Common use of Conduct of the Investigatory Meeting Clause in Contracts

Conduct of the Investigatory Meeting. The intent of the investigatory meeting is threefold: 22.§2.3.1 To provide a meeting in which information and documentation about the source of the concern and discussion of the applicable article of the Western/WMU- AAUP Agreement, as well as the possible consequences are explained to the bargaining unit faculty member; 22.§2.3.2 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member to receive the information, to seek clarification of the issues, and to provide, if so desired, an explanation of the concerns. The information, evidence, and/or documentation of the concern and its source available to Western shall be presented at this time, although Western shall not be precluded from using additional evidence which becomes available subsequent to the investigatory meeting. Any subsequent evidence to be used by Western shall be made available to the bargaining unit faculty member; 22.§2.3.3 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member an opportunity to respond to the concerns and to provide an explanation concerning the issues. At the investigatory meeting, the bargaining unit faculty member may respond, stand silent and simply receive the information, or respond through an intermediary. The bargaining unit faculty member should be aware that anything he/she says may be used in any subsequent disciplinary hearings.

Conduct of the Investigatory Meeting. The intent of the investigatory meeting is threefold: 22.§2.3.1 To provide a meeting in which information and documentation about the source of the concern and discussion of the applicable article of the Western/WMU- WMU-AAUP Agreement, as well as the possible consequences are explained to the bargaining unit faculty member; 22.§2.3.2 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member to receive the information, to seek clarification of the issues, and to provide, if so desired, an explanation of the concerns. The information, evidence, and/or documentation of the concern and its source available to Western shall be presented at this time, although Western shall not be precluded from using additional evidence which becomes available subsequent to the investigatory meeting. Any subsequent evidence to be used by Western shall be made available to the bargaining unit faculty member; 22.§2.3.3 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member an opportunity to respond to the concerns and to provide an explanation concerning the issues. At the investigatory meeting, the bargaining unit faculty member may respond, stand silent and simply receive the information, or respond through an intermediary. The bargaining unit faculty member should be aware that anything he/she says may be used in any subsequent disciplinary hearings.

Conduct of the Investigatory Meeting. The intent of the investigatory meeting is threefold: 22.§2.3.1 To provide a meeting in which information and documentation about the source of the concern and discussion of the applicable article of the WesternWMU/WMU- AAUP Agreement, as well as the possible consequences are explained to the bargaining unit faculty member; 22.§2.3.2 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member to receive the information, to seek clarification of the issues, and to provide, if so desired, an explanation of the concerns. The information, evidence, and/or documentation of the concern and its source available to Western shall be presented at this time, although Western shall not be precluded from using additional evidence which becomes available subsequent to the investigatory meeting. Any subsequent evidence to be used by Western shall be made available to the bargaining unit faculty member;. 22.§2.3.3 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member an opportunity to respond to the concerns and to provide an explanation concerning the issues. At the investigatory meeting, the bargaining unit faculty member may respond, stand silent and simply receive the information, or respond through an intermediary. The bargaining unit faculty member should be aware that anything he/she says may be used in any subsequent disciplinary hearings.

Conduct of the Investigatory Meeting. The intent of the investigatory meeting is threefold: 22.§2.3.1 22.§2.2.1 To provide a meeting in which information and documentation about the source of the concern and discussion of the applicable article of the WesternWMU/WMU- AAUP Agreement, as well as the possible consequences are explained to the bargaining unit faculty member; 22.§2.3.2 22.§2.2.2 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member to receive the information, to seek clarification of the issues, and to provide, if so desired, an explanation of the concerns. The information, evidence, and/or documentation of the concern and its source available to Western shall be presented at this time, although Western shall not be precluded from using additional evidence which becomes available subsequent to the investigatory meeting. Any subsequent evidence to be used by Western shall be made available to the bargaining unit faculty member;. 22.§2.3.3 22.§2.2.3 To allow the bargaining unit faculty member an opportunity to respond to the concerns and to provide an explanation concerning the issues. At the investigatory meeting, the bargaining unit faculty member may respond, stand silent and simply receive the information, or respond through an intermediary. The bargaining unit faculty member should be aware that anything he/she says may be used in any subsequent disciplinary hearings.