Common use of AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES Clause in Contracts

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Deputy Director Date Section II SPECIFIC RATINGS PLANS / SPECIFICATION ACCURACY EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A RESPONSIVENESS TO STAFF EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Plan/Specification clear and precise Timely Responses Plans/Specs Coordination Attitude toward Client and review bodies Plans/Specs properly formatted Follows direction and chain of responsibility Code Requirements covered Work product delivered on time Adherence to City Standard Drawings/Specs Timeliness in notifying City of major problems Drawings reflect existing conditions Resolution of Field problems As-Built Drawings CONSISTENCY WITH BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Quality Design Reasonable Agreement negotiation Change Orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Value Engineering Analysis

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Deputy Director Date Section II SPECIFIC RATINGS (4/91) TURN OVER Consultant Performance Evaluation 1 of 2 01-18-13 PLANS / SPECIFICATION ACCURACY EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A RESPONSIVENESS TO CITY STAFF EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Plan/Specification clear and precise Timely Responses Plans/Specs Coordination Attitude toward Client and review bodies Plans/Specs properly formatted Follows direction and chain of responsibility Code Requirements covered Work product delivered on time Adherence Adhered to City Standard Drawings/Specs Timeliness in notifying City of major problems Drawings reflect existing conditions Resolution of Field problems As-Built Drawings CONSISTENCY WITH BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Quality Design Reasonable Agreement negotiation Change Orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Value Engineering Analysis

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Deputy Director Date Section II SPECIFIC RATINGS (4/91) TURN OVER EXHIBIT F3 PLANS / SPECIFICATION ACCURACY EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A RESPONSIVENESS TO CITY STAFF EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Plan/Specification clear and precise Timely Responses Plans/Specs Coordination Attitude toward Client and review bodies Plans/Specs properly formatted Follows direction and chain of responsibility Code Requirements covered Work product delivered on time Adherence Adhered to City Standard Drawings/Specs Timeliness in notifying City of major problems Drawings reflect existing conditions Resolution of Field problems As-Built Drawings CONSISTENCY WITH BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Quality Design Reasonable Agreement negotiation Change Orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Value Engineering Analysis

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES. 7a. Project Manager Date 7b. Deputy Director Date Section II SPECIFIC RATINGS (4/91) TURN OVER PLANS / SPECIFICATION ACCURACY EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A RESPONSIVENESS TO CITY STAFF EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Plan/Specification clear and precise Timely Responses Plans/Specs Coordination Attitude toward Client and review bodies Plans/Specs properly formatted Follows direction and chain of responsibility Code Requirements covered Work product delivered on time Adherence Adhered to City Standard Drawings/Specs Timeliness in notifying City of major problems Drawings reflect existing conditions Resolution of Field problems As-Built Drawings CONSISTENCY WITH BUDGET EXCELLENT SATISFACTORY POOR N/A Quality Design Reasonable Agreement negotiation Change Orders due to design deficiencies are minimized Adherence to fee schedule Adherence to project budget Value Engineering Analysis