Client Reviews Sample Clauses

Client Reviews. Upon at least 30 days’ written notice from Client to SS&C, Client, through its staff or agents (other than any Person that is a competitor of SS&C), and Government Authorities with jurisdiction over the Client (each a “Reviewer”) may conduct a reasonable, on-site review of the operational and technology infrastructure controls used by SS&C to provide the Services and meet SS&C’s confidentiality and information security obligations under this Agreement (a “Review”). Client shall accommodate SS&C requests to reschedule any Review based on the availability of required resources. With respect to any Review, Client shall: (a) Pay SS&C costs, provided that Client shall not be responsible for SS&C’s own internal costs associated with SS&C personnel supervising such Review or performing such tasks are reasonably necessary to allow Client to perform such Review. (b) Comply, and ensure that Reviewers comply, with SS&C’s policies and procedures relating to physical, computer and network security, business continuity, safety and security. (c) Ensure that all Reviewers are bound by written confidentiality obligations substantially similar to, and no less protective than, those set forth in the Agreement (which Client shall provide to SS&C upon request). (d) Except for mandatory Reviews by Government Authorities, be limited to 1 Review per calendar year.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Client Reviews. Upon at least 30 days’ written notice from Client to SS&C, Client, through its staff or agents (other than any Person that is a competitor of SS&C), and Governmental Authorities with jurisdiction over the Client (each, a “Reviewer”) may conduct a reasonable, on-site review of the operational and technology infrastructure controls used by SS&C to provide the Services and meet SS&C’s confidentiality and information security obligations under this Agreement (a “Review”). Client shall accommodate SS&C requests to reschedule the Review based on the availability of required resources. With respect to any Review, Client shall: (a) Ensure that the Review is conducted in a manner that does not disrupt SS&C’s business operations. (b) Pay SS&C costs outside of normal operations, including staff time at standard rates. (c) Comply, and ensure that Reviewers comply, with SS&C policies and procedures relating to physical, computer and network security, business continuity, safety and security. (d) Ensure that all Reviewers are bound by written confidentiality obligations substantially similar to, and no less protective than, those set forth in the Agreement (which Client shall provide to SS&C upon request). (e) Except for mandatory Reviews by Governmental Authorities, be limited to one (1) Review per calendar year.
Sample 1
Client Reviews. Upon at least 30 days’ written notice from Fund to SS&C, Fund, through its staff or agents (other than any Person that is a competitor of SS&C), and Government Authorities with jurisdiction over Fund (each a “Reviewer”) may conduct a reasonable, on-site review of the operational and technology infrastructure controls used by SS&C to provide the Services and meet SS&C’s confidentiality and information security obligations under this Agreement (a “Review”). Fund shall accommodate SS&C requests to reschedule any Review based on the availability of required resources. With respect to any Review, Fund shall: (a) Ensure that the Review is conducted in a manner that does not disrupt SS&C’s business operations. (b) Pay SS&C costs, including staff time at standard rates. (c) Comply, and ensure that Reviewers comply, with SS&C’s policies and procedures relating to physical, computer and network security, business continuity, safety and security.
Sample 1
Client Reviews. Upon at least thirty (30) days’ written notice from Fund to SS&C, Fund, through its officers or agents (other than any Person that is a competitor of SS&C), and Government Authorities with jurisdiction over the Fund (each, a “Reviewer”) may conduct a reasonable, on-site review of the operational and technology infrastructure controls used by SS&C to provide the Services and meet SS&C’s confidentiality and information security obligations under this Agreement (a “Review”). Fund shall use reasonable best efforts to accommodate SS&C requests to reschedule any Review based on the availability of required resources. With respect to any Review, Fund shall: (a) Ensure that the Review is conducted in a manner that does not disrupt SS&C’s business operations. (b) Pay SS&C’s reasonable costs, including staff time at standard rates for up to 200 hours; provided that any such costs in excess of those incurred for up to 200 hours of staff time at standard rates must be pre-approved by Fund. (c) Comply, and ensure that Reviewers comply, with SS&C’s policies and procedures relating to physical computer and network security, business continuity, safety and security. (d) Ensure that all Reviewers agree in writing to confidentiality obligations substantially similar to, and no less protective than, those set forth in this Agreement (which Fund shall provide to SS&C upon request). (e) Except for mandatory Review by Government Authorities, be limited to one (1) review per calendar year.
Sample 1

Related to Client Reviews

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Due Diligence Review; Information The Company shall make available, during normal business hours, for inspection and review by the Investors, advisors to and representatives of the Investors (who may or may not be affiliated with the Investors and who are reasonably acceptable to the Company), all financial and other records, all SEC Filings (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) and other filings with the SEC, and all other corporate documents and properties of the Company as may be reasonably necessary for the purpose of such review, and cause the Company’s officers, directors and employees, within a reasonable time period, to supply all such information reasonably requested by the Investors or any such representative, advisor or underwriter in connection with such Registration Statement (including, without limitation, in response to all questions and other inquiries reasonably made or submitted by any of them), prior to and from time to time after the filing and effectiveness of the Registration Statement for the sole purpose of enabling the Investors and such representatives, advisors and underwriters and their respective accountants and attorneys to conduct initial and ongoing due diligence with respect to the Company and the accuracy of such Registration Statement. The Company shall not disclose material nonpublic information to the Investors, or to advisors to or representatives of the Investors, unless prior to disclosure of such information the Company identifies such information as being material nonpublic information and provides the Investors, such advisors and representatives with the opportunity to accept or refuse to accept such material nonpublic information for review and any Investor wishing to obtain such information enters into an appropriate confidentiality agreement with the Company with respect thereto.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Rent Review 3.1 If the reference base used to compile the Index shall change after today’s date the figure taken to be shown in the Index after the change shall be the figure which would have been shown in the Index if the reference base current at today’s date had been retained 3.2 If it becomes impossible by reason of any change after today’s date in the methods used to compile the Index or for any other reason whatever to calculate the revised Rent by reference to the Index or if any dispute or question whatever shall arise between the parties with respect to the amount of the revised Rent or the determination of the revised Rent such matter shall at the option of the Landlord be determined by an independent valuer to be appointed either by agreement between the parties or in the absence of agreement by the President for the time being of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (or his duly appointed deputy or any person authorised by him to make appointments on his behalf) on the application of either party who shall have full power to determine on such dates as he shall deem apposite what would have been the increase in the Index had it continued on the same basis and in view of the information assumed to be available for the operation of this rent review or (if that determination shall also be impossible) shall determine a reasonable revised Rent for the Property on such dates having regard to the purposes and intent of the provisions in this Lease for the review of the Rent 4 The Landlord shall give written notice to the Tenant of the amount of the revised Rent and thereafter memoranda (in such form as the Landlord shall reasonably require) recording the amount of the revised Rent shall be signed by or on behalf of the Landlord and the Tenant and annexed to this Lease and the Counterpart thereof and the parties shall bear their own costs of this procedure 5 If the new Rent payable on and from any Review Date has not been agreed by that Review Date Rent shall thereafter be payable at the rate in force immediately before the Review Date and forthwith upon the revised Rent being ascertained the Tenant shall pay to the Landlord an amount representing the difference (“the Shortfall”) between:- 5.1 the amount of the yearly Rent which would have been payable for the period from that Review Date until the next payment date following the date of ascertainment if the revised Rent had been ascertained at that Review Date and 5.2 together with interest at the rate of 2% below the Interest Rate on the Shortfall calculated on a day to day basis upon those parts of the Shortfall which would have been payable if the revised Rent had been ascertained at that Review Date

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!