MICHAEL J. CHIARAPPA
XXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXXX
The Crab House on Oyster Creek: Folkloristic Response to Vernacular Landscape and its Environmental Moorings
Résumé
La Maison du crabe Xxxxxxxx, sur Oyster Creek (le « ruisseau aux Huîtres ») est située sur une voie d’eau faisant partie du large environnement estuarien qui s’étend de Great Bay à la rivière Mullica, au New Jersey. Ce type de bâtiment a longtemps servi aux pêcheurs d’huîtres, de palourdes, de crabes, de poisson et aux chasseurs de gibier d’eau sur les rives de l’océan Atlantique et de la baie Delaware. Cette maison, vieille de près de quatre-vingt-dix ans, est idéalement située pour que Xxxx Xxxxxxxx puisse chercher des crabes dans les marais adjacents et préparer ses prises pour le marché. Ce bâtiment, de pair avec son bateau et son attirail de pêche, organise les contours de son paysage de travail ; ces outils ne définissent pas seulement l’adaptation de ce métier à l’environnement mais, en tant qu’assemblage, font continuellement progresser l’acquisition par Xxxxxxxx d’un savoir écologique traditionnel. Bien que sa présence austère dans les marais salants signale son adaptation environnementale et son rôle d’aiguille de la boussole occupationnelle d’Xxxxxxxx, le fait que sa fonction de paysage de travail perdure résonne fortement à travers la communauté. Le travail et la vie sociale qui se déroulent dans ce bâtiment évoquent sa capacité de s’attirer de nombreux affiliés, ses caractéristiques, son usage et sa situation ayant tous une qualité de profondeur esthétique et performative qui en font une pierre angulaire de l’expérience de l’environnement et du sens du lieu. Ces attributs – et en particulier leur rôle dans l’apaisement de la mémoire et l’affirmation des ancrages environnementaux de la communauté
– montrent comment la maison du xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, et les autres bâtiments similaires qui l’ont précédée, ont provoqué une réaction de folklorisation pendant plus de cent cinquante ans.
Abstract
The Xxxxxxxx crab house on Oyster Creek is located on a waterway that is part of the wider estuarine environment consisting of New Jersey’s Great Bay and the Mullica River. It is a building type that has long served oystermen, clammers, crabbers, finfishers, and waterfowlers along New Jersey’s Atlantic Ocean and Delaware Bay coastlines. Having survived for almost ninety years, the building’s siting allows Xxxx Xxxxxxxx to effectively tend the adjacent crabbing grounds and prepare the catch for market. The building, along with his boat and harvesting gear organizes the contours of his working landscape, tools that do not simply define the occupation’s environmental fit, but, as an assemblage, continually advance Xxxxxxxx’x acquisition of traditional ecological knowledge. While its stark presence on the salt marsh punctuates its environmental fit and role as the axis of Xxxxxxxx’x occupational map, its enduring function as a working landscape resonates widely throughout the community. The work and social life of the building speak to its capacity to be broadly affiliative, its features, use, and siting laden with aesthetic and performative depth that make it a touchstone of environmental experience and sense of place. These attributes—specifically their role in curating memory and affirming a community’s environmental moorings—show how the Xxxxxxxx crab house, and similar buildings that preceded it, have engendered folkloristic response for over one hundred and fifty years.
Fig. 1
Xxxxxxxx Crab House on Oyster Creek, Xxxxxxxx Township, New Jersey. Photograph by author.
When, in the 1930s, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx—often viewed as New Jersey’s first folklorist—made his way out to Leeds Point along Southern New Jersey’s Atlantic Coast, then to its terminus at Oyster Creek and the expanses of Great Bay, he used the vernacular landscape to retrieve what he perceived as the area’s “forgotten” history. Taking his cues from extant and ruined building stock, and from stories about them as told by informants he met along the way, he challenged historians “to find…what went on, years ago, in a variety of scattered places, in the words of those we have met to talk to.” Beck was “in search of coherent folk lore,” and, anticipating the field’s growing priorities, took measure of the vernacular landscape and the words of his informant, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, to better understand how past and pre- sent livelihoods relied on “‘the sea and salt tang of the air’” for their sustenance. Drawn by words and place, Xxxx proceeded from the area’s piney woods to Great Bay’s marshy littoral and a telling encounter with its vernacular landscape. It was dotted with small buildings used by baymen who clammed, oystered, crabbed, fin fished, hunted, and trapped, and, to a lesser degree, by some who simply wanted to dwell by the bay during their leisure hours. Xxxx’x arrival made him party to a historically charged, folkloristically inspired
encounter with this vernacular landscape and its estuarine siting. But, somewhat unbeknownst to him, he was not the first, nor would he be the last, to be affected by this experience (Beck 1937: 7-8, 118-20).
Describing his quest for “coherent folk lore” and reflecting further on his task, Xxxx was actually revealing his desire to present the mythic layering of the vernacular landscape—the meaningful history that was at work in the richly textured experience of local life (Beck 1937: 8). Today, this location—which captured Xxxx’x imagination and his hope to use folklife to expand historical narrative—is the site of the only active crab house on Oyster Creek—the place from where Xxxx Xxxxxxxx continues to work the crabbing and waterfowling grounds of Great Bay (Figs. 1, 2). Xxxxxxxx’x enduring use of his crab house and the collective affirmation it engenders from those who work and socialize there, who visit periodically, or who simply encounter it by chance after a long foray to the end of Leeds Point, make it a place of practicalities, but also a place where folk history’s mythic veil is still in play. Overtones of Xxxx’x sentiment continue to wash over the starkly perched crab house on Oyster Creek, as does a longer tradition of canonizing the marine environment’s working landscapes
as icons of regional identity. Our encounter with this site gives way to the folklorist’s urge to reckon, to begin unravelling an environmentally sublime setting whose mythic pull, in the words of Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, culturally nourishes past and present “through the daily rhythms of work and play of its moment, softly coaxing people while they construct their realities” (Glassie 1988 [1977]: 72).
Located slightly north of Atlantic City, New Jersey sits Great Bay, one of the state’s largest estuarine environments, a body of water serving as the terminus of the Mullica River and a gateway to the Atlantic Ocean. Rimming Great Bay are vast expanses of salt marshes that are cut through by numerous creeks and sluices. These waterways traditionally serve as points of entry for baymen who harvest Great Bay’s marine resources, places containing modest arrangements of fish, crab, or clam houses, docks and wharves, and moored boats. Approaching these settings by land or water when they are framed by the verdant sedge grasses of summer or their golden-brown hues of winter, is to begin grasping the juncture they occupy in maintaining the collective reach of those who work the water. Such cultural landscapes embody the toil and sensory response inherent in architectural thresholds where land and water meet. Honing human experience in biologically rich, tenuously controlled marine environments, these buildings have enticed the folkloristic sensibility of observers for well over a century and a half.
Near Great Bay, in December of 1876, Xxxx Xxxxxxx crossed the bayman’s threshold domain when his train “enter’d a broad region of salt grass meadows, intersected by lagoons, and cut up everywhere by watery runs. The sedgy perfume, delightful to my nostrils ... I could have journeyed contentedly till night through these flat and odorous sea prairies.” Moved, but not deluded, by the salt marsh’s intoxicating sulpheric scent, Xxxxxxx’x ambient response laid bare the bayman’s ecologically poetic working landscape, but did not shy away from the primal forces con- fronted by the occupation’s place-making in the liminal realm. As later versions of Leaves of Grass would reveal, he had “the wish to write a piece, perhaps a poem, about the sea-shore—that sug- gesting, dividing line, contact, junction, the solid marrying the liquid” where his own existential
quest could find affiliation—indeed repose—in the biologically and physically dynamic context of the bayman’s working landscape (Xxxxxxx 1907: 88). If needing recent translation, it is the Whitmanesque statement by Xxxx Xxxxxxx that the bayman’s buildings and boats make “what happens in the marginal zone ... exactly that which is important, intrinsic, essential, that which illuminates not only larger issues of landscape, of environmental presentiments, but whole components of American culture” (Xxxxxxx 1994: 10). Quite simply, it is recognition of cultural landscape’s effort to animate and harmonize an ecosystem, what the American poet characterized as a “blending of the real and ideal,” a response to an enduring “liquid, mystic theme” (Xxxxxxx 1907: 88-89).
When Xxxx Xxxxxxx extolled the virtues of the “xxxxxxx and the clamdigger” in Leaves of Grass, it was one of his many visceral responses to American occupational folklife and its tether to both the country’s natural resources and to the locally constructed settings where it gained meaningful expression. After time spent with the aforementioned baymen, he informed read- ers of their xxxxxx vernacular landscape where, after harvesting clams, the work setting’s social and environmental priorities converged: “You should have been with us that day round the chowder-kettle” (Xxxxxxx 1992: 35). Indeed, in his ecopoetics, Xxxxxxx was seemingly throw- ing an ethnographic lifeline to folkloristically inspired observers who would henceforth have
Fig. 2
Xxxx Xxxxxxxx. Photograph by author.
Fig. 3
“The Fishing Village at Nauvoo, New Jersey.” Harpers Weekly vol. 12, no. 608, August 22,
1868.
to reckon with fishing places as both tool and expression of deep, intimate local living and the “unfailing perception of beauty” emerging from it (Xxxxxxx, Leaves of Grass [1855] qtd. in Killingsworth 2004: 95). From his native Long Island to the shorelines of Southern New Jersey, Xxxxxxx looked to evoke the multiple essences—some historical, some emergent—of dwelling and working in the littoral zone. He imbued them with what can be described, in the words of Xxxxx Xxxx, as an “erotics of place,” the lure of places “we believe we need—to survive, flourish, multiply, elaborate” and have “invited and aroused extraordinary passions.” From this perspective, it warrants comparing the attention garnered by the bayman’s work environment to Xxxx’x views of his native Butte, Montana and the expectations of its mining landscape—“ through the lens of human desire” (Xxxx 2010: 2-3). Setting this up in verse, Xxxxxxx proclaimed:
O to go back to the place where I was born, To hear the birds sing once more,
To ramble about the house and barn and over the fields
once more,
And through the orchard and along the old lanes once more.
