Consistency With Commission Guidelines for Bilateral Contracting Sample Clauses

Consistency With Commission Guidelines for Bilateral Contracting. The Commission has developed guidelines for how the IOUs may enter into bilateral RPS contracts. In D.00-00-000, the Commission authorized entry into bilateral RPS contracts provided that such contracts did not require Public Goods Charge funds and were “prudent.”5 In D.00-00-000, the Commission again held that bilateral contracts were permissible provided that they were at least one month in duration, and also found that such contracts must be reasonable and submitted for Commission approval by advice letter.6 In addition, the Commission stated that bilateral contracts were not eligible for supplemental energy payments.7 Similarly, the Commission required that bilateral contracts be: (1) submitted for Commission approval; (2) longer than one month in duration; (3) do not receive above-market funds (“AMFs”); and (4) are deemed reasonable by the Commission.8 Finally, in D.00-00-000, the Commission determined that bilateral contracts should be reviewed using the same standards as contracts resulting from RPS solicitations.9 The Amended PPA satisfies the four requirements listed above and the requirements of D.00-00-000. The Original PPA was approved by the Commission in Resolution E-4340 on July 29, 2010, and the Amended PPA is being submitted for approval through this Advice Letter. The Amended PPA is not eligible for AMFs because it resulted from bilateral negotiations. The Amended PPA has a 25-year term, and is therefore longer than one month in duration. Finally, as PG&E explains in attached Confidential Appendix D, the terms and conditions in the Amended PPA do not materially change the economics of the Project for PG&E as compared to the Original PPA. In Resolution E- 4340, the Commission concluded that: “[t]he total all-in costs of the Rice Solar Energy, LLC power purchase agreement are reasonable based on their relation to bids received in response to Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s 2009 solicitation for renewable resources.”10 5 D.00-00-000 at pp. 57-58. 6 D.00-00-000 at p. 29. 7 Id. at p. 31. 8 Resolution E-4216 at p. 5. 9 D.00-00-000 at p. 29. 10 Resolution E-4340, Findings and Conclusions No.7.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consistency With Commission Guidelines for Bilateral Contracting. PG&E negotiated the PPA on a bilateral basis because the offer was at a favorable price (i.e. below the 2009 MPR) with acceptable terms and conditions, and because there was a high probability that, if the offer had been deferred to PG&E’s 2011 RPS solicitation, the Project’s online date could have been significantly delayed. By negotiating this transaction on a bilateral basis, rather than through the 2011 RPS Solicitation, PG&E will be able to secure deliveries of RPS-eligible power from the PPA beginning in late 2012 (assuming Commission approval in 2011) to enhance its 20% RPS compliance position through 2013. To address the issue of bilateral contracting, the Commission developed guidelines pursuant to which utilities may enter into bilateral RPS contracts. In D.00-00-000, the Commission authorized entry into bilateral RPS contracts, provided that such contracts did not require Public Goods Charge funds and were “prudent.”9 Later, in D.00-00-000, the Commission again held that bilateral contracts were permissible provided that they were at least one month in duration and also found that such contracts must be reasonable and submitted for Commission approval by advice letter.10 Also in that decision, the Commission stated that bilateral contracts were not eligible for supplemental energy payments.11 Based on D.00-00-000 and D.00-00-000, the Commission set forth the following four requirements for approval of bilateral contracts in a Resolution approving a bilateral RPS contract executed by PG&E: (1) the contract is submitted for approval by advice letter;
Consistency With Commission Guidelines for Bilateral Contracting. The PPA is a result of the 2007 RPS Solicitation; this section is not applicable.
Consistency With Commission Guidelines for Bilateral Contracting. PG&E and TransAlta negotiated the PSA on a bilateral basis in 2009 prior to the Commission authorizing the solicitation of REC-only transactions in the annual RPS Solicitations. On October 29, 2009, PG&E filed Application A.00-00-000 seeking Commission approval of the PSA with TransAlta. In a Ruling dated April 22, 2010, XXX Xxxxx ordered PG&E to seek approval of the contracts in A.00-00-000 using a Tier 3 advice letter process for RPS contracts and present the information required by D.10-03- 021 for advice letters seeking approval of contracts for procurement of RECs only. On May 12, 2010, the Commission issued D.00-00-000 that stayed D.00-00-000. Finally, on January 14, 2011, the Commission issued D.00-00-000 that modified D.00-00-000 and lifted the stay of D.00-00-000 imposed by D.00-00-000. PG&E negotiated the First Amendment to the original agreement with TransAlta in order to comply with additional Commission requirements in D.00-00-000 as amended by 3 Pub. Util. Code § 399.14(a)(3).

