Common use of Building rehabilitation Clause in Contracts

Building rehabilitation. VDHP shall ensure that building rehabilitation plans and specifications for non-exempt CDBG activities are developed in accordance with the recommended approaches in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings (Standards) (Appendix D) as follows: a. Prior to the initiation of such activities, the Recipient shall submit to the qualified professional work write-ups or plans and specifications which evidence adherence to the Standards. The qualified professional shall review and make recommendations for VDHP approval of the plans and specifications. b. If the qualified professional recommends modifications to the work write-ups or plans and specifications to ensure that the project meets the Standards, the Recipient shall make appropriate modifications and submit revised work write-ups or plans and specifications to the qualified professional. c. If building demolition or other adverse effect is proposed, the qualified professional may ask the Recipient to provide the following information in order for the qualified professional to evaluate the feasibility of the undertaking: i. condition assessments for various historic elements; ii. alternative treatments considered and cost estimates for each; iii. life-cycle maintenance costs related to each alternative; iv. proposed measures to mitigate or minimize adverse effects; and v. available marketing studies. d. After reviewing the project documentation, the qualified professional shall submit a recommendation for finding of effect, with any relevant conditions, if appropriate, to VDHP for SHPO concurrence. e. If the Recipient determines that they cannot make the modifications recommended by the qualified professional to meet the Standards and that the project will therefore have an adverse effect on historic properties, the qualified professional and the Recipient shall consult with VDHP to develop a Standard Mitigation Measures Agreement in accordance with Section VI. f. In lieu of the review process outlined above, for building rehabilitation projects that use the Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit (RITC), a Recipient may substitute a Part 2 Historic Preservation Certification Application (HPCA), approved and signed by the National Park Service, as evidence of compliance with the Standards. If the project contains work that was not included in and approved in the HPCA, such as new construction or ground disturbance that might affect archaeological sites, the remainder of the project shall be reviewed as outlined in this Agreement. i. A Memorandum of Agreement may be executed amongst project parties recording that the pending Part 2 HPCA shall substitute for the Section 106 review process. (See Appendix H for template); and ii. If it is determined the project shall not use RITC, the review process outlined above shall be implemented and the agreement terminated.

Building rehabilitation. VDHP VHCB shall ensure that building the rehabilitation plans and specifications for non-non- exempt CDBG HOME Program activities are developed in accordance with the recommended approaches in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings (Standards) (Appendix D) as follows: a. Prior to the initiation of such activities, the Recipient Applicant shall submit to the qualified professional work write-ups or plans and specifications which that evidence adherence to the Standards. The qualified professional shall review and make recommendations for VDHP approval concurrence of the plans and specifications. SHPO will concur or request changes within fifteen (15) days. b. If the qualified professional recommends modifications to the work write-ups or plans and specifications to ensure that the project meets the Standards, the Recipient Applicant shall make appropriate modifications and submit revised work write-ups or plans and specifications to the qualified professional. c. If building demolition or other another adverse effect is proposed, the qualified professional may ask the Recipient Applicant to provide the following information in order for the qualified professional to evaluate the feasibility of and justification for the undertaking: i. condition assessments for various historic elements; ii. alternative treatments considered and with cost estimates for each; iii. life-cycle maintenance costs related to each alternative; iv. proposed measures to mitigate or minimize adverse effects; and v. available marketing studies. d. After reviewing the project documentation, the qualified professional shall submit a recommendation for finding of effect, with any relevant conditions, if appropriate, to VDHP for SHPO concurrence. SHPO will respond within fifteen (15) days. This step may be combined with the recommendation of eligibility described in Section IV of this Programmatic Agreement for faster processing. e. If the Recipient Applicant determines that they he/she cannot make the modifications recommended by the qualified professional to meet the Standards and that the project will therefore have an adverse effect on historic properties, the qualified professional and the Recipient Applicant shall consult with VDHP SHPO and VHCB to develop a Standard Mitigation Measures Agreement in accordance with Section VI. f. In lieu of the review process outlined above, for building rehabilitation projects that use the Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit (RITC)Credit, a Recipient may substitute a the Part 2 Historic Preservation Certification Application (HPCA), may serve as evidence for compliance with the Standards. The Part 2 must be approved and signed by the National Park Service, as evidence of compliance with the Standards. Service and submitted to SHPO and VHCB. g. If the project contains work that was not included in and or approved in within the HPCAPart 2, such as new construction or ground disturbance that might affect archaeological sites, the remainder of the project shall be reviewed as outlined in this Programmatic Agreement. i. A Memorandum of Agreement may be executed amongst project parties recording that the pending Part 2 HPCA shall substitute for the Section 106 review process. (See Appendix H for template); and ii. If it is determined the project shall not use RITC, the review process outlined above shall be implemented and the agreement terminated.