O to have been brought up on bays, lagoons, creeks, or
along the coast,
To continue and be employ’d there all my life,
The briny and damp smell, the shore, the salt weeds exposed at low water,
The work of fishermen, the work of the eel-fisher and clam-fisher;
I come with my clam rake and spade, I come with my eel-spear
Is the tide out? I join the group of clam- diggers on the flats,
I laugh and work with them, I joke at my work like a mettlesome young man.
(Xxxxxxx 1992: 324-25)
This sentiment drove Xxxxxxx to see a transcendent convergence between local culture and local environments, and his sensory response to his beloved estuarine ecology only heightened the affective depth of his shared experience.
Xxxxxxx’x musings correlate with folklor- istic sentiment that rippled widely throughout America well into the 20th century. Folklorist Xxxxxx Xxxxxx calls this pattern “the aesthetic of the common man”—the notion that vernacular landscape embodied authentic American experi- ence borne of its users’ interactions with the country’s natural endowments (Bendix 1997: 72- 73). This strain of American romanticism gradu- ally consumed the energy of observers interested in clarifying the traditions and environmental fit of a fishing community’s working landscape, a movement whose folkloristic resiliency could be measured by diverse chroniclers ranging from writers and painters to photographers and government reporters. Visual and written narratives of these sites began gracing the pages of Harper’s (Weekly and Monthly) and Scribner’s with ever greater frequency starting in the 1870s, and by the turn of the 20th century were fully ensconced in America’s most popular printed media (Figs. 3 and 4).
The U.S. Fish Commission seized on similar presentational strategies of these sites to provide ethnographic bearings for advancing progres- sive management and scientific advice for the nation’s fisheries (Pauly 2000: 44-70). Xxxxxxxx who attended increasingly popular art colonies along the Atlantic coastline between New Jersey and Maine—such as the Rocky Neck Art Colony in Gloucester, Massachusetts and the Cos Cob Art Colony in Greenwich, Connecticut—found
the vernacular architecture of nearby fishing communities to be ideal subject matter for expressing regional identity in coping with the tensions of rapid industrial transformation. Near Great Bay and the confines of Oyster Creek, a number of painters emphasized Impressionist technique to echo the nobility Xxxxxxx saw in the Jersey xxxxxx’x working landscape (Xxxxxx 2001: 86-87; Xxxxxx 2008; Xxxxxxxx 2013). As American visual artists became more entrenched in the country’s cultural politics and the pull of re- gional romanticism, their work did not shy from incorporating the variety of human activities that occurred at working waterfronts. Less inclined to solely depict buildings, their scenes were now contextually alive with people talking, preparing food for market, building and repairing boats, and engaging in leisure activities—occupational pursuits that were becoming notable genres of the emerging folklore studies movement. Although not as committed to including people in his work, well-known artist Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx was gripped by emergent folkoristic sentiment and its response to vernacular architecture. Deeply attached to the settings of his native Ipswich, Massachusetts, he was among a cohort whose varied visual media canonized clam shanties and assorted fishing buildings in an effort to portray authentic American regional culture. Harmonizing work and nature in his depictions of clam shanties, Xxx sought to “dignify” their placement amidst the “beautiful distances” of the salt marsh, and, in his efforts to advance early historic preservation policy in Ipswich, used his work to underscore the necessity of conserving traditional working landscapes (Xxxxxxxxxxx 2007: 32-33, 37, 41-42).
These sentiments gave way to the intellectual and political ambitions of the American regional- ist movement of the 1920s and 1930s which viewed the country’s folk cultures as critical touchstones of a newly constituted national iden- tity. Vernacular landscape figured prominently in this movement, its resiliency and adaptability befitting what X.X. Xxxxxx saw as the emergent quality of folk expression. Not surprising, this outlook found favour with some of Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx’x most notable New Deal Programs. For Xxxxxx, along with other participants in the Works Progress Administration’s (WPA) Federal Writers Project, their work brought sharp focus to
Fig. 4
“Where the Soft-Shell Crab Abideth.” Once a Week: An Illustrated Weekly Newspaper vol. 5, no. 13, July 15, 1890. A montage depicting various aspects of catching and processing blue-claw crabs on New Jersey’s Shark River north of Great Bay.
the aesthetics and use of vernacular landscapes, seeing them as folk expressions arising from “intimacy with specific environments” (Dorman 1993: 83, 89-92, 95-97, 103-104, 113-14, 119-22,
141-42, 148-54). This documentary spirit brought greater qualitative scrutiny to the previously picturesque evaluations of fishing architecture, and framed a building’s compelling aesthetics alongside its economic function and social necessity, as well as its role in fostering traditional ecological knowledge—insights gained through
years of working the water. Although in its formative stages, this documentary template was revealed in WPA writer Xxxxx Xxxxxx’x Cape Cod Pilot when he remarked:
There are a few of the old-time “fish stores” left in Provincetown—rough gray sheds on the harborfront where the men store their gear—and though these ramshackle ware- rooms are seldom noticed by the crowds that motor up and down Commercial Street, it is here that one must come, really to know the fishermen; here one must sit and listen to the talk, when the February sleet is falling, and the harbor is banging away at the bulkheads alongshore under a southeast blow. (Xxxxxx 1985 [1937]: 233)
The cultural temperament that drove this regional longing, and shaped
the complex desires behind its “mythic valence” (Glassie 1988 [1977]: 72) descended on the working landscapes of clammers, crabbers, finfish- ers, and waterfowlers along Great Bay and its tributaries, as well as on similar sites throughout Southern New Jersey. The watercolour- ist, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx (1838-1923), made the bay- man’s working landscape in Southern New Jersey a staple of his work, also rendering these scenes as etchings, and
to a lesser extent, as oil paintings (Figs. 5 and 6). Having exhibited at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts and influenced by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxx, he moved to Atlantic City in the 1890s (nearly adjacent to Great Bay and its tributaries) and his artistic focus became even more fixed on maritime landscapes and their natural environments (Grzesiak 1993: 8-17). Juxtaposed against the backdrop of Atlantic City—America’s most metropolitan seaside resort of the era—images of bayman tonging for oysters or raking clams made for poignant depictions of tradition bearers labouring under the tourist gaze of the Philadelphia/New York City urban corridor. Similar visibility prompted the U.S. Fish Commission to document buildings used to facilitate the transplanting and cleansing of
Fig. 5
The Old Landing, ca. 1890-1900, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, watercolour. Collection of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx.
Fig. 6
Sunset, Maurice River, NJ, ca. 1880-1890, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, etching. Collection of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx.
oysters in the Great Bay vicinity (Fig. 7). At the same time, as the area’s land became more desir- able for real estate development, images of the bayman’s working landscape were used to market the appeal of living in a marine locale (Fig. 8).
Early 20th-century photographers of Southern New Jersey’s marine landscapes— whether depicting fishing, clamming, crabbing, oystering, trapping or hunting—enhanced public understanding of how the vernacular architecture of each activity functioned and broadened occupational folklife’s role in fuelling the region’s environmental imagination. Working as a journalist and photographer, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx’x exhaustive catalogue of Southern New Jersey’s Delaware Bay shad, sturgeon, and oyster fishing architecture produced an unmatched visual narrative that ushered viewers through every step of moving marine products from their waterborne environment to market. Having garnered a regional and national reputation as a writer on fisheries, agriculture, and a host of other natural resource use issues—as well as being a noted commentator on emerging environmental- ism—her visual narratives of the region’s fishing architecture corresponded with the depth of her journalistic work. Viewed accordingly, her depictions of vernacular architecture revealed a significant reckoning between folklife and a rising tide of ecological consciousness. When she chronicled the long tenure of shad xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx “Catfish Xxxxx” Xxxxxxx, who “lived in a little shanty erected upon an army pontoon,” she elaborated on its placement amidst the “thriving village of cabins, built on scows and piling” around Bayside, New Jersey “where fishermen
... hasten to get their boats and nets in working order” (Xxxxxxxx 1903) (Fig. 9). To emphasize the “thriving” pulse of this working landscape, Xxxxxx’x portraits keenly underscored the fishery’s reach throughout the community—a place where the collective affiliation of men, women, and children found expression at the local boardinghouse or in a space on the salt marsh where gill nets were maintained (Figs. 10 and 11). Ethnographically rich, her series of images conveyed the environmental fit of these built environments and the manner in which they animated the amphibious interface of land and water settings; in short, she participated in a documentary tradition that clarified fishery
Fig. 7
Oyster house on Lakes Bay, just south of Oyster Creek and Great Bay, ca. 1880s, drawing by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, from Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx, The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the United States, section 5, Plates, U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries (Washington, D.C.: G.P.O., 1887).
Fig. 8
Image of oyster house and oyster boats on Lakes Bay used to promote real estate development outside of Atlantic City, New Jersey by brokers Xxxxxx and Farr. Employing associational advertising that touted the virtues of the area’s marine environment and occupations, the caption reads: “View of Lakes Bay, at Pleasantville, showing xxx xxxx of an old Oyster house. Pleasantville is noted for its Oyster Beds, the celebrated Xxxxxxx Salts coming from this Bay. The oyster trade is one of the most important industries of Pleasantville, furnishing employment to over three hundred men.” Collection of Xxxxxxx
X. Xxxxxxxxx.
architecture as a compass of each of its occupant’s attenuated marine domains.
The reach of such visual expression deepened when photographer Xxxxxx Xxxxx—a contem- porary of Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx—began his documentary work on New Jersey’s Delaware Bay oyster fishery. While most of Porch’s pho- tography of oystering architecture was intended to serve distinctly promotional goals for the area’s industry, it was also, in the emerging era of Progressive governance in the United States, visu- ally deployed to show that tradition and regional identity would hold their place amidst the state’s regulatory oversight and scientific investigations of the fishery (Figs. 12 and 13). His photography of oystering architecture graced the pages of New Jersey Bureau of Shell Fisheries Reports, New Jersey State Industrial Reports, New Jersey Board of Health Reports, and state-mandated textbooks for elementary and secondary school students. Aspirational in nature, Xxxxx’x depic- tions of vernacular architecture in these outlets tangibly reinforced societal expectations that a resource—oysters—held as common property by the state’s citizens and harvested by one of its most iconic folk communities, could serve the greater public good through coordination of occupational tradition and centralized govern- ment. Such photographic portrayal found itself awash in America’s diverse exercise of folkloristic sentiment, not reducible to one objective, but
Fig. 9
Xxxxxxx “Catfish Billy” Xxxxxxx in front of his shanty at Bayside, New Jersey, ca. 1903- 1904. Photograph by Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. Courtesy of Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx.
