Examples of WRPA 1999 in a sentence
If the member‘s benefits were at the date of death subject to a reduction under section 31 of WRPA 1999, any eligible child‘s pension must be calculated as though that reduction had not been made.
Payment of benefits: general Reduction in pension debit member’s benefits191.—(1) The benefits to which a pension debit member is entitled under Part 7 are subject to the reduction to be made under section 31 of WRPA 1999.(2) Member contributions and payments for added pension refunded under Part 10 to a pension debit member are subject to the reduction to be made under section 31 of WRPA 1999.
The annual rate of surviving adult’s pension payable in respect of a pension debit member is calculated by reference to the pension debit member’s rights under these Regulations as reduced under section 31 of WRPA 1999.
The benefits to which a pension debit member is entitled under this Part are subject to the reduction to be made under section 31 (reduction of benefit) of WRPA 1999.
By contrast, in the submission of the trustees in bankruptcy before the referring court, the provisions of national law at issue, in particular Section 11 of the WRPA 1999, do not constitute, even in of themselves, an obstacle to Mr M.’s freedom of establishment; they did not appear to have deterred him from exercising that right.
As stated by informant 2:”For infaq and sedekah, we also differentiate into 2 mbak, which is infaq bound and unbound, if the funds are used as agreed contracts”.In the distribution of infaq and alms LAZ Malang Independent Orphans differentiate into 2, namely bound funds in which the funds are used in accordance with the contract agreed upon with donors in the beginning, for example, donors want their funds for Qurban.
In addition, the existence of a potential restriction on a fundamental freedom cannot be called into question by the mere fact that, apparently, Section 11 of the WRPA 1999 did not actually have any dissuasive effect on Mr M since he moved to the United Kingdom notwithstanding that provision.
In their defence, Mr M and Others claimed that EU law, in particular Articles 21, 45 and 49 TFEU, Article 24 of Directive 2004/38 and Article 7(2) of Regulation No 492/2011, require that any rights accrued under the pension scheme at issue in the main proceedings be excluded from the bankruptcy estate as rights accrued under an approved pension arrangement for the purposes of Section 11 of the WRPA 1999.
In light of the overriding objective the TiBs should not be permitted to run that defence In confirming that s11(2)(a) WRPA 1999 should therefore be read down to include an exclusion of pension rights under a scheme established in another Member State which was “recognised for tax purposes ” in that state, the judge said that his findings would only bind the parties to the litigation.
Pursuant to Section 12(2) of the WRPA 1999, by regulations 4 to 6 of the 2002 Regulations, a bankrupt can either apply to the court in which the bankruptcy proceedings were opened for an exclusion order for the purpose of excluding his rights wholly or in part under an unapproved pension arrangement from his bankruptcy estate by reference to the future likely needs of him and his family or reaching a qualifying agreement to similar effect with his trustee in bankruptcy.