Adversary Sample Clauses

Adversary. The adversary is a very powerful agent with powerful computing resources. It is able to move about freely in the deployment space to monitor transmissions, replay messages and insert its own fabricated messages. It is also able to physically capture nodes and extract all the keying material, including the public key IDs, the private key sets S and the keying parameters from ROM and RAM memory.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Adversary. The adversary is neither a client, nor the server, and in our formalization it is given enormous capabilities to closely model its abilities in the real life: the adversary can tap on the wire to eavesdrop, delete, delay, insert, replay, modify messages. We model these capabilities through the following queries: – The adversary has the ability to send arbitrary messages to the base station S us- ing the SendServer-query. This query on input a message m returns the message that S would have produced in processing the message. If the message is not a valid one, the query returns a special symbol ⊥. The queries SendServer(setup, J ), SendServer(join, J ) and SendServer(remove, J ) return the flows output by the base station when initiating a Setup(J ), Xxxx(J ) and Xxxxxx(J ) resp. depending on the scheme. A ⊥ – The adversary has the ability to send arbitrary messages to clients using a Send-query. This query on input a client U and a message m returns the message U would have produced in processing the message. If the message is not a valid one, a special symbol is returned. The queries Send(U, setup, ), Send(U, join, ) and Send(U, remove, ), respectively, return the flows output by the client U when initiating a Setup( ), Join( ) and Remove( ), respectively, depending on the scheme. A – Known-key attacks are modeled by the Reveal-query. This query allows the adversary to learn the value of a particular session key sk, if of course the attacked player (client or server) has already computed the key. This query on input a player returns sk to the adversary but not the player internal state. A – Forward-secrecy is modeled through the Corrupt-query. This query allows to learn the value of long-lived keys. This query on input a player returns to the adversary the value of the long-lived keys. Forward-secrecy means that loss of a LL-key does not compromise the semantic security of previously-distributed session keys. The adversary has, unlike in the wired environment, true and full control over the commu- nication medium. The adversary can cut off mobiles, modify the mobile network topology and make mobiles disappear and reappear continuously. The adversary’s abilities to modify the net- work topology are modeled through the Send and SendServer queries, initiating setup, remove or join.
Sample 1
Adversary. Adversary A 1 does not have access to the master key, but A 1 can replace the public keys of any entity with a value of his choice, since there is no certificate involved in CLPKC.
Sample 1

Related to Adversary

  • Pending Litigation Financial position and prospective long-term profitability of the Single Tenderer, and in the case the Tenderer is a JV, of each member of the JV, shall remain sound according to criteria established with respect to Financial Capability under paragraph I (i) above assuming that all pending litigation will be resolved against the Tenderer. Tenderer shall provide information on pending litigations as per Form CON-2.

  • Arbitration Proceedings Arbitration between the parties will be subject to the following:

  • Litigation There is no action, suit, inquiry, notice of violation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company, any Subsidiary or any of their respective properties before or by any court, arbitrator, governmental or administrative agency or regulatory authority (federal, state, county, local or foreign) (collectively, an “Action”) which (i) adversely affects or challenges the legality, validity or enforceability of any of the Transaction Documents or the Securities or (ii) could, if there were an unfavorable decision, have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary, nor any director or officer thereof, is or has been the subject of any Action involving a claim of violation of or liability under federal or state securities laws or a claim of breach of fiduciary duty. There has not been, and to the knowledge of the Company, there is not pending or contemplated, any investigation by the Commission involving the Company or any current or former director or officer of the Company. The Commission has not issued any stop order or other order suspending the effectiveness of any registration statement filed by the Company or any Subsidiary under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act.

  • Alternative Arbitration Proceedings Alternatively, the Parties may refer the matter to the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) which offers a neutral venue for the conduct of national and international arbitration with commitment to providing institutional support to the arbitral process.

  • Alternative to Litigation 13.2.1 The Parties desire to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement without litigation. Accordingly, the Parties agree to use the following Dispute Resolution procedures with respect to any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its breach.

  • Litigation and Claims No litigation, claim, investigation, administrative proceeding or similar action (including those for unpaid taxes) against Borrower is pending or threatened, and no other event has occurred which may materially adversely affect Borrower’s financial condition or properties, other than litigation, claims, or other events, if any, that have been disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender in writing.

  • Pending Proceedings Borrower is not in default under any law or regulation or under any order of any court, board, commission or agency whatsoever, and there are no claims, actions, suits or proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of Borrower, threatened against or affecting Borrower or the Development, at law or in equity, before or by any court, board, commission or agency whatsoever which might, if determined adversely to Borrower, materially affect Borrower's ability to repay the Loan or impair the security to be given to the County pursuant hereto.

  • Legal Action If you are dissatisfied with the determination of your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law. Under state law, you may not begin court proceedings prior to the expiration of sixty (60) days after the date you filed your claim. In no event may legal action be taken against us later than three (3) years from the date you were required to file the claim. For members covered by a group (employer sponsored) health plan, your plan may be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended. Under federal law, if your plan is subject to ERISA you may have the right to bring legal action under section 502(a) of ERISA after you have exhausted all appeals available under the plan. That means, for both medical and administrative appeals, federal law requires that you pursue a final decision from the plan, prior to filing suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. For a medical appeal, that final decision is the determination of the appeal. You are not required to submit your claim to external review prior to filing a suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. Consult your employer to determine whether this applies to you and what your rights and obligations may be. If you are dissatisfied with the decision on your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law.

  • Court Proceedings Subject to the terms of this Agreement, First Majestic will cooperate with and assist Silvermex in seeking the Interim Order and the Final Order, including by providing Silvermex on a timely basis any information reasonably required to be supplied by First Majestic in connection therewith. Silvermex will provide legal counsel to First Majestic with reasonable opportunity to review and comment upon drafts of all material to be filed with the Court in connection with the Arrangement, and will give reasonable consideration to all such comments. Subject to applicable Law, Silvermex will not file any material with the Court in connection with the Arrangement or serve any such material, and will not agree to modify or amend materials so filed or served, except as contemplated by this Section 2.6 or with First Majestic’s prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require First Majestic to agree or consent to any increase in consideration or other modification or amendment to such filed or served materials that expands or increases First Majestic’s obligations set forth in any such filed or served materials or under this Agreement or the Arrangement. Silvermex shall also provide to First Majestic’s legal counsel on a timely basis copies of any notice of appearance or other Court documents served on Silvermex in respect of the application for the Interim Order or the Final Order or any appeal therefrom and of any notice, whether written or oral, received by Silvermex indicating any intention to oppose the granting of the Interim Order or the Final Order or to appeal the Interim Order or the Final Order. Silvermex will ensure that all materials filed with the Court in connection with the Arrangement are consistent in all material respects with the terms of this Agreement and the Plan of Arrangement. In addition, Silvermex will not object to legal counsel to First Majestic making such submissions on the hearing of the motion for the Interim Order and the application for the Final Order as such counsel considers appropriate; provided, however, that Silvermex is advised of the nature of any submissions prior to the hearing and such submissions are consistent with this Agreement and the Plan of Arrangement. Silvermex will also oppose any proposal from any party that the Final Order contain any provision inconsistent with this Agreement, and, if at any time after the issuance of the Final Order and prior to the Effective Date, Silvermex is required by the terms of the Final Order or by Law to return to Court with respect to the Final Order, it shall do so after notice to, and in consultation and cooperation with, First Majestic.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.