Fig. 10
Boardinghouse at Bayside, New Jersey, ca. 1903-1904. Photograph by Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. Courtesy of Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx.
Fig. 11
Maintaining gill nets used in the shad fishery at Bayside, New Jersey, ca. 1903-1904. Photograph by Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. Courtesy of Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx.
Fig. 12
Floating cabin at Bivalve, New Jersey, ca. 1905-1910. These dwellings were used by oystermen, baymen and shad and sturgeon fishermen throughout Southern New Jersey. Photograph by Xxxxxx Xxxxx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Collection, Bayshore Center, Port Xxxxxx, NJ.
often caught in a mix of nostalgia, commercial promotion, and regional boosterism. But these visual strategies also showed murmurings of the emergent American regionalist movement and its desire to draw inspiration from the aestheticized dimensions of folk culture—the expressive power of its practice. Vernacular landscape’s organic sensibility was central to these aims and fit broad progressive plans to advance the socially and environmentally integrative benefits of America’s folk communities (Chiarappa 2019; Dorman 1993: 103-104, 119-22, 135-36).
Journalistic accounts and government reporting—in both written and photographic outlets—on what became recognized as the quintessential New Jersey xxxxxx’x shelter, along with the structure’s wider pictorial dissemination on real photographic postcards, contributed to making it a widely recognized motif of regional affiliation. Endowed with a degree of typological flexibility, the minimalist appearance of these structures and their wider working landscape steadily gave way to intrigue over their standing as a bellwether of the region’s mythic values. Regional writers probed this condition, seeing the environmental and social synthesis of these vernacular landscapes as an enduring, and at times fading, marker of authentic American ex- perience. In his 1931 portrayal of Xxxxxxxx Xxx, A.
P. Xxxxxxxxxx used its “waters and shores ... to tell of the folk who dwell about the bay, who sail and fish upon it.” For him, an inspiring, yet threatened authenticity was passing and soon there would be “no more bayman and marsh-men, no more women with red blood in their cheeks.” A focal point of Xxxxxxxxxx’x observation was the “hut” of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, a place he scrupulously described but was at great pains to typologically cast. He contemplated: “what is [it] that stands yonder on the meadows, small and square and black,” but whose “six feet by ten feet” dimensions served as “the hailing port” from where Xxxxxx did “ ‘ a leetle fishin’, shootin’, or trappin’” (Xxxxxxxxxx 1931: v, 122-30).
Not far from Great Bay and the working venues that dotted its creeks and sluices, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx—a Professor of English at the University of Pennsylvania and an unabashed romantic who characterized himself as “one who holds with the Old Ways”—lamented encroachments on the bayman’s estuarine world
by vacationers who created “bungalowdom” on his working landscape (Figs. 14 and 15). While walking toward a sea island shack with a bayman who was selling his dunescape to vacationers, he described his guide as wracked with ambivalence and “feeling ... down deep ... that he was betraying his native heath to the hosts of outlanders ... who had turned the beauty, so grey and lonely, of his beach hills into flat and featureless suburban nothingness” (Weygandt 1940: 333-36). As Weygandt roamed Southern New Jersey, he incorporated folklore’s artifactual and oral genres into his assessments of the region’s distinctive sense of place, and, recognizing this expressive mix, accounted for its usefulness in understand- ing the working landscape’s environmental fit.
But if a certain artifactual and verbal ecol- ogy animated the bayman’s built environment, Xxxxxxxx was not alone in seeing it. When Xxxx Xxxxxx—an architect who was largely responsible for canonizing waterfowl decoys as American folk art—did his fieldwork in the 1920s and 1930s, he drew his conclusions based on countless visits to shacks used by baymen along New Jersey’s coast- line between Xxxxxxxx Xxx and Great Bay, as well as those in locations spanning the entire east coast of the United States. One commentator praised him for his ability “to lounge up to a shoresman and drop into easy conversation with him, how to win his confidence with knowing, sympathetic talk of boats and tides and birds…a tribute to his understanding of shore folk and decoys” (Add Americana: The Decoy, 1932: 38). Xxxxxx’x exploration of waterfowl decoys sharpened his view of their contribution to the bayman’s wider
Fig. 13 (above) Oyster houses and vessels at Bivalve, New Jersey, ca. 1905-1910. Photograph by Xxxxxx Xxxxx. Collection of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx.
Fig. 14 (opposite, top) Aerial view of “Bungalowdom” at Oyster Creek, 1946.
Atlantic County Historical Society.
Fig. 15 (opposite) “Bungalowdom” at Oyster Creek, 2019. Photograph by author.
material world, and, in the process, led him to celebrate the shanty’s role in it. So moved, he penned a collection of verse that opened and closed with poems respectively titled “Shanty Preface” and “Shanty Poetry,” and, to underscore the volume’s response to cultural landscape and estuarine ecology, sported an illustration of a classic xxxxxx’x shanty on the frontispiece. The collection, labelled ‘Long Shore and published in 1939, thoughtfully evoked the bayman’s estuarine experience and sought to viscerally convey the shanty’s role in organizing it (Xxxxxx 1939: 1-2, 108; 1954 [1934]).
Not unlike others who wrote on Southern New Jersey’s maritime folk cultures, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx typically employed a processional
narrative, a rhetorical strategy where he took readers on a journey to discover the mythic quality of the region’s vernacular landscapes and the people who animated them. Xxxx’x earliest writing embraced this approach, putting readers alongside informants who used buildings and landscapes as archives of their community’s collective memory. But, in Jersey Genesis, as the title implies, Xxxx’x ethnographic ambition took a decidedly incisive turn toward the mythic. Specifically, he desired to portray the working landscapes at the juncture of the Mullica River and Great Bay as living legacies, places where a usable past deeply informed those who utilized the marine resources of this lush estuarine environment (Beck 1945).
Beck keyed on signature buildings and artifacts that were gateways to understanding the folkloristic relevance of this marine setting— places where work never veered from affirming the collective obligations of those who lives were shaped by the river and bay. Central to this endeavour, Xxxx reprised his earlier encounter with Xxxxx Xxxxxx, seeing in these previous travels the need for “authentic talking” if one was to decipher the enduring historical relevance of placemaking at Oyster Creek. He coupled these folkloristic leanings to descriptions of Xxxxxxx Xxxx’x boatyard as the setting of an artisan who “lets his boats speak for themselves” and after they were “ ‘lanched’ ... continued to follow them as if they were members of his family.” More frequently, he extolled hard-bitten work experi- ence, whether it was the sight of Xxxxxxx Xxxxx (in Beck’s words, a “surviving anachronism”) harvesting salt hay and transporting it on his salt hay barge or his encounter with Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, who—in his eighties—would emerge from his “scowboat” (a houseboat) and build rowboats, but, in his earlier years, had clammed and oystered on Great Bay. Xxxx punctuated these observations when he visited Xxx Xxxx “on the porch of the weather-blackened house his grandfather had built ... leaning back on the settee made by his grandfather’s father,” sporting “his great shaggy head ... blown wild all that day by winds that swept down Little Egg Harbor and in across Great Bay, rocking his clamming xxxxxx [boat].” Ancestral connections—artifactual, oc- cupational and environmental in scope—gripped Sooy, his patrimony giving way to the everyday
exigencies of work, his harvesting of “clams and oysters the daily fulfillment of a sacred trust” (Beck 1945: 45-46, 61, 76, 102-104, 205-206). Few
informants moved Beck like Xxxx, his presence and testimony compelling in their own right, but doubly heightened by the manner in which his material world curated bodily experience and environmental longing. Beck recounted:
I looked at him then and again later, when he came downstairs with a flag of thirteen stars, family heritage like the house, the road, the old settee. I marveled at the strength of his arms, muscles that rippled through the gray shirt, open at the neck. Life danced from twinkling eyes, matching the vigor that remained to run out the anchor of a big xxxxxx and work the clam tongs every day Now his
age was unimportant. “I ain’t old,” he had said. “Any anyhow, we don’t die down here.” (Beck 1945: 57-58, emphasis added)
Never overlooking a mythic tether to what he saw as the “real America,” Xxxx’x readership joins him in a roving narrative crafted to confront tensions arising from the clash of tradition and modernity. Starting at the confluence of Great Bay and the Mullica River and moving upstream, his waterborne procession appeared to be strikingly shadowed by the “hypocrisies ...
and the ambiguities of ‘civilization’” presented in Xxxxxx Xxxxxx’x Heart of Darkness (Denby 1995: 118). When challenged for being overly romantic about the enduring practices of those who worked the Mullica River and Great Bay, he strongly disagreed, claiming that human agency and a historically-charged landscape was being sorely underestimated:
The world didn’t give them up at all. They gave up the world. They discovered they had something infinitely more important than all the world could give them. They decided to hold on to it, to make it serve what they needed from life. There is more of the real America inside and around houses in these villages up and down the river than anybody thinks. (Beck 1945: xi)
During the latter half of the 20th century, Beck’s Jersey Xxxxxxx played no small role in fuel- ling popular interest in the lower Mullica River and Great Bay. The journeys he described of driv-
ing out dead-end roads to work sites and landings used by baymen soon became common fare of seasonal tourists and automotive day-trippers looking to reconnect with the region’s maritime traditions. Nearby, from the 1950s through 1970s, Xxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxx began assembling what was to become Historic Xxxxxxxxxx Inn and Village—a collection of buildings serving as restaurants, shops, and a living history museum only two and one-half miles from Great Bay and Oyster Creek. Buttressing these trends and reinforcing the living history museum’s focus on Southern New Jersey life, one of the buildings re-located to the site was Xxxxx Xxxxx’x clam shack from Oyster Creek (Courter 2013: 57-114) (Figs. 16 and 17). Xxxx’x footprint, along with those who preceded him, was apparent. The sacralizing overtones of his odyssey up Great Bay and the Mullica River (evident in his book’s title) added a pivotal layer to the observations of those who preceded him—it was explicit affirmation of the enduring utility of traditional cultural landscapes. Xxxxxxxxx at the suggestion that the people and places he portrayed offered “little in the way of new contributions to civilization,” he contended they were “preserving something we lack, a true community kind of living and a talent for mak- ing an economic order work. Their ingenuity is undoubted” (Beck 1945: 251). Xxxx had cast the die, and, as evidenced by Xxxx XxXxxx’x writing and the subsequent study of the region by the Library of Congress’ American Folklife Center in the 1980s, anticipated a new era where cultural conservation and environmental consciousness would converge (XxXxxx 1968; Hufford 1986). The roads and waterways he had travelled were being re-trod, the places he chronicled now sub- ject to a new wave of historical and ethnographic inquiry intent on gleaning, and applying, the lessons of the working landscape. He was leading us to Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’x crab house on Oyster Creek.