Building rehabilitation. VDHP shall ensure that building rehabilitation plans and specifications for non-exempt CDBG activities are developed in accordance with the recommended approaches in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings (Standards) (Appendix D) as follows: a. Prior to the initiation of such activities, the Recipient shall submit to the qualified professional work write-ups or plans and specifications which evidence adherence to the Standards. The qualified professional shall review and make recommendations for VDHP approval of the plans and specifications. b. If the qualified professional recommends modifications to the work write-ups or plans and specifications to ensure that the project meets the Standards, the Recipient shall make appropriate modifications and submit revised work write-ups or plans and specifications to the qualified professional. c. If building demolition or other adverse effect is proposed, the qualified professional may ask the Recipient to provide the following information in order for the qualified professional to evaluate the feasibility of the undertaking: i. : condition assessments for various historic elements; ii. ; alternative treatments considered and cost estimates for each; iii. ; life-cycle maintenance costs related to each alternative; iv. ; proposed measures to mitigate or minimize adverse effects; and v. and available marketing studies. d. After reviewing the project documentation, the qualified professional shall submit a recommendation for finding of effect, with any relevant conditions, if appropriate, to VDHP for SHPO concurrence. e. If the Recipient determines that they cannot make the modifications recommended by the qualified professional to meet the Standards and that the project will therefore have an adverse effect on historic properties, the qualified professional and the Recipient shall consult with VDHP to develop a Standard Mitigation Measures Agreement in accordance with Section VI. f. . In lieu of the review process outlined above, for building rehabilitation projects that use the Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit (RITC), a Recipient may substitute a Part 2 Historic Preservation Certification Application (HPCA), approved and signed by the National Park Service, as evidence of compliance with the Standards. If the project contains work that was not included in and approved in the HPCA, such as new construction or ground disturbance that might affect archaeological sites, the remainder of the project shall be reviewed as outlined in this Agreement. i. . A Memorandum of Agreement may be executed amongst project parties recording that the pending Part 2 HPCA shall substitute for the Section 106 review process. (See Appendix H for template); and ii. and If it is determined the project shall not use RITC, the review process outlined above shall be implemented and the agreement terminated.

Building rehabilitation. VDHP shall ensure that building rehabilitation plans and specifications for non-exempt CDBG activities are developed in accordance with the recommended approaches in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings (Standards) (Appendix DC) as follows: a. Prior to the initiation of such activities, the Recipient CEDO shall submit to the qualified professional work write-ups or plans and professional/approved CEDO employee documentation, plans, and/or specifications which that evidence adherence to the Standards. The qualified professional professional/approved CEDO employee shall review and make recommendations for VDHP approval of the plans and specifications. b. If the qualified professional professional/approved CEDO employee recommends modifications to the work write-ups or plans and and/or specifications to ensure that the project meets the Standards, the Recipient CEDO shall make appropriate modifications and submit revised work write-ups or plans and specifications revisions to the qualified professional/approved CEDO employee. c. If building demolition or other adverse effect is proposed, the qualified professional professional/approved CEDO employee may ask the Recipient CEDO to provide the following information in order for the qualified professional to evaluate an evaluation of the feasibility of the undertaking: i. : condition assessments for various historic elements; ii. ; alternative treatments considered and cost estimates for each; iii. ; life-cycle maintenance costs related to each alternative; iv. ; proposed measures to mitigate or minimize adverse effects; and v. and available marketing studies. d. After reviewing the project documentation, the qualified professional professional/approved CEDO employee shall submit a recommendation for finding of effect, with any relevant conditions, if appropriate, to VDHP for SHPO concurrence. e. If the Recipient CEDO determines that they cannot make the modifications recommended by the qualified professional professional/approved CEDO employee to meet the Standards and that the project will therefore have an adverse effect on historic properties, the qualified professional professional/approved CEDO employee and the Recipient CEDO officials shall consult with VDHP to develop a Standard Mitigation Measures Agreement in accordance with Section VI. f. In lieu of the review process outlined above, for building rehabilitation projects that use the Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit (RITC), a Recipient CEDO may substitute a Part 2 Historic Preservation Certification Application (HPCA), approved and signed by the National Park Service, as evidence of compliance with the Standards. If the project contains work that was not included in and approved in the HPCA, such as new construction or ground disturbance that might affect archaeological sites, the remainder of the project shall be reviewed as outlined in this Agreement. i. A Memorandum of Agreement may be executed amongst project parties recording that the pending Part 2 HPCA shall substitute for the Section 106 review process. (See Appendix H for template); and ii. If it is determined the project shall not use RITC, the review process outlined above shall be implemented and the agreement terminated.