Common use of Assignment of Weights Clause in Contracts

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 18, Round 3 or for Panel 19, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 such families for Panel 18, Round 3 and 7,290 for Panel 19, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 Panel 19 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributions.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1810, Round 3 or for Panel 1911, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2006 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 3.3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families persons with familyperson-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 6,405 such families for Panel 1810, Round 3 and 7,290 7,417 for Panel 1911, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 13,822 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these "family" units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 128,088,390 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 13,822 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. 3.3 Families with a family weight for the 2014 2006 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 10 Panel 19 11 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 6,405 7,417 13,822 128,088,390 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributionsrecently due to an adjustment in the 2003 CPS estimates.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1811, Round 3 or for Panel 1912, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2007 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 3.3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families persons with familyperson-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 6,680 such families for Panel 1811, Round 3 and 7,290 5,736 for Panel 1912, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 12,416 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these "family" units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 129,215,973.78 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 12,416 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. 3.3 Families with a family weight for the 2014 2007 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 11 Panel 19 12 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 6,680 5,736 12,416 129,215,974 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributionsrecently due to an adjustment in the 2003 CPS estimates.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1814, Round 3 or for Panel 1915, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2010 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 6,715 such families for Panel 1814, Round 3 and 7,290 6,644 for Panel 1915, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 13,359 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 132,865,347 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 13,359 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2010 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 14 Panel 19 15 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 6,715 6,644 13,359 132,865,347 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributionsdue to an adjustment in the 2003 CPS estimates.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1813, Round 3 or for Panel 1914, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2009 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 7,346 such families for Panel 1813, Round 3 and 7,290 7,488 for Panel 1914, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 14,834 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 131,223,210 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 14,834 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2009 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 13 Panel 19 14 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 7,346 7,488 14,834 131,223,210 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributionsdue to an adjustment in the 2003 CPS estimates.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1812, Round 3 or for Panel 1913, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2008 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 5,136 such families for Panel 1812, Round 3 and 7,290 7,821 for Panel 1913, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 12,957 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 130,610,298 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 12,957 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2008 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 12 Panel 19 13 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 5,136 7,821 12,957 130,610,298 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributionsdue to an adjustment in the 2003 CPS estimates.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 188, Round 3 or for Panel 199, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2004 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 3.3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families persons with familyperson-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 6,600 such families for Panel 188, Round 3 and 7,290 7,064 for Panel 199, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 13,664 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these "family" units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 124,832,233 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 13,664 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-33.3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2004 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 8 Panel 19 9 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 6,600 7,064 13,664 124,832,233 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributions.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1815, Round 3 or for Panel 1916, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2011 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 5,967 such families for Panel 1815, Round 3 and 7,290 8,149 for Panel 1916, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 14,116 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 133,803,893 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 14,116 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2011 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 15 Panel 19 16 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 5,967 8,149 14,116 133,803,893 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributionsdue to an adjustment in the 2003 CPS estimates.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 187, Round 3 or for Panel 198, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2003 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 3.3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families persons with familyperson-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 6,403 such families for Panel 187, Round 3 and 7,290 7,023 for Panel 198, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 13,426 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these "family" units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 123,860,517 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 13,426 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-33.3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2003 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 7 Panel 19 8 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 6,403 7,023 13,426 123,860,517 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributions.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1817, Round 3 or for Panel 1918, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2013 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 7,314 such families for Panel 1817, Round 3 and 7,290 7,508 for Panel 1918, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 14,822 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 138,154,576 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 14,822 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2013 Point-in-Time file Panel 17 Panel 18 Panel 19 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 7,314 7,508 14,822 138,154,576 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributions.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1816, Round 3 or for Panel 1917, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2012 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 7,671 such families for Panel 1816, Round 3 and 7,290 7,919 for Panel 1917, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 15,590 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 135,994,714 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 15,590 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2012 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 16 Panel 19 17 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 7,671 7,919 15,590 135,994,714 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributions.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 1819, Round 3 or for Panel 1920, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2015 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families with family-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 6,648 such families for Panel 1819, Round 3 and 7,290 8,069 for Panel 1920, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 14,717 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these “family” units (families plus single person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 140,602,816 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 14,717 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2015 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 19 Panel 19 20 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 6,648 8,069 14,717 140,602,816 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributions.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Assignment of Weights. If all key, in-scope members of a family responded to MEPS for their entire period of eligibility for Panel 186, Round 3 or for Panel 197, Round 1 and if the family had a key reference person, then that family received a family-level weight (WGTRU13>0). Reporting units consisting of an individual respondent who was both key and in-scope also received a family-level weight. These single individual person “family” units can be included or excluded from family-level analyses at the analyst’s discretion. Family-level weights were poststratified to figures obtained from the March 2014 2002 CPS. The family-level poststratification reflects reflected population distributions across family type (reference person married, spouse present; male reference person, no spouse present; female reference person, no spouse present), size of family, age of reference person, location of family (census region and MSA status), and race/ethnicity of the family’s reference person. Table 3-3 3.3 shows the number of families with family-level weights for each of the two panels separately, as well as the combined total and the total population estimate represented by the weighted total for all families persons with familyperson-level weights. Included as families in these counts are individuals living in one person RUs. There are 6,867 8,625 such families for Panel 186, Round 3 and 7,290 6,857 for Panel 197, Round 1. Thus, in total, there are 14,157 15,482 sample families in the file with positive family-level weights (WGTRU13>0). The population estimate of the number of these "family" units (families plus single individual person “family” units) with family-level weights containing at least one member of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population is 138,710,926 121,753,042 based on summing the family level weights across all 4,157 15,482 MEPS families where WGTRU13 is positive. Table 3-33.3. Families with a family weight for the 2014 2002 Point-in-Time file Panel 18 6 Panel 19 7 Combined Population estimate (weighted total of combined sample) Number 6,867 7,290 14,157 138,710,926 8,625 6,857 15,482 121,753,042 It should be noted that CPS and MEPS definitions of family units are slightly different. In particular, CPS does not include xxxxxx children in families or consider unmarried persons who live together as family units. Adjustments were made in the poststratification process to help compensate for some of these differences. Again, note that MEPS population estimates have undergone some “discontinuities” as discussed earlier, as they now reflect 2010 Census data on population distributions.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Data Use Agreement

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!