Spare and lean in appearance, these features are what endow the bayman’s modest buildings with the versatility needed to harvest marine resources and endure an estuarine environment where one is never totally land or water bound. Such architecture (along with boats and gear it accommodates) is as nearly amphibious or ecologically consonant as the quarry it is designed to pursue, not only mimicking the estuarine environment, but breathing with it.
Fig. 16 (top) Xxxxx Xxxxx clam shack at Historic Xxxxxxxxxx Village,
Xxxxxxxx Township, New Jersey, ca. early 1970s. Collection of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx.
Fig. 17
Floor plan of Xxxxx Xxxxx clam shack. Drawing by author.
Whether approaching the Xxxxxxxx crab house from land or water, its white siding gives it a stark contrasting presence amidst the salt marshes surrounding it (Fig. 18). It sits on pil- ings driven into the salt marsh, and is located directly at water’s edge on Oyster Creek. While the building’s east and south elevations are clad in contemporary white siding, original cedar shingle siding still graces parts of the north and west elevations, and a dormer window on the elevation’s south side completes the retention of historic fabric on the building’s exterior. A wooden walkway or boardwalk runs the exterior length of the building’s south elevation, connect- ing the building to a platform supporting walk-in coolers. This south facing boardwalk is bordered by a marsh/flood plain area made firm by suc- cessive waves of infill, measures taken to provide space for boat storage, crabbing equipment, and vehicle parking. Connected to this boardwalk is another one running the length of the property in a north-south direction along Oyster Creek. Moored to this boardwalk is the Miss Xxxxx, a durable, fiber-glass hulled boat known as a T-Craft that Xxxxxxxx adapted for crabbing and clamming, and later, for guiding waterfowl hunters (Figs. 19 and 20). Honouring tradition,
Fig. 18 (above)
View of Xxxxxxxx crab house from Oyster Creek. Photograph by author.
Fig. 19 (right, upper)
View of Miss Xxxxx from the boat’s bow. Photograph by author.
Fig. 20 (right, lower)
View of Miss Xxxxx from the boat’s stern. Ramp and electric winch for retrieving crab pots is located to the left of the boat’s motor. Photograph by author.
Xxxxxxxx concedes “there is a real history of boat- building in this area ... something great about the craftsmanship,” and he once used a locally-built, cedar-planked, twenty-eight foot (8.5 m) xxxxxx for clamming—a distinctive regional boat type he sheathed in copper to deter ice damage. But he prefers the T-Craft’s maneuverability for crab- bing, and its durability in cold weather months, stating: “When I would go clamming, all the other clammers would wait for me to come out and break ice [with the T-Craft] in the winter” (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, January 9, 2019; August 16, 2019)
Entering the crab house’s original section and flanking the left side of its sliding door entrance, is a sink and counter (Fig. 21). To the immediate right sits a portable grill, refrigerator, and food storage area. Across this entrance area along the building’s north wall sits a wood stove and storage for slip-on fishing boots, waterproof fishing bib pants (overalls), and waterfowling waders, as well as assorted fishing equipment. Completing this area of the building is an open space where new crab pots can be prepared for use or old
ones repaired.1 When not used for these tasks, the space functions as a vibrant social arena where fellow baymen and baywomen, waterfowl hunters, friends, customers, and the occasional unknown, curious (yet welcome) visitor gather for the conversation and food (Figs. 22 and 23). Abutting this area of the building, the later ad- dition retains its shedder tanks but they cease to be used during cold weather and a heavy curtain partitions this space to insure the retention of heat in the original section for waterfowlers who gather before and after hunts.
The original section of the Xxxxxxxx crab house was built circa 1934-1937 by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a bayman from nearby New Gretna. Xxxxxxx used it as an oyster house—for oysters he harvested from his cultivated grounds and for those he bought from other baymen. He also used it as a staging area for offering charter boat services to recreational fishing parties—a practice long pursued by the area’s baymen but one that more nostalgically disposed commentators, such as Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx, saw as potentially “cloaking” the locale’s “forgotten importance”
Fig. 21 (top)
Floor plan of Xxxxxxxx crab house. Drawing by author.
Fig. 22 (middle)
Xxx Xxxxxx (left) and Xxxx Xxxxxxxx (centre) preparing food after a duck hunt. Xxxx Xxxxxx (right) removing waders after a day of duck hunting. Photograph by author.
Fig. 24 (top left)
Appearance of Xxxxxxxx crab house (ca. 1970s) before his acquisition of the building in the early 1980s. Courtesy of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx.
Fig. 25 (above left)
Xxxxxxxx crab house, 1980s. Courtesy of Xxxx Xxxxxxxx.
Fig. 23 (lower)
Socializing after a day of duck hunting. Photograph by author.
Fig. 26 (top right)
Xxxxxxxx crab house after early 2000s addition. Note crab pot storage area in front of building and the arrangement of boardwalk/dock arrangement. Photograph by author.
Fig. 27 (above right)
Interior view of Xxxxxxxx crab house looking east from old section into later addition. Current shedder tanks are located in the later addition. Photograph by author.
and fostering what Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx ruefully characterized as “bungalowdom.” In 1954, Xxxxxx’ son, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, added a one-story, flat- roofed section to the building’s original structure. When Xxxx Xxxxxxxx acquired the building in the early 1980s, its exterior remained largely as it appeared when owned by the Xxxxxxx fam- ily (Figs. 24 and 25), which had now re-located slightly north of Oyster Creek to a building on Nacote Creek. Xxxxxxxx adapted the building’s interior space to accommodate his blue-claw crab fishery. By the late 1990s, deterioration of the building’s later addition led Xxxxxxxx to totally re-build it, replacing its lower, one-story, flat-roofed construction with a taller gable-roofed arrangement that almost identically matched the original structure (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019; August 16,
2019) (Fig. 26).
Xxxxxxxx’x initial changes to the building’s interior started with the construction of wooden shedder tanks in both the original section and its later addition (Fig. 27). Designed to hold shedder crabs (also known as peeler crabs) until they fully molt from their hard carapace and become “soft shells”—a prized delicacy—shedder tanks are filled with brackish water that is circulated by pumps for aeration and removal of toxic waste. For nearly twenty years, these built-in features— totalling eighteen—consumed nearly all the building’s interior space and each one could hold as many as five hundred shedder crabs. The culi- nary quality and marketability of a soft-shell crab hinges on the timing of its removal from various tanks during, and immediately after, the molt. This process was paramount in Xxxxxxxx’x work regimen during these years and governed the human energy expended in the building. Shedder crabs that are beginning to break open from their shells have soft skin and will be preyed upon by other crabs in the tank. Adding to these concerns, a shedder crab that has completed its molt needs to be quickly removed from the tank before “it gets paper [the cellophane-like beginning of new shell growth] on its back” and has its market value compromised. These demands, particularly when Xxxxxxxx handled a high-volume of “shedders,” required almost twenty-four hour oversight of the tanks where, in nearly four to five hour intervals, crabs were separated according to their molting stage. When Xxxxxxxx started to limit his
handling of soft-shell crabs, and gradually ceased to harvest clams during the late fall and winter months, he removed the tanks from the building’s original section (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal com- munication, March 16, 2019; August 16, 2019). He began devoting this space—now more open and versatile—to not only his continuing work as a crabber, but to the logistical and social demands of his waterfowling guide service, known locally as “taking out gunning parties.” Oyster Creek’s architectural arrangements, and the friendships they fostered, facilitated Xxxxxxxx’x transition to guide work in the 1990s (Figs. 28 and 29). Reflecting on these events, Xxxxxxxx states:
Xxxxx Xxxxxx, who had the clam building here [next to Xxxxxxxx’x building], he and another friend of mine, that I knew
Fig. 28
Xxxx Xxxxxxxx setting out decoys. Photograph by author.
Fig. 29
Using the Miss Xxxxx to move Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’x floating duck hunting blind. Photograph by author.
Fig. 30
Moving crabs from the Miss Xxxxx to walk-in coolers. Photograph by author.
Fig. 31
Flooding at the Xxxxxxxx crab house, Fall 2018. Photograph by author.
since we were little kids, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, both of them were from Port Republic, and we all loved gunning since we were little boys. They took parties out. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx loved it, and Xxxx Xxxxxxxx and I got diagnosed with cancer within the same year. But Xxxxxx passed away with it. So a lot of his people that went with him knew, because they would see me—before I’d go clamming I used to go duck hunting a lot of mornings—and they knew I loved duck hunting, and they asked me about taking them out. So that’s how that started for me. (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019)
Occupational tradition shapes the Xxxxxxxx crab house as an architectural response to its environmental context—a place whose interior and exterior spaces breath in tandem with the biological and physical forces of its estuarine setting. Organizing a working landscape that stretches beyond its four walls, it is the compass of bodily engagement with water and marsh and an organizer of traditional ecological knowledge that sustains its occupant’s respected role as a bayman. Clarifying this synthesis, where the con- tingencies of everyday labour, the marketplace, and environment converge, are the site’s exterior spaces. While the site’s boardwalk along Oyster Creek provides mooring for the Miss Xxxxx, it also serves the manageable movement of the day’s catch to appropriate dockside spaces. Bushels of hard-shell crabs are moved along the building’s south facing boardwalk to the walk-in cooler sitting on an elevated platform at the site’s west end (Fig. 30). Soft-shell crabs are unloaded and taken through double doors on the building’s east gable end and placed in shedder tanks. Adjacent to the site’s boardwalks is an area variously used for storing crabbing equipment and parking motor vehicles. Notable in this mix are rows of crab pots—some requiring refurbishing, some simply pulled from use and awaiting resetting, and some needing to be cleansed to remove the accumulation of burdensome aquatic vegetation.
