CONSISTENCY WITH CPUC DECISIONS Sample Clauses

CONSISTENCY WITH CPUC DECISIONS. A. Fit with Identified Renewable Resource Needs PG&E’s 2008 renewable procurement plan (“2008 Plan”) was conditionally approved in D.00-00-000 on February 14, 2008. As required by statute, the 2008 Plan include an assessment of supply and demand to determine the optimal mix of renewable generation resources, consideration of compliance flexibility mechanisms established by the Commission, and a bid solicitation setting forth the need for renewable generation of various operational characteristics.4 The goal of PG&E’s 2008 Plan was to procure approximately one to two percent of its retail sales volume, or between 800 GWh and 1,600 GWh per year. Projects capable of providing actual deliveries with only a short or no delay are especially valuable to PG&E. By replacing this standard offer QF contract with a new RPS contract, PG&E expects to receive, among other things, incremental RPS-eligible energy deliveries over the existing QF contract as well as an extended contract term (five years longer than the existing QF contract term). Accordingly, the PPA meets the criteria for renewables procurement contained in the 2008 Plan. The PPA will additionally contribute to PG&E’s 2010 RPS target and to PG&E’s RPS goals in the years beyond 2010.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CONSISTENCY WITH CPUC DECISIONS

  • Other Procurement Procedures The following procurement methods may be used for the procurement of works and goods that the Bank agrees meets the requirements established in the provisions of Section III of the Procurement Policies:

  • Review by the Bank of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Bank’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Bank.

  • Additional Wet Weather Procedure 14.15.1 Remaining On Site Where, because of wet weather, the employees are prevented from working:

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when:

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • CONCLUSION OF NEGOTIATIONS A. The State and MSEA-SEIU agree that this Agreement concludes all collective negotiations during its term. Neither party will during the term of this Agreement seek to unilaterally modify its terms through legislation or other means which may be available to them.

  • Agreement Overview This SLA operates in conjunction with, and does not supersede or replace any part of, the Agreement. It outlines the information technology service levels that we will provide to you to ensure the availability of the application services that you have requested us to provide. All other support services are documented in the Support Call Process.

  • Written Decisions Decisions rendered at Level One which are unsatisfactory to the aggrieved person and all decisions rendered at Levels Two and Three of the grievance procedure shall be in writing setting forth the decision and the reasons therefore, and shall be transmitted promptly to all parties in interest and to the Association.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.