Cardinality Bounds Sample Clauses

Cardinality Bounds. To bound the alphabet size of the random variables T and X, we use the Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx-Carathe´odory lemma [108] and arguments similar to [109]. Let N0 =|HA|4 + 3 (115) N1 =|T |(|HA|4 + 2) . (116) First, fix pX|T (x|t), and consider the ensemble {pT (t)pX|T (x|t) , ϕt,x}. Every mixed state ϕA has a unique parametric representation u(ϕA) of dimension |HA|4 − 1, since the corresponding density matrix has |HA|2 complex entries and the constraint Tr(ϕA) = 1. Then, define a map f0 : X → RN0 by f0(t) = .u(ρt ) , H(B|T = t)ρ , H(E|T = t)ρ , H(B|X, T = t)ρ , H(E|X, T = t)ρΣ (117) where ρt = Σx pX|T (x|t)θt,x. The map f0 can be extended to probability distributions as follows, Σ F0 : pT ›→ pT (t)f0(t) = (u(ρA) , H(B|T )ρ , H(E|T )ρ , H(B|X, T )ρ , H(E|X, T )ρ) (118) where ρA = Σt pT (t)ρt . According to the Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx-Carathe´odory lemma [108], any point in the convex closure of a connected compact set within Rd belongs to the convex hull of d points in the set. Since the map F0 is linear, it maps the set of distributions on T to a connected compact set in RN0 . Thus, for every pT , there exists a probability distribution pT¯ on a subset T ⊆ T of size N0, such that F0(pT¯) = F0(pT ). We deduce that the alphabet size can be restricted to |T | ≤ N0, while preserving ρA and ρBE ≡ LA→BE(ρA); I(T ; B)ρ = H(B)ρ − H(B|T )ρ, I(X; B|T )ρ = H(B|T )ρ − H(B|X, T )ρ; and similarly, I(T ; E)ρ and I(X; E|T )ρ. f (t)(x) = .pT (t) , u(ϕt,x) , H(B|X = x, T = t)ρ , H(E|X = x, T = t)ρΣ (119) We move to the alphabet size of X. We keep T and pT fixed. Then, define the map f (t) : X → RN1 by 1 A X T =t for t ∈ T . Now, the extended map is F (t) : p | | (x|t)f (t)(x) = .pT (t) , u(ρt ) , H(B|X, T = t)ρ , H(E|X, T = t)ρ}t∈T Σ . (120) By the Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx-Carathe´odory lemma [108], for every pX|T , there exists pX¯ |T on a subset X ⊆ X of size N1, such that F (t)(p ¯ ) = F (t)(pX|T =t) for all t ∈ T . Thus, we can restrict the alphabet size to |X | ≤ N1, while preserving ρt ,
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Cardinality Bounds

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • Originality of Services Except as to standard generic details, Consultant agrees that all technologies, formulae, procedures, processes, methods, writings, ideas, dialogue, compositions, recordings, teleplays and video productions prepared for, written for, or submitted to the District and/or used in connection with this Agreement, shall be wholly original to Consultant and shall not be copied in whole or in part from any other source, except that submitted to Consultant by District as a basis for such services.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Quality of Services (a) The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished pursuant to this Agreement. (b) To that end, the Consultant shall correct or shall revise, without additional compensation, any errors or omissions in its work product or shall make such revisions as are necessary as the result of the failure of the Consultant to provide an accurate, more efficient, and properly constructable product in its designs, drawings, specifications, or other services. (c) The County's review/approval/acceptance of or payment for the services required by this Agreement shall NOT be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement. Additionally, the Consultant shall be and remain liable to the County in accordance with applicable law for all damages to the County caused by the Consultant's negligent performance of any of the services furnished under this Agreement. (d) The rights and remedies of the County provided for under this Agreement are in addition to any other rights and remedies otherwise provided by law.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Quality- and Cost-Based Selection Except as ADB may otherwise agree, the Borrower shall apply quality- and cost-based selection for selecting and engaging consulting services.

  • Description of Vendor Entity and Vendor's Goods & Services If awarded, this description of Vendor and Vendor's goods and services will appear on the TIPS website for customer/public viewing. Technology solutions value-added reseller and installer of all things technology. Please identify the individual who will be primarily responsible for all TIPS matters and inquiries for the duration of the contract. Xxxx Xxxxxxx Primary Contact Title VP of Sales Please enter a valid email address that will definitely reach the Primary Contact. xxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx Numbers only, no symbols or spaces (Ex. 8668398477). The system will auto-populate your entry with commas once submitted which is appropriate and expected (Ex. 8,668,398,477). Please provide the accurate and current phone number where the individual who will be primarily responsible for all TIPS matters and inquiries for the duration of the contract can be reached directly. 0000000000 Numbers only, no symbols or spaces (Ex. 8668398477). The system will auto-populate your entry with commas once submitted which is appropriate and expected (Ex. 8,668,398,477). 0000000000 Numbers only, no symbols or spaces (Ex. 8668398477). The system will auto-populate your entry with commas once submitted which is appropriate and expected (Ex. 8,668,398,477). 0000000000

  • Equality and Diversity 33.2.1 The Supplier shall: (a) perform its obligations under this Framework Agreement (including those in relation to the provision of the Goods and/or Services) in accordance with: (i) all applicable equality Law (whether in relation to race, sex, gender reassignment, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation, pregnancy, maternity, age or otherwise); and (ii) any other requirements and instructions which the Authority reasonably imposes in connection with any equality obligations imposed on the Authority at any time under applicable equality Law; (b) take all necessary steps, and inform the Authority of the steps taken, to prevent unlawful discrimination designated as such by any court or tribunal, or the Equality and Human Rights Commission or (any successor organisation).

  • Quality and Extent of Services The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, XXXX provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel and the resources made available to such personnel. The Board also considered the risks to XXXX in sponsoring or managing the Fund, including financial, operational and reputational risks, the potential economic impact to XXXX from such risks and XXXX’s approach to addressing such risks. The Board reviewed the Fund’s performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market index(es) and a peer universe compiled using information supplied by Morningstar Direct (“Morningstar”), an independent fund data service. The Board also noted that it has put into place a process of identifying “Funds in Review” (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to a peer universe), and receives additional reporting from XXXX regarding such funds and, where appropriate, XXXX’s plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that, for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2020, the Fund’s performance (Class A shares) was in the 2nd quartile of the applicable Morningstar universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has underperformed its benchmark in the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2020. Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund’s investment management fee schedule, operating expenses and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) and the Fee Consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds

  • PROCUREMENT ETHICS Contractor understands that a person who is interested in any way in the sale of any supplies, services, construction, or insurance to the State of Utah is violating the law if the person gives or offers to give any compensation, gratuity, contribution, loan, reward, or any promise thereof to any person acting as a procurement officer on behalf of the State of Utah, or who in any official capacity participates in the procurement of such supplies, services, construction, or insurance, whether it is given for their own use or for the use or benefit of any other person or organization.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!