Watching Oyster Creek’s tide rise to meet the top of the crab house’s boardwalks and, at times fully inundating them, is to reckon with the entire site’s elasticity, its capacity to physi- cally embody and culturally archive the lessons of amphibious experience, crafting them into a resilient working landscape. High tides are normal, blow-in tides frequent, and major coastal storms inevitable (Fig. 31). Such considerations put the Xxxxxxxx crab house’s environmental fit at the centre of collective memory concerning the endurance and erasure of buildings at Oyster Creek. The locale’s clam houses are all gone, but Xxxxxxxx’x crab house has weathered natural afflictions for approximately eighty-five years. Such endurance is attributed to the building’s one and one-eighth inch thick base sheathing, nailed diagonally for greater structural strength. The original section’s floor boards are two and one-half inch thick long-leaf yellow pine and are credited with shoring up the building’s fortunes
during Hurricane Sandy in 2012. They show wear patterns of baymen who have trod them over eight decades and their grayish patina is evidence of countless waves of bay water and mud that have inundated the building since it was constructed. After tidal surge deposited mud in the crab house, in the words of one bayman, “the thing to do was to get down there [Oyster Creek] as soon as you could and wash that out, because if that dried, that’s just like glue, that mud. It’s silt” (Xxx Xxxxxx, personal communication, August 24, 2019). Xxx Xxxxxx, whose clam house sat next to the Xxxxxxxx crab house until it was severely damaged by Hurricane Xxxxx, remarks that the height of dock and boardwalk construction at both sites needed to account for Oyster Creek’s tidal action to insure the manageable offloading of a boat’s catch (Fig. 32). For baymen, faulty dock height creates burdensome lifting from moored boats. Xxxxxx has worked at Oyster Creek since he was seven years old, when his site was occupied by his grandfather, Xxxxx Xxxxxx (Fig. 33), and now observes how rising tidal levels complicate the traditional calculus used to determine ap- propriate dock height:
We’d get flooded down there [Oyster Creek] all the time, more so now. The dock that I built, that was built so the tide didn’t come on it [submerge it]. So when you unloaded your clams you were okay. Now it goes under every single day. Northeaster or not. We get wet [the site] on the northeast ... you don’t want it that high, it’s too hard to unload the boat. So you made that [the dock] at a comfort- able height. Well it goes under every day, because the tides come higher every day now ... I don’t know anything about global warming but I know what the tides are doing. (Xxx Xxxxxx, personal communica- tion, August 24, 2019)
Recognition of the working landscape’s environmental fit started early for Xxxx Xxxxxxxx. His grandfather, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, immigrated from Norway in 1889 and worked in a shipyard in Camden, New Jersey where he built, among other watercraft, vessels for the Atlantic menha- den fishery. Reinforcing memory of this family connection to the marine world are ruins of a menhaden reduction plant within view of the crab house. Xxxxxxxx’x father, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx,
and his uncle, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, also worked in Camden’s shipyards, and his father eventually became a tugboat captain. As a boy, Xxxxxxxx’x family frequently visited Port Republic where he
Fig. 32 (top)
Xxx Xxxxxx’x clam house (1987) located alongside of the Xxxxxxxx crab house. Xxxxxx’x building was abandoned after Hurricane Sandy in 2012. Collection of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx.
Fig. 33 (above) Xxxxx Xxxxxx’x oyster and clam house, ca. mid-20th century.
Photograph courtesy of Xxx Xxxxxx.
Fig. 34 (left)
Xxxx Xxxxxxxx duck hunting in the 1960s. Photograph courtesy of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx.
was introduced to duck hunting, and, immersing himself in the area’s surrounding waters, took his first black duck when eight years old. When not hunting, he was fishing for perch in nearby Xxxxxxx Cove. By the age of twelve he had carved his own rig of duck hunting decoys and earned enough money to acquire a sneakbox—arguably the region’s most iconic watercraft—and used it to hunt from Nacote Creek (Fig. 34). In his teens, he began working as a deckhand on party boats used for serving recreational fishers, and gradually began crabbing and clamming. Returning from military service and having embarked on a job he did not find satisfying, he decided to pursue xxxxxxxx and clamming as a full-time occupation (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1930; Georgieff, 2009: 17, 20). He began, in the early 1970s, working the waters of Xxxxxx Xxx and Delaware Bay, areas further south and west of his current location. In the later 1970s, he moved to Green Bank, New Jersey (further up the Mullica River) in order to work Great Bay and its various tributaries, and operated from the Chestnut Neck Boatyard where he moored his boat, stored his crab pots, and maintained a walk-in cooler. It is a transition he tellingly describes: “I moved back up to the area [Great Bay] that I grew up in, was familiar [my emphasis] with” (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019). Long familiar with Oyster Creek’s value as a work site where connections to the area’s crabbing, clamming, and hunting grounds could be maintained, and where water could be readily pumped from the creek to a building containing shedder tanks, he
acquired the crab house in 1981. Familiar xxxxxx had led him back to Oyster Creek.
Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’x crab house is the locus of his working life, a portal to his everyday interactions with the estuarine environment. While readily identifiable as a place where marine resources are moved from their waterborne setting to America’s markets, it is also a place where environmental experience is meaningfully affirmed, coursing through the social and economic reach of Xxxxxxxx’x life. When Xxxxxxxx arrives at the crab house during the morning hours of crab season, he first checks the shedder tanks while his fellow crabber, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, prepares menhaden for the rebaiting of crab pots they will check over the course of the day (Fig. 35). No sooner do they leave the landing at Oyster Creek when they are quickly onto their first line of crab pots. In a motion indicative of years
Fig. 35
Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxx Xxxxxxxx leaving the crab house to tend crab pots. Xxxxxxxx used for rebaiting crab pots sits in front of the steering console. Photograph by author.
Fig. 36
Xxxx Xxxxxxxx retrieving crab pot and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx culling the catch and sorting according to size, sex, and potential as shedders. Undersized crabs are returned to the water. Photograph by author.
of experience, Xxxxxxxx begins retrieving his crab pots with a fluid rhythm—the boat slowly moving, he catches the pot’s buoy line with a retrieving hook, wraps the line around the electric winch, pulls it up the inclined stern platform, and passes it on to Xxxxx to be unloaded. Once in Xxxxx’x hands, the pot’s contents are sorted by size, sex, and potential use as shedders with undersized crabs returned to the water. The crab pot is re-baited with menhaden, locally known as “bunker,” and returned to the water (Figs. 36, 37, 38). The well-honed expenditure of energy and motion displayed in these actions are what allow Xxxxxxxx and his crew to efficiently tend 250 crab pots in a day, and that, during his most active years, allowed him to tend 400 in a day (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019). Aside from unloading the contents of crab pots, some are re-located to areas, typically warmer waters, where crab activity insures the likelihood of greater catch.
The informed placement of crab pots comes from Xxxxxxxx’x years of experience in evaluat- ing bay bottom, water depth, and fluctuations in water temperature and salinity levels; it is a series of calculated measures that effect the volume and profitability of his catch, as well as the energy he expends in any one day. His crab house architecturally moors these decisions, directly siting, and then more extensively mapping, his work on the surrounding waters. An occupational axis, it is the place where tangible experience and perception coalesce to inform yet another day of labour amidst the estuary’s fluctuating biological rhythms; in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx’x words, it is the architectural tether of an environmental relationship that “grinds the mind sharp, honing wits that dull with ease” (Glassie 1982: 422).2 Xxxxxxxx’x own description of the sentiment that infuses his working landscape affirms this folkloristic sentiment: “To me, it’s one of the last lifestyles left in America where you really live by your wits and the whims of nature. There is a real challenge to it and I love it” (Xxxxxx 2010). Elaborating on the role his crab house plays in organizing his work, Xxxxxxxx states:
I’m able to have the building sort of cen- tralize [his work]. My base is centralized in the area that I crab. I have absolutely the best situation, because I’m within 500
yards of where I usually start crabbing in the morning, right out in the bay. And to bring pots in, every so often during the summer, your pots will get growth on them, and you have to bring them in and power wash. If they get too dirty, the crabs won’t even go in there, so your catch is go- ing to diminish. (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019)
Corresponding with the folklorist’s urge to see vernacular architecture as an expression—in- deed, a reckoning—of a user’s immersion in a par- ticular environment is historian Xxxxxxx Xxxxx’x characterization of cultural landscapes as “tools,
Fig. 37
Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx emptying crab pot and rebaiting it with xxxxxxxx. Note the
sorting of crabs in bushel baskets adjacent to the culling bin. Number One and Number Two size male crabs (“Jimmys”) are each placed in separate bushels,
as are female crabs (“Sooks”). Shedders are separated and placed in a rectangular bin below the culling bin. Photograph by author.
Fig. 38
Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx holding a prized Number One sized male, blue-clawed crab—also known as
a “Xxxxx”—typically measuring 5 ½ to 6
¼ inches across its carapace. Photograph by author.
Fig. 39
Map of Great Bay, the Mullica River, and other tributaries worked by Xxxx Xxxxxxxx during his lifetime as a crabber, clammer, and waterfowling guide.
Map by author.
the products of work ... extensions of ourselves” that cultivate “bodily knowledge of the natural world” (White 1996: 172-73). For folklorists, and others who share White’s sensibility, vernacular buildings like the crab house are sites of working memory, places framing years of traditional ecological knowledge that continues to inform the labour of those who use them. Gripped by such spatial memory, Xxxxxxxx reflects on the years when he ventured just south of Great Bay to Reeds Bay whose shallower waters warmed more quickly in spring and promoted earlier crab activity after the species’ dormant winter phase. Now, balancing age and the burden of moving crab pots, he chooses to stay closer to the confines of the crab house: “I may still go to Little Bay, but basically, even in springtime, I don’t go past Little Bay ... I stay up in this area and wait for the crabs to come to me” (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019) (Fig. 39).
