASURES OF TOTAL GRADE PbiNT AVERAGE AND VARIANCE, GRADE POINTAVERAGE AND VARIANCE IN MAJOR, AND GRADE POINT AVERAGE AND VARIANCE IN AREA WITH THEGREATEST NUMBER OF HOURS FOR THE COMBINED GROUP GPAGPVMGPAMGPVHGPAHGPV Mean 2 .71 0.61 2.87 0.37 2.75 0.43 Standard D eviation 0 .55 0.35 0.77 0.47 0 .72 0.43
TABLE II. Means, standard deviations, and correlations www.man 1112131415161718192021221 Non-family 2 Family 3 School value 4 Salary 5 Knowledge 6 Education 7 Quality of life 8 Love 9 Access 10 Charity 11 Individualism12 Protean career1.000.420** 1.00 13 Traditional career0.0400.1321.00 14 Gender0.01520.11620.0661.00 15 Age0.0730.1230.04520.1551.00 16 Currentemployment 20.154 0.102 0.019 20.0710.403** 1.00 17 Future career0.0360.08520.0330.0440.0610.1651.00 18 Marital status0.14520.0300.15320.1870.448**0.196*20.0811.00 19 School status0.09620.0470.0120.0120.258*0.17420.0470.2041.00 20 Making mark0.193*0.354**.197*20.09020.10920.0100.276**20.04520.1261.00 21 Be wealthy20.0310.1730.399**20.18320.16820.13820.221*20.03120.1150.338**1.00 22 Thrive change0.293**0.309**0.15120.1430.1370.0080.1750.03820.1130.400**0.277**1.00 Career choice in management
TABLE II. Mean feeding rates (gfood-DW.ganimal-DW-1.day-1), egestion and assimilation rates (% of ingested food) for the different analysed amphipod species. species given food FR (%.day-1) ER (% food) AR (% food) Djerboa furcipes algae 6.2 54 46 Eurymera monticulosa squid algae 3.0 2.4 13 n.d. 87 n.d. Gondogeneia redfearni squid 15.7 10 90 Prostebbingia brevicornis squid 9.5 44 56 Abyssorchomene nodimanus squid 3.8 n.d. n.d. Parschisturella carinata squid 2.2 n.d. n.d. Tryphosella murrayi fish squid 2.1 1.4 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. Waldeckia obesa fish squid 3.1 2.2 33 n.d. 67 n.d. It clearly appears that feeding rates present large variations (one order of magnitude) with respect to amphipod species. But, for a given species, these rates, albeit slightly different, are not strongly influenced by the kind of offered food. It must be pointed out that the data presented in Table II are average values over several feeding experiments, and that results from each experiment are average values over several days (cfr. M&M). An example of the day-to-day variations in the feeding rate during an experiment with X. xxxxxxxxx is shown in Figure 12. Feeding 0,12 0,1 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0 0,12 0,1 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 PS17 PS18 PS21 Nut Nut 193 Nut 192 Nut 168 PS Nut1 PS Nut8 Nut 169 PS19 PS20 PS22 Figure 13: Feeding rates (mean + day-to-day variations) of Waldeckia obesa fed with squid (circles) or fish (squares) during different experiments. Numbers above bars indicate numbers of specimens used for each experiment. is obviously not constant, and a kind of cycle (rhythm?) is observed with periods of intense activity and periods of quasi fasting, maybe corresponding to the digestion time. A high feeding rate is always noticed at the beginning of experiment, after the starvation phase. In the same way, rather important differences can be seen when comparing the rates estimated for distinct experiments (example of W. obesa in Figure 13), as results may vary by a factor of 4 to 5.
TABLE II. Means, standard deviations, correlations and reliabilities IJM 28,8
TABLE II. PER UNIT ROYALTY FOR UNITS IN EXCESS OF VOLUME BAND UPPER LIMIT. NET SALES PRICE [*****] ***** Confidential Treatment Requested SCHEDULE B LZS Terms Royalties for each LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCT shall be payable according to the following Current License Fee Schedule: [*****] The Average Selling Price (ASP) of LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCTS is the average forcasted selling price for all LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCTS during the applicable year. The Total Units is the volume of LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCTS forecasted for shipment during the applicable year. If LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCTS comprises multiple products, Total Units is the sum of all LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCTS and the ASP is the average of the ASP for each of the products comprising LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCTS. In the case of LICENSED MOTOROLA LZS PRODUCTS where data compression is sold as an option, the ASP is the ASP of the option together with the host product or host platform having the option. If multiple compression libraries (e.g., separate versions of LZS DATA COMPRESSION software for different platforms, or software for one or other platforms that embodies enhancements to LZS DATA COMPRESSION developed by MOTOROLA) are used, then the royalty payable shall be calculated as follows: The royalty for each individual library is calculated separately using the procedures described above. The total License Fee will be the sun of 1) the largest License Fee plus 2) half of the sum of all other License Fees. The Current License Fee Schedule above shall be updated on the anniversary of this AGREEMENT by STAC's then Current License Fee Schedule, which shall not have an amount of increase in royalties of more that [*****] from the Current License Fee Schedule for the prior applicable year. Such updated License Fee Schedule shall ***** Confidential Treatment Requested become the Current License Fee Schedule for the subsequent year of this AGREEMENT. EXHIBIT C INDUSTRY AGREEMENT PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on this ___ day of _________ by and between Stac, Inc., a California corporation having an office at 12630 Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx 000, Xxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 00000-0000 (xxreinafter called "STAC"), and __________, hereinafter called "LICENSEE").
TABLE II. PER UNIT ROYALTY FOR UNITS IN EXCESS OF VOLUME UPPER LIMIT. [*****] ***** Confidential Treatment Requested
TABLE II. [*] for Months [*]