Related to Consistency With Commission Guidelines for Bilateral Contracting

  • Performance and Compliance with Contracts and Credit and Collection Policy The Seller shall (and shall cause the Servicer to), at its expense, timely and fully perform and comply with all material provisions, covenants and other promises required to be observed by it under the Contracts related to the Receivables, and timely and fully comply in all material respects with the applicable Credit and Collection Policies with regard to each Receivable and the related Contract.

  • Hot Weather Guidelines For the purposes of site based discussions regarding the need to plan and perform work during expected periods of hot weather, the following issues shall be considered in conjunction with proper consideration of Occupational Health and Safety issues.

  • Publication of Procurement Contract 48.1 Within fourteen days after signing the contract, the Procuring Entity shall publish and publicize the awarded contract at its notice boards, entity website; and on the Website of the Authority in manner and format prescribed by the Authority. At the minimum, the notice shall contain the following information: a) name and address of the Procuring Entity; b) name and reference number of the contract being awarded, a summary of its scope and the selection method used; c) the name of the successful Tenderer, the final total contract price, the contract duration. d) dates of signature, commencement and completion of contract; e) names of all Tenderers that submitted Tenders, and their Tender prices as read out at Tender opening;

  • Compliance with Contracts and Credit and Collection Policy Originator will timely and fully (i) perform and comply with all provisions, covenants and other promises required to be observed by it under the Contracts related to the Receivables, and (ii) comply in all respects with the Credit and Collection Policy in regard to each Receivable and the related Contract.

  • General Guidelines Conduct yourself in a responsible manner at all times in the laboratory.

  • Sentencing Guidelines Calculations Defendant understands that in imposing sentence the Court will be guided by the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory, not mandatory, but that the Court must consider the Guidelines in determining a reasonable sentence.

  • Deadlines for Providing Insurance Documents after Renewal or Upon Request As set forth herein, certain insurance documents must be provided to the OGS Procurement Services contact identified in the Contract Award Notice after renewal or upon request. This requirement means that the Contractor shall provide the applicable insurance document to OGS as soon as possible but in no event later than the following time periods:

  • Ordering Guidelines and Processes 1.13.1 For information regarding Ordering Guidelines and Processes for various Network Elements, Combinations and Other Services, PLI should refer to the “Guides” section of the BellSouth Interconnection Web site, which is incorporated herein by reference, as amended from time to time. The Web site address is: http//xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/. 1.13.2 Additional information may also be found in the individual CLEC Information Packages, which are incorporated herein by reference, as amended from time to time, located at the “CLEC UNE Products” Web site address: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/guides/html/unes.html. 1.13.3 The provisioning of Network Elements, Combinations and Other Services to PLI’s Collocation Space will require cross-connections within the central office to connect the Network Element, Combinations or Other Services to the demarcation point associated with PLI’s Collocation Space. These cross-connects are separate components that are not considered a part of the Network Element, Combinations or Other Services and, thus, have a separate charge pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Incorporation of Prompt Payment Policy Statement into Contracts The provisions of this Exhibit shall apply to all Payments as they become due and owing pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, notwithstanding that NYSERDA may subsequently amend its Prompt Payment Policy by further rulemaking.

  • Compliance with Consensus Policies and Temporary Policies Registry Operator shall comply with and implement all Consensus Policies and Temporary Policies found at <xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/general/consensus-­‐policies.htm>, as of the Effective Date and as may in the future be developed and adopted in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws, provided such future Consensus Polices and Temporary Policies are adopted in accordance with the procedure and relate to those topics and subject to those limitations set forth in Specification 1 attached hereto (“Specification 1”).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!