At his crab house, the fruits of Xxxxxxxx’x labour collate with his environmental ethic—his reverence for the resource and its sustainability— and his accountability to fellow baymen. These values—the balancing of individual grit and cooperative spirit—are on display in the building as Xxxxxxxx achieves communion with waters that bring cultural and economic sustenance not only to himself, but the wider community. Reflecting, he says:
When I started crabbing, there was only one other person who crabbed [in the area]. But people who got into this after me, they didn’t have to learn by trial and error like I did, that took me years to accu- mulate knowledge of where crabs should be, at a certain time of the year, with a certain salinity, and how much rainfall. All they did was put their pots where they saw my pots. But things were a lot easier for them. And I never held a grudge. It’s just not the way I am and I was lucky enough to make a living from what God put on this earth. So it’s not mine. I’m just lucky enough to make a living harvesting it. So I never felt greedy about it, or like I owned it. (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019)
When Xxxxxxxx expresses his deeply felt connection to Great Bay and its adjacent waters—Mullica River, Wading River, Bass River, Mott Creek, Nacote Creek, Ballanger Creek, and Little Bay—he is, at the same time, harmonizing the occupational, aesthetic, and emotional values embodied in his building. In turn, the structure meaningfully blurs boundaries between interior and exterior space, sacred and secular feeling, work and leisure, natural environment and built environment, marsh and water. It is, in short, a work sphere giving equal way—in organic fash- ion—to an expressive venue, the crab house, the place where Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’x soulful endurance
achieves fulfillment in his working life: “This has been the greatest place for me, the river. I always say ‘God Bless the Mullica River,’ because that makes this place great, that makes this place great [his emphasis]. We have a perfect mix of fresh water coming down and mixing with the inlet.” Reinforcing this sentiment as material expression, the crab house harmonizes or communicatively fuses human intention and nature’s forces, giving tangible reach to Xxxxxxxx’x occupational life and the meaningful affiliations and sense of place it fosters: “This has been a wonderful place, and more than that as I start cutting back on the amount of crabs that I shed out, I’ve removed these tanks [shedder tanks] because I’ve needed more space for people that were hunting here, to come in and change ... but the friends and the camaraderie, the friendship and all down here
... it has been such a big part of my life” (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, August 16, 2019; March 16, 2019).3
Xxxxxxxx’x dedication to his work, and the sentiment flowing from it, frames the manner in which his building accrues meaning. An outcome of the environmental ethic of the bayman—one that eschews a life of ease, yet quietly revels in the rarely experienced intimacies of being immersed in the estuarine world—his building forges a nexus between his personal desire to follow the water and the response it engenders from the community. The building’s expressive depth emerges from its capacity to bring “coher- ent aesthetic sensibility’’ (Xxxxxxx 1988: x) to Xxxxxxxx’x occupation, an aesthetic not defined by usual artistic conventions, but a value placed on meticulous placement and retrieval of crab pots, the sorting of the day’s quarry, the unloading of the Miss Xxxxx, and, when duck season arrives, the informed placement of duck blinds and de- coys. Such actions are laden with the “bioregional intensity” Xxxxxxx observed throughout the American scene (Killingsworth 2004: 100-101), and show the building aesthetically cohering the contours of an environmental experience where discernable skills and expectations resonate (both for practical and emotive reasons) in community life.
recognize the bioregion as the “logical locus ... for a sustainable, regenerative community” (Xxxxxx 2003: 3). The affective power of this convergence of work and architecture gives rise to emergent feeling that produces talk, social interaction, and historical reflection. In this vein, Xxxxxxxx’x crab house emerges as a performative venue, a place that not only structures a working relationship with the estuarine environment, but one where deeply felt experience affirms those relation- ships—not only for Xxxxxxxx, but all those who feel, or desire, a stake in his enterprise and the tradition he upholds.4
The stories and social life that unfold in the crab house extend its role as a cultural anchor. Being the centrepiece of everyday dialogue, the building cultivates a sense of belonging and a col-
Fig. 40
Xxx Xxxxxx preparing for a day of crabbing on Great Bay and its tributaries. Photograph by author.
Fig. 41
Xxxx Xxxxx repairing crab pots in the crab house. Photograph by author.
For bioregional thinker Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xx., buildings like the crab house key the ingredients of a particular place’s life giving force, engender- ing various forms of cultural affirmation that
lective ethos where problems are deliberated and lives of hard work celebrated. Not unlike Xxxxx Xxxxxxx’x observations of the Irish household and its working landscape, the social life of Xxxxxxxx’x crab house becomes “an epitome of connectivity” (Glassie 1982: 472), the setting where the collec- tive reach of his work finds poetic affirmation in words and deeds. On a winter day, with the crab house sealed tight and the wood stove burning, Xxxxxxxx’x friend and fellow bayman, Xxx Xxxxxx, prepares clams for duck hunters to eat when they return from a day on Great Bay (Fig. 40). The building centres his thoughts when he says: “I just love coming here because it draws me here, because there is something in my heart.” He is talking with Xxxx Xxxxx, who has been a regular visitor to the crab house for over thirty years where he moors his boat and helps Xxxxxxxx maintain his crab pots (Fig. 41). Moved by the building’s context, Xxxxxx goes on, intently reflecting on his decision to work the water and the meaning he derives from it:
I chose to be a bayman. I owned my own boat when I was twelve for clamming. I was a clammer when I was twelve…it is in your system, it is in your soul, in your mind, it’s Biblical, really a lot of meaning behind a lot of things....
He continues:
Xxxx and I say a lot of things here [at the crab house] sometimes, one of the greatest is, when he tells me, he says ‘After everything I have done in life, I don’t regret anything, I wouldn’t change what I have done’ and in my life I have been beat up, poor, and I work hard, really work hard, but I wouldn’t change a minute of it, I just wouldn’t [his emphasis]. People don’t understand I know people, they think,
how can I leave when it is zero degrees and clam all my life and be on that water, I just have [his emphasis]. I have seen things that nobody else ever has. I have lived things. I have been launched off the boat probably half a dozen times and I have been in the water, and survived, and the good Lord has taken care of me every single time, to me, that means whole lot. (Xxx Xxxxxx, personal communication, December 26, 2018)
During this encounter, Xxxxxx and Xxxxx talk of boyhood days they shared living “in the inlet,” the area of northern Atlantic City where Gardner’s Basin is located and where the city’s commercial fishing fleet was based, as well as some of its most popular recreational fishing amenities. Xxxxx recalls going underneath the docks and buildings (supported by pilings) at Captain Xxxxx’x (the locale’s principal restaurant and recreational fishing centre) and would “catch bait all underneath the building ... all the bait that would go overboard, scooping up all the bait and the little bluefish eating, jumping around eating the bait and the clam shells would be down there
... I would work at the Atlantic City Tuna Club as a kid ... and used to carry five gallon buckets of chum (ground up fish bait) to the recreational fishing boats” (Xxxx Xxxxx, personal communica- tion, December 26, 2018).
The tone turns reverent as Xxxxxx recounts early lessons he learned as boy from his grand- father, a scalloper who worked out of Xxxxxxx’x Basin. Hardly concealing sentiment shaped by his years of working the water, Xxxxxx reminds me that “the bay is a wonderful experience, and if you have never lived it, experienced it, it is very hard to explain it to somebody about what it means to you” (Xxx Xxxxxx, personal communication, December 26, 2018). Not unlike Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxxx’ assertions regarding memory in Appalachia’s “homeplaces,” Xxxxxx’x “narrative form has the ability to give expression to these intangible aspects” of the crab house, its relationship to Great Bay, and, in his own thoughts and actions, to those places he values in the wider vernacular landscape (Xxxxxxxx 2004 [1991]: 20). Xxxxxx’x work and words converge in his quest to map a meaningful life on the water, substantiating Xxxx Xxxxx’x notion that:
landscapes are not just material objects, explicable by some chronology of events in combination with local climate and soil, but are presences that matter in human lives; they are experienced not only visu- ally and kinesthetically, but aesthetically and emotionally as well. (Ryden 2001: 41-42)
The reckonings Xxxxxx describes find resolution through the social life of the crab house. Empowering his voice, the building’s
narratives define its significance as a “storyscape” where “memory making” unfolds with decided purpose, a juncture of material life and oral culture where the bayman’s sense of place is affirmed and where a traditional occupation’s contribution to bioregional dialogue is expressed (Xxxxxxx 2009: 38-74; Page 2016: 29-30). Those whose livelihoods rely on the harvesting of commonly-held marine resources are always awash in shifting ecological contexts, changing stock assessments (both official and unofficial), and contested sentiment over how such resources should be managed—from the number of crab pots placed in the water to a duck hunter’s bag limit. These challenges require talk—sometimes affirming and harmonious and at other times debated and conflicted. Places like the crab house have consistently provided an expressive venue to not only deliberate or reinforce the historical and contemporary claims of their users, but, in an era of more reflexive folklore practice, should be recognized as vital locations for fieldwork exchanges and “shared authority” that might better advance the sustainable use of natural resources (Borland 1998: 320-32; Frisch 1990;
Xxxxxxxx 1988: 21-54; Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx 1986). Today, recognition of the value of traditional ecological knowledge in natural resource man- agement calls for a realignment of our inquiry into the crab house to see how its multiple uses and expressive dynamics have applications in these areas and broader public discourse; in short, this built environment offers pos- sibilities for the application of public folklore.5 As previously discussed, an earlier cohort of writers, documentarians, artists, and government reporters had such ideas in mind when they put the social and working life of buildings, like the crab house, squarely at the centre of their cultural commentary and scientific investigations. The Xxxxxxxx crab house rekindles this tradition of appreciating the broadly applied lessons of vernacular landscape, of examining how build- ings translate environmental experience and then communicate it—indeed, give it resonance and relevance—to overlapping communities who value enduring connections to the estuarine environment. Xxxx Xxxxxxx brought focus to these possibilities when she identified the bay- man’s vernacular landscape as a material and oral interpretation of environmental experience, an
inextricable nexus of expressive folk genres that put the crab house at the centre of a traditional occupation’s use of marine resources (Hufford 1987: 13-41). Xxxxxxx’x insights, along with Xxx Xxxxxx’x and Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx’x observations of Utah’s ranching landscapes, unveiled the often unseen environmental ethic that drives the creation of these sites, a turn toward using the desire and restraint embodied in these places as source material for environmental planning and cultural conservation (Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxxxx 1988). Such documentary thinking inserts the crab house into wider community service, its capacity to prompt spatial memory bringing forth the acute observation and versatility needed to ensure occupational survival and its broader social dividend.
