Comparative Analysis. Section VII is dedicated to present a comparative analysis of the proposed solution. Here, the proposed scheme is compared with the work done by Xxx et al. [51], Xxxxxx et al. [53], Xxxxx et al. [42] and Xxxxx et al. [54].
Comparative Analysis. Following receipt of responses (including oral presentations), and completion of evaluation of each eligible individual Quoter’s response, the Government may perform a comparative analysis (comparing Quoter responses to one another) to select the Quoter(s) that are best suited to fulfill the requirements, based on the Quoters’ responses to the factors outlined in this RFQ and their relative importance.
Comparative Analysis. If Customer is utilizing Comparative Analysis, Vendor requires that the Customer meets Vendor’s requirements for a currently supported Operating System and a spatially accurate map. Vendor will have final approval in those requirements and specifications.
Comparative Analysis. Russia was the first country with whom the EU started a visa dialogue with the long term perspective of visa- free travel, but is not the only one. Most other VFAs also contain a reference to visa liberalisation, except the agreement with Cape Verde. For most of the Western Balkan countries, a visa-free regime is already in place and also with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia concrete steps have been taken. The road toward the end-goal takes the same route for all these countries: all of the negotiations are centred around the same four blocks as we can find in the Common Steps. The start of the negotiations with the countries from the Western Balkan was made dependent on the fulfilment of technical reforms proposed by the Union, which took the form of a Roadmap. These lists of technical benchmarks were more or less the same for all the Western Balkan countries.
Comparative Analysis. ⚫ Owing to the cooperation, the quality menagement system hes been harmoniyed with the European standards, the procedure and the process of self- evaluation has been inproved. Larning otucomes and skills have been clearly defaned by each programme. The result is progress which is graphically showed.
Comparative Analysis. Detailed functional analysis of the applicant and all involved parties in the transactions covered by the APA. Β. Description and assessment of the risks to be assumed by each party in the transactions covered by the APA.
Comparative Analysis. This section compares the proposed BioKA-ASVN’s per- formance with other related competing schemes, such as the schemes suggested by Adavoudi-Jolfaei et al. [7], Ma et al. [8], Xxx et al. [9], Xx et al. [10], Xxxx and Xxxx [35], Xxx and Xxx [6], Ever [11], Xxxxxx et al. [25], Xxxxx et al. [37], and Xxxxx et al. [38].
Comparative Analysis. A comparative case study of the four settlements – the Lower Pecos, the San Xxxx-Navajo, the Taos, and the Xxxxxx – revealed that although there are significant underlying differences, the agreements have surprising and significant commonalities. All four of the agreements are highly complex and address long-standing entrenched conflicts. They stem from water rights adjudication processes that have been ongoing for decades. The adjudications and associated settlement agreements involve thousands of diverse litigants and stakeholders with a wide variety of interests. Despite the fact that the four agreements were negotiated largely by local people in different basins with substantially different local characteristics and widely varying amounts of water, the overarching outcomes of the settlements are surprisingly similar. To provide some perspective, Table 2 lists some introductory statistics associated with each of the four case studies. Each of the case studies involves water rights adjudication litigation that was filed decades ago, is highly complex, and remains incomplete. All four involve settlement agreements that were signed within a few years of each other, although the length of time to negotiate each settlement varied widely. The basins vary greatly in size, population, and quantity of water involved. There are Native American lands in each of the basins, but only three of the settlements involve tribes. Correspondingly, although all four settlements require significant government funding, funding from federal sources is provided only for the three settlements involving tribes. Table 2. Basic Statistics Lower Pecos San Xxxx- Navajo Taos Xxxxxx Year Adjudication Filed 1956 1975 1969 1966 Number of Water Rights Claimants ~2000+ ~18,000 ~7,000 ~3,000+ Year Settlement Signed 2003 2005 2006 2006 Population of Basin (in 2000) 139,000 97,000 16,000 11,000 Area of Basin (square miles) 16,777 9,762 524 200 Available Water in Basin (AF/yr)* 125,000 1,100,000 68,000 7,000 Water Rights Settled (AF/yr)* 56,000 326,000 ~65,000 ~7,000 Number of Tribes in Basin 1 3 1 4 Number of Tribes Involved in Settlement 0 1 1 4 Federal Funding ** 0 $820M $120M $170M State Funding** $100M+ $25M $14M $50M Local Government Funding** 0 $30M 0 $62M Total Government Funding** $100M+ $875M $134M $282M The settlement agreements are extremely complex documents, with a myriad of provisions and details addressing the specific circumstances in each basin and the particular interests of...
Comparative Analysis. The CONSULTANT shall perform a comparative analysis between the Needs Assessment and the Cost Feasible Plan (CFP) and identify non-cost feasible projects that will not make the CFP. The CONSULTANT shall identify and evaluate the impacts on levels of service for all modes of transportation and land use, of not being able to finance all projects in the Needs Assessment.
Comparative Analysis. In the following lines a comparative between different programmes is done. As mentioned at the beginning of this section, in order to compare the programmes developed in this project with others implemented some years ago and well setted, two programmes have been taken into account: "Production technology and organisation Bachelor’s degree" from FH Joanneum and "Bachelor's Degree in Process and Product Innovation Engineering" at IMH. At the same time, in order to compare the most dualized possible Bachelor's programmes, from TUV only the “Naval Architecture and Marine Technology” programme will be taken into account. For comparative purposes, the following criteria were defined:
(1) total number of ECTS of the programme
(2) total nº. of ECTS corresponding to practical activities in the regular programme
(3) total number of ECTS of the dual programme
(4) total no. of ECTS/real hours corresponding to practical activities in the dual programme
(5) timing of practical activities (semesters)
(6) dual activities incorporated in the regular timetable or using holiday periods
(7) selection criteria for practical training entity
(8) contract/agreements
(9) payment during practical trainings
(10) quantity business partners
