Common use of Billing Criteria for Complexes Clause in Contracts

Billing Criteria for Complexes. An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires involving multiple jurisdictions that are managed as an Incident Complex. Only costs that cannot be reasonably attributed to an individual fire will be assigned to the Complex code unless otherwise directed in an incident-specific cost apportionment agreement. Incident costs charged to the Complex will be allocated to individual fires based the percentage of effort involved in managing individual fires. The allocation method employed will be documented in the incident-specific cost apportionment agreement By default, when wildfires are assigned to a complex, costs for each fire within the complex will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above. By default, costs charged to the complex code will be allocated to individual fires prior to apportionment as follows: = + � ∗ Where: � (1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + ) = , ℎ ℎ = ℎ = ℎ =

Billing Criteria for Complexes. An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires involving multiple jurisdictions that are managed as an Incident Complex. Only costs that cannot be reasonably attributed to an individual fire will be assigned to the Complex code unless otherwise directed in an incident-specific cost apportionment agreement. Incident costs charged to the Complex will be allocated to individual fires based the percentage of effort involved in managing individual fires. The allocation method employed will be documented in the incident-specific cost apportionment agreement By default, when wildfires are assigned to a complex, costs for each fire within the complex will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above. By default, costs charged to the complex code will be allocated to individual fires prior to apportionment as follows: = + � ∗ Where: � (1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + ) = , ℎ ℎ = ℎ = ℎ =

Billing Criteria for Complexes. An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires involving that that involve multiple jurisdictions that and are managed as an Incident Complex. Only costs that cannot be reasonably attributed to an individual fire will be assigned to the Complex code unless otherwise directed in an incident-specific cost apportionment agreement. Incident costs charged to the Complex will be allocated to individual fires based the percentage of effort involved in managing individual fires. The allocation method employed will be documented in the incident-specific cost apportionment agreement By default, when wildfires are assigned to a complex, costs for each fire within the complex will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above. By default, costs charged to the complex code will be allocated to individual fires prior to apportionment as follows: Where: = + � ∗ Where: � (1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + ) = , ℎ ℎ = ℎ = ℎ =

Billing Criteria for Complexes. ‌ An incident-specific cost apportionment agreement should be considered for allocating costs between fires involving that that involve multiple jurisdictions that and are managed as an Incident Complex. Only costs that cannot be reasonably attributed to an individual fire will be assigned to the Complex code unless otherwise directed in an incident-specific cost apportionment agreement. Incident costs charged to the Complex will be allocated to individual fires based the percentage of effort involved in managing individual fires. The allocation method employed will be documented in the incident-specific cost apportionment agreement By default, when wildfires are assigned to a complex, costs for each fire within the complex will be apportioned as described in Clause 38.a above. By default, costs charged to the complex code will be allocated to individual fires prior to apportionment as follows: Where: = + � ∗ Where: � (1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + ) = , ℎ ℎ = ℎ = ℎ =