For Xxxxxxxx, during his years of more in- tensive soft-shell crabbing, this meant capitalizing on the “big shed” when crabs emerge from their dormant stage in the spring and simultaneously molt in greatest number. The value of soft-shell crabs heightened the urgency of the tools and knowledge he brought to bear on their harvest. As Xxxxxxx Xxxxx notes, Xxxxxxxx’x tools—his building, his boat, his crab pots, the entirety of his working landscape—become an “extension” of himself that serve to express his “history of past work ... history ... turned into bodily practice” that, as we have discussed, “is unconsciously observed, imitated, adopted, and passed on in a given community” (White 1996: 179). The maneuverability of his T-Craft boat became vital in tending crab pots that were closely placed during the shedder/peeler run (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, August 16, 2019). Beyond rote harvesting, Xxxxxxxx notes that a critical environmental reading informed the use of his tools:
The first peeler run is the big run of the whole season. Almost every crab is involved. Either a big male carrying a female that he’s going to mate with and she’s going to be a shedder. But the first run is predominantly immature females who are becoming sexually mature and it will be the last time they shed their shell in their life.
But in the springtime, males are worth a lot more money, because they’re scarce. So,
Fig. 42
Xxxx Xxxxxxxx tending shedder tanks.
Photograph by author.
we want to sell them, but, at the same time they’re worth their weight in gold, because during that first shed we use the male crabs as bait. We put the male crabs, we call them Xxxxx crabs, in the pots and all those females who are becoming sexually mature, which are overwhelming in that first peeler run, are looking for a male to mate with. I have pulled up pots with two or three male crabs and have 200 perfect female shedders.
So, the first shed is the big shed, the first peeler run. Everybody thinks that it hap- pens on the full moon, but it could happen on any moon. It is a bunch of conditions that have to be right at the same time, a lot of it has to do with water temperature, you need water around sixty degrees. (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019)
Taking us from the crabbing grounds back to the crab house, Xxxxxxxx describes the process of shedding out crabs in the building’s tanks or floats:
Say we would have three or four tanks going. One tank will be only for the crabs whose shells are starting to break open. So, when we look through the other tanks, we look for the one’s where the shell is starting to break open. And if you don’t get them out of there, the mother crabs will xxxx at that soft skin, and if they pierce it, the crabs will bleed out and will never shed right. So, when you see a crab where the shell is starting to crack open, you got to get it
out of there. Soft shell crabs are worth a lot more than any other crab. But there is also a lot of gamble with that. There’s mortality. If you put 500 peelers in one float [shedder tank], you are not necessarily going to get 500 soft shell crabs. If you get 300, you’re doing well. (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019)
As our fieldwork exchange unfolds, Xxxxxxxx guides me the full round of his working landscape, and, taking pause, reflects further on the handling of a marine resource that factors so prominently in the region’s identity from its harvesting to its consumption at dinner tables:
During that first shed, that first peeler run, I would spend probably twenty hours a day here, and I would have someone come in here at night, and I would run home, get a shower, maybe sleep for a couple of hours. But I always had a cot here. Still have one upstairs, sometimes I sleep here. I never left here. I’d be right up again at sunrise trying to catch more peelers. (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, March 16, 2019) (Fig. 42).
Xxxx Xxxxxxxx’x crab house maps his oc- cupation’s broad sweep into community life, and reveals deliberation and versatility that, according to Xxxx Xxxxx, are central for “people who are both in and of the landscape, whose worldview is predicated not on exploitation and destruction of nature, but on understanding, respect and pres- ervation.” These traits are tested in “the mirror that nature provides,” imparting insights that the building’s occupants and wider society can use to craft an equitable convergence of environmental planning and cultural conservation (Ryden 2001: 50). Memories curated within the confines of the crab house sharpen our perspective on how certain spaces are valued, and reveal experiences that blur the boundaries between artifice and na- ture. As much as the observer might be moved by the crab house’s capacity to convey occupational integrity—a building that encodes the immutable calling a bayman feels for the water—it is also equally relevant to see it orienting options and decision-making that hinge on nature’s rhythms and more profound ecological change. This prospect acknowledges the seamless experience embedded in the vernacular landscape; in
this case, one where the xxxxxx’x actions and expressive behaviour synchronize the palpable biological rhythms of the estuarine environment. It is an enterprise well-suited for folklorists who see the vernacular landscape’s vibrancy tethered to the necessary integration of material life and oral expression.
Epitomizing the dynamics behind such landscape experience, Xxx Xxxxxx takes pride in describing how he has “eeled, minnowed, scalloped, clammed, crabbed ... I can spurt them [digging clams], seine them [fin fish], Xxxxxxxxxx rake them [clams], wade them [clams] ... I have learned how to do this, that is how you live… there is not one thing I can’t do ... you have to be flexible, capable of change” (Xxx Xxxxxx, personal communication, December 26, 2018).
His commentary is but one contribution to quandaries evoked by the crab house’s social scene. These can range from concerns over the sustainability of dredging crabs in winter to not shooting at a flock of sixty ducks while hunting in hope they will return at a later time; it is an action accompanied by the waterfowlers refrain at the site: “Do you want to eat for one day or for the year?” Influenced by a place that is in the “heart,” in the “soul,” Xxxxxx further reflects on his environmental experience and his evaluations of the effects of toxic run-off and natural disasters in Great Bay, saying:
I have more knowledge out here about the minnows, crabs, and what happens to the ecosystem. I was the first to raise clams under nets on Great Bay. When we first started we didn’t need screens to cover the clams because the bat-rays, the cow-nose rays didn’t know the clams were in here. They used to come in once in awhile, one or two, and hit you [clam farms]. But now, after Hurricane Sandy and just before, there is no food left in the ocean. (Xxx Xxxxxx, personal communication, December 26, 2018)
A forum for eliciting life history, Xxxxxxxx’x crab house can take environmental experience and its discourse, and insert it into ethical—in- deed, honourable—constructive partnership with cultural conservation. It galvanizes forward- looking options for using marine resources in culturally and ecologically sustainable ways, balanced options that can potentially address
Xxxxxxx Xxxxx’x concerns with “condemning all work in nature and sentimentalizing vanishing forms of work” or “replacing a romanticism of inviolate nature with a romanticism of local work” (1996: 181).
Resonating with feeling and affective depth, the Xxxxxxxx crab house blurs the lines between being curated—a place maintained for everyday use—and, at the same time, serving as curator—a place where occupational memory ensures that environmental and social relationships are not compromised by the transactional necessities of modern economic life. Behind these relation- ships are the disciplined desires of the bayman, a calling not solely gauged in the daily economic contingencies that xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx’x life, but one which honors an equilibrium premised on reconciling nature’s inexorable force with the realities of the material world. Acknowledging this outlook, Xxxxxxxx remarks:
When I first started doing this, there was this old man that worked on the bay. I always remembered what he told me, be- cause it’s the truth. ‘Some years you think
you’re going to get rich and you never do, and some years you think you’re going to starve and you never do’” (Xxxxxx 2010).
The crab house embodies this measured tem- perament, keeping the past inscribed in its fabric, epitomizing, in Xxxx Xxxxxx’x words, those earthly forces that bestow on buildings the “sublimity of the rents, or fractures, or stains, or vegetation, which assimilate the architecture with the work of Nature” and those human desires that make it “stand as long as human work at its strongest can be hoped to stand” (Xxxxxx 1981:172,183).
Cognizant of how his building, in a Ruskinian sense, “manages and mitigates” its sublime context (Spuybroek 2017: 189), Xxxxxxxx is equally aware that this engagement with nature, combined with the building’s “cultural weather- ing”—the human experience inscribed in its years of use—projects the reach of his work throughout the community and region (Heath 2001: xviii-xix, 182-86). Humourously musing, but also taking seriously the occupational tradition his building represents, he recalls repairs he needed to make to his roof:
The roof on the original part was cedar shakes, and for years you could see
daylight through it…as soon as it rained it swelled up and never leaked a drop. But finally, it started to leak and I had to take that roof off and I had a regular roof put on, plywood and shingles, and, man, I took a lot of heat from people [artists] who would paint the building, I really did, and they stopped down, ‘why did you do that,’ and I said ‘its leaking’ [mildly laughing]. (Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, personal communication, January 15, 2019) (Fig. 43)
Imparting obligation, his tempered handling of the building over time—never abrupt or sweeping in its changes—is a learned response to nature’s rhythms and recognition of the enduring utility of form and fabric (Glassie 2000: 29). For Xxxxxx, such considerations spoke to architec- ture’s unshakeable power in shaping memory, “we cannot remember without her” (1981: 169). Taking his cue from this sentiment, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx asserts that vernacular architecture “gives physi- cal form to claims and names, to memories and hopes” (2000: 22). The Xxxxxxxx crab house sits at the inextricable juncture of experience and memory, a place whose lessons, according to Xxxx Xxxxx, can convey “environmental knowledge
gained through work rather than through leisure or literature ... a sort of environmental wisdom and responsibility, yet one that does not bring with it a corresponding desire to sweep working people off the landscape completely” (2001: 75). This sentiment continues to be as relevant now as it was over fifty years ago when Xxxxx Xxxxxxx began placing vernacular architecture at the centre of the folklorist’s quest to interpret how people meaningfully live and work in certain environments. Xxxxxxx steered a course not only intent on unravelling meaning in the vernacular landscape, but, like Xxxxxx, one offering com- mentary on the enduring relevance of these built environments in contemporary society. Central to the folklorist’s enterprise is the task of seeing how the vernacular landscape is inherited and used by its immediate users, and, as their lives become inscribed in it, show its continuing role in culturally orienting a community’s valued endeavours. These historical patterns undergird the vernacular landscape’s grip on folkloristic inquiry, our exploration into seeing ordinary buildings as a functional and social gauge of ethical—indeed, hopefully sustainable—relations with the natural world.
Fig. 43
One of many paintings of the Xxxxxxxx crab house done by local artists. Watercolor painting by
V. Xxx Xxxxxxxx. Collection of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx.
Notes
1. The box-shaped crab pot is the signature harvesting/entrapment gear used by crabbers in the Middle Atlantic and Chesapeake regions. Whether on boats being set or repaired or stored at the crab fishing sites, it is a defining feature of the blue-claw crab fishery’s vernacular landscape. Invented by Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxx of Northumberland Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx in the 1920s, it made its way to Southern New Jersey in the 1950s, and gradually replaced trotlines as the harvesting tool of choice among the region’s crabbers. See Xxxxxxxx (1990: 251-55) for more on Xxxxx and his development of the crab pot.
2. For more on folkloristic examination of the con- nections linking traditional ecological knowl- edge and the crafting of vernacular architecture and the wider vernacular landscape, see Glassie (1982: 315-495). Building on this line of thinking as it concerns the folkloristic handling of a mari- time setting’s vernacular landscape, particularly its focus on how buildings simultaneously serve social order and community response to marine ecology, see Xxxxxx (1991). Further insight on how buildings and cultural landscapes archive ecological memory and orient the use of natural resources in a marine environment can be found in Mellin (2003).
3. See Xxxxx (2012: 121) for commentary on how work is dignified by the commingling of mind, endurance, and environment—oftentimes in the most arduous of contexts.
4. Xxxxxx’x work (2003) is useful for folklorists seeking a bioregional framework that can inform new interpretive frameworks for understanding the connections between vernacular landscapes and their environmental settings. Regarding performance in architectural settings, see Xxxxx (1988 [1980]). For more on the relevance of buildings and landscapes as performative venues for the expression of history and culture, see Glassie (1982: 11-156, 323-495). See also Xxxxxxxxx (1997), for more on how material culture in the area around Great Bay historically affirms the connections between people, work, place, and the natural environment.
5. See Xxxxxxx (2011) for an exemplary study of building types similar to the Xxxxxxxx crab house, one that offers a folklorist’s perspective on their cultural significance and the ap- plication of these insights in furthering their historic preservation. This work also signifies the important interface between folkloristic handling of vernacular architecture and relevant environmental discourse on marshlands and marine resources. Broader movement in this direction among folklorists is presented in Xxxxxxx (2019). For more on how folklorists can foster an integration of vernacular landscape study and traditional ecological knowledge in natural resource management schemes see, Neis et al. (1999) and Nazarea (1999).
Add Americana: The Decoy. 1932. Fortune, August, 38-42.
References
Xxxxxx, Xxxxx (Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx). 1985 [1937] Cape Cod Pilot. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxx X. 1939. ‘Long Shore. New York: The Derrydale Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxx. 1954 [1934]. Wild Fowl Decoys. New York: Dover Publications.
Xxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx. 1937. More Forgotten Towns of Southern New Jersey. New York: E.P. Xxxxxx and Company.
———. 1945. Jersey Genesis: The Story of the Mullica River. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 1997. In Search of Authenticity: The Formation of Folklore Studies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx. 1998 [1991]. ‘That’s not what I said’: Interpretive Conflict in Oral Narrative Research. In The Oral History Reader, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, 320-32. New York: Routledge.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx. 1988. The Grouse Creek Cultural Survey: Integrating Folklife and Historic Preservation Field Research. Washington, D.C.: American Folklife Center/ Library of Congress.
Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx X. 1997. Affirmed Objects in Affirmed Places: History, Geographic Sentiment, and a Region’s Crafts. Journal of Design History 10: 399-415.
———. 2019. Portraying the Working Landscape: Photography and the Shaping of the Delaware Bay’s Environmental Identity. Paper presented at the American Society for Environmental History Annual Conference, 10-14 April, Columbus, Ohio.
Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx X. 1990. Harvesting the Chesapeake: Tools and Traditions. Centreville, MD: Tidewater Publishers.
Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxx. 2013. Xxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxx of Xxxxxxxxxx, New Jersey: The Artist and the
Entrepreneur. Charleston, SC: The History Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx X. 2008. Rocky Neck Art Colony, 1850-1950, Gloucester, Massachusetts. Gloucester, MA: Rocky Neck Art Colony, Inc.
Xxxxx, Xxxxx. 1995. Jungle Fever. The New Yorker, 6 November, 118-29.
Xxxx, Xxxxx. 2010. Location, Occupation, Juxtaposition, Interpenetration: Notes on an Erotics of the Mining City. Buildings and Landscapes 17 (1): 1-12.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx X. 1993. Revolt of the Provinces: The Regionalist Movement in America, 1920-1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2007. Ipswich Days: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx And His Hometown. Andover, MA: Addison Gallery of American Art, Phillips Academy.
Xxxxx, Xxxx. 2012. The Republic of Nature: An Environmental History of the United States. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxx. 1988. Lord I’m Coming Home: Everyday Aesthetics in Tidewater North Carolina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. 1990. A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2009. Captain Xxxx Xxxxxxxx. 27th Annual Ocean County Decoy and Gunning Show Program, September 26-27.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx. 1982. Passing the Time in Ballymenone: Culture and History of an Ulster Community. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
———. 1988 [1977]. Meaningful Things and Appropriate Myths: The Artifact’s Place in American Studies. In Material Life in America, 1600-1860, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxx St. Xxxxxx, 63-92. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
———. 2000. Vernacular Architecture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 1993. A Certain Slant of Light: Marines and Seascapes by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx. Pleasantville, NJ: The Noyes Museum and The Philadelphia Maritime Museum.
Heath, Kingston Wm. 2001. The Patina of Place: The Cultural Weathering of a New England Industrial Landscape. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxx. 1986. One Space, Many Places: Folklife and Land Use in New Jersey’s Pinelands National Reserve, Report and Recommendations to the New Jersey Pinelands Commission for Cultural Conservation in the Pinelands National Reserve.
Washington, D.C.: American Folklife Center/ Library of Congress.
———. 1987. Telling the Landscape: Folklife Expressions and Sense of Place. In Pinelands Folklife, ed. Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, 13-41. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Xxxxx, Xxxx. 1988 [1980]. Ethnographic Method in History: An Action Approach. In Material Life in America, 1600-1860, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxx St. Xxxxxx, 39-61. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Xxxxxxx, Xxx. 2009. Place, Race, and Story: Essays on the Past and Future of Historic Preservation. New York: Routledge.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx. 2004. Xxxx Xxxxxxx and the Earth: A Study in Ecopoetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxx X. 2001. The Cos Cob Art Colony: Impressionists on the Connecticut Shore. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx X. and Xxxxxxx X. X. Xxxxxxx. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
XxXxxx, Xxxx. 1968. The Pine Barrens. New York: Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx and Giroux.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2003. Tilting: House Launching, Slide Hauling, Potato Trenching, and Other Tales from a Newfoundland Fishing Village. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx D. ed. 1999. Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Xxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx F. Xxxx, Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx. 1991. An Interdisciplinary Method for Collecting and Integrating Fishers’ Ecological Knowledge into Resource Management. In Fishing Places, Fishing People: Traditions and Issues in Canadian Small- Scale Fisheries, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx
X. Xxxxx, 217-238. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Xxxx, Xxx. 2016. Why Preservation Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Xxxxx, Xxxxxx X. 2000. Biologists and the Promise of American Life: From Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx to Xxxxxx Xxxxxx. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Xxxxxxxx, Xxx. 2013. Jersey Shore Impressionists: The Fascination of Sun and Sea, 1880-1940. West Creek, NJ: Down the Shore Publishing.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 1991. A Place to Belong: Community Order and Everyday Space in Calvert, Newfoundland. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Xxxxxxxxxx, X.X. 1931. Xxxxxxxx Ways. New York: The Century Company.
Xxxxxx, Xxxx. 1981. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. New York: Xxxxxx, Straus and Giroux.
Xxxxx, Xxxx X. 2001. Landscape with Figures: Nature and Culture in New England. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx June. 1903. Bayside’s Mayor. The Philadelphia Record. 25 April.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx. 2011. On the Bay: Bay Houses and Maritime Culture on Long Island’s
Marshlands. 2nd ed. Port Washington, NY: Long Island Traditions.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxx. 2019. Folklore and Historic Preservation: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of American Folklore 132: 359-89.
Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxx. 2017. The Sympathy of Things: Xxxxxx and the Ecology of Design. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxx. 1994. Alongshore. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx X, Xx. 2003. LifePlace: Bioregional Thought and Practice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1930. Department of Commerce, Fifteenth Census of the United States, Population Schedule, New Jersey, Camden City, Camden County, Sheet Number, 11-B.
Xxxxxx, Xxxxx. 2010. Softshell Crabbing Can Be A Hard Life For Xxxxxxxx Man. Press of Atlantic City, 6 June. https:///pressofatlanticcity. com/softshell-crabbing-can-be-a-hard...-for- xxxxxxxx-man/article_4fc6119e-7183-11df-83- ed-001cc4c03286.html (accessed September 27, 2019).
Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx. 1940. Down Jersey: Folks and Their Jobs, Pine Barrens, Salt Marsh and Sea Islands. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company.
Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx. 1996. ‘Are You an Environmentalist or Do You Work for a Living?’: Work and Nature. In Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, ed.
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, 171-185. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Xxxxxxx, Xxxx. 1907. Complete Prose Works: Specimen Days and Collect, November Boughs and Good Bye My Fancy. Boston: Small, Xxxxxxx and Company.
———. 1992. Leaves of Grass. New York: Vintage Books/Library of America.
Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxx. 2004 [1991]. Homeplace: The Social Use and Meaning of the Folk Dwelling in Southwestern North Carolina. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.