Accountability for Performance Sample Clauses

Accountability for Performance. Xxx Health recognises that some practices may wish to work together, and will encourage and support collaborative working; however, accountability for the delivery of this agreement will remain with the individual practice named. The Practice leads for the delivery of this agreement are: GP Clinical Representative:……………………………………. Practice Manager :…………………………………….. GP lead for Referral review:……………………………………. GP Prescribing Lead :……………………………………. LCGs will be responsible for managing the practice delivery agreement and the structure of the associated PDMA scheme. The LCG may if appropriate withhold or claw back funds for non-delivery of the agreement. In-year monitoring will take place with evidence gathered through a variety of sources to minimise the administrative burden e.g. quarterly returns and practices visits, participation in Cam Health work streams. Should either party fail to deliver the requirements of this agreement, discussions will take place between practice and LCG and remedial actions agreed where and if appropriate.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Accountability for Performance. In general terms accountability is a concept which deals with people (individual and group as well) and it is intended as the liability for ensuring that an obligation (or responsibility) to perform a task is fulfilled. As used in this handbook, accountability is a results-oriented procedure which only looks at the outcomes established for improving the performances; never to place blame and deliver punishment. This said, the VERYSchool accountability environment refers to the condition in which Individuals, Teams and Consortium Members are getting organized to be: - motivated to execute their authority and/or fulfill their responsibility; - stimulated to perform their work and to achieve the desired results; - inspired to share their results; and - willing to accept the liability for those results. The whole VERYSchool Consortium recognizes that key requirements for the successful establishment of an accountability environment, from whom the project development getting benefits, are: • Leadership • Transparency • Consequences • Reciprocation • Clarity • Consistency • Equity • Balance • Follow-Up • Trust • Ownership All these concepts are merged and converge in the VERYSchool Performance Management System as mutual relationship between Authority and Responsibility. Authority is assigned as the right to act without prior approval from the General Assembly to meet in a workmanlike the contents of the DoW. Then: - the General Assembly has the authority for strategic revisions of project plan and outcomes, - the project Coordinator has the authority to drive the project development strictly observant of scheduling, timing and quality, and to take fast decisions to manage emergencies without approval of the GA. - WP- and Task-Leaders have the authority to drive in effective manner the assigned work. Responsibility is delegated to each person to do the work with duly diligence according to the roles they have in the project. In any case, assigned authority and/or delegated responsibility, within the Plan-Do- Check-Act Performance management is the basic framework to provide feedback for improvements and to maintain standards of high quality.
Sample 1

Related to Accountability for Performance

  • Accountability 5.3.1 Actuaries and external auditors will be appointed by the Trust. Audited financial statements, and an actuarial evaluation report will be obtained for the Trust on an annual basis. The actuarial report will include projections regarding the adequacy of contributions to cover projected benefit and related costs for the Trust for a period of not less than 3 years into the future.

  • Financial Accountability 6.1 The Recipient must ensure that the requirements set out in this Agreement, and in any clarification or guidance issued from time to time by the Authority, are complied with. In particular the Recipient shall:

  • Security for Performance In the event that Exhibit A Section 4 indicates the need for Consultant to provide additional security for performance of its duties under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional security prior to commencement of its Required Services in the form and on the terms prescribed on Exhibit A, or as otherwise prescribed by the City Attorney.

  • Service Accountability Agreements The HSP acknowledges that if the LHIN and the HSP enter into negotiations for a subsequent service accountability agreement, subsequent funding may be interrupted if the next service accountability agreement is not executed on or before the expiration date of this Agreement.

  • A Service Accountability Agreement This Agreement is a service accountability agreement for the purposes of section 20(1) of LHSIA.

  • Time for Performance 1.1. The term of this SOW Agreement shall begin on and end on (the “Initial Term”). The Initial Term may be extended as the parties may agree. The State may terminate this SOW for convenience upon thirty days prior written notice to the Contractor. If the Master Agreement should expire or otherwise terminate prior to the end of the term of this SOW Agreement, this SOW Agreement shall continue to the end of its existing term, unless or until terminated in accordance with the terms of this SOW Agreement, and the Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms of the Master Agreement shall survive and apply to this